Mechanism of Action Small ubiquitin-related modifier protein inhibitors
Phase I Lymphoma; Solid tumours
01 Oct 2018 Phase-I clinical trials in Solid tumours (Late-stage disease, Metastatic disease) and and Lymphoma (Refractory metastatic disease, Second-line therapy or greater) in USA (IV) (NCT03648372)
03 Sep 2018 Takeda Oncology plans a phase I trial for Solid tumours (Late-stage disease, Metastatic disease) and Lymphoma (Refractory metastatic disease, Second-line therapy or greater) in September 2018 (IV) (NCT03648372)
03 Sep 2018 Preclinical trials in Lymphoma in USA (IV) prior to September 2018 (NCT03648372)
Takeda is evaluating TAK-981, a SUMO-Activating Enzyme (SAE) inhibitor, in early clinical trials for the treatment of adult patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors or with relapsed or refractory lymphomas.
Small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) is a member of the ubiquitin-like protein (Ubl) family that is covalently conjugated to cellular proteins in a manner similar to Ub-conjugation (Kerscher, O., Felberbaum, R., and Hochstrasser, M. 2006. Modification of proteins by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 22: 159-80). Mammalian cells express three major isoforms: SUMO l , SUM02 and SUM03. SUM02 and SUM03 share -95% amino acid sequence homology but have -45% sequence homology with SUMO l (Kamitani, T., Kito, K., Nguyen, H. P., Fukuda-Kamitani, T., and Yeh, E. T. 1998. Characterization of a second member of the sentrin family of ubiquitin-like proteins. J Biol Chem. 273( 18): 1 1349-53). SUMO proteins can be conjugated to a single lysine residue of a protein (monosumoylation) or to a second SUMO protein that is already conjugated to a protein forming a SUMO chain (polysumoylation). Only SUM02/3 can form such chains because they possess internal consensus SUMO modification sites (Tatham, M. H., Jaffray, E., Vaughan, O. A., Desterro, J. M., Botting, C. H., Naismith, J. H., Hay, R. T. 2001. Polymeric chains of SUMO-2 and SUM 0-3 are conjugated to protein substrates by SAE1/SAE2 and Ubc9. J Biol Chem. 276(38):35368-74). An additional isoform, SUM04, is found in kidney, lymph node and spleen cells, but it is not known whether SUM04 can be conjugated to cellular proteins.
[0003] SUMO l , SUM02 and SUM03 are activated in an ATP-dependent manner by the SUMO-activating enzyme (SAE). SAE is a heterodimer that consists of SAE 1 (SUMO-activating enzyme subunit 1) and SAE2 (UBA2). SAE, like other El activating enzymes, uses ATP to adenylate the C-terminal glycine residue of SUMO. In a second step, a thioester intermediate is then formed between the C-terminal glycine of SUMO and a cysteine residue in SAE2. Next, SUMO is transferred from the El to the cysteine residue of the SUMO conjugating enzyme (E2), UBC9. Unlike the Ub pathway that contains many E2 enzymes, Ubc9 is currently the only known conjugating enzyme for SUMO and functions with SUMOl , SUM02 and SUM03 proteins. SUMO proteins are then conjugated to the target protein, either directly or in conjunction with an E3 ligase, through isopeptide bond formation with the epsilon amino group of a lysine side chain on a target protein. Several SUMO E3 ligases, including PIAS (protein inhibitor of activated signal transducer and activator of transcription protein) proteins and Ran-binding protein 2 (RanBP2), and polycomb 2 (Pc2), have been identified (Johnson, E. S., and Gupta, A. A. 2001. An E3-like factor that promotes SUMO conjugation to the yeast septins. Cell. 106(6):735-44; Pichler, A., Gast, A., Seeler, J. S., Dejean, A.; Melchior, F. 2002. The nucleoporin RanBP2 has SUMOl E3 ligase activity. Cell. 108(1): 109-20; Kagey, M. H., Melhuish, T. A., and Wotton, D. 2003. The polycomb protein Pc2 is a SUMO E3. Cell. 1 13(1): 127- 37). Once attached to cellular targets, SUMO modulates the function, subcellular localization, complex formation and/or stability of substrate proteins (Miiller, S., Hoege, C, Pyrowolakis, G., and Jentsch, S. 2001. SUMO, ubiquitin’s mysterious cousin. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2(3):202-10). SUMO- conjugation is reversible through the action of de-sumoylating enzymes called SENPs (Hay, R. T. 2007. SUMO-specific proteases: a twist in the tail. Trends Cell Biol. 17(8):370-6) and the SUMO proteins can then participate in additional conjugation cycles.
[0004] SAE-initiated SUMO-conjugation plays a major role in regulating diverse cellular processes, including cell cycle regulation, transcriptional regulation, cellular protein targeting, maintenance of genome integrity, chromosome segregation, and protein stability (Hay, R. T. 2005. SUMO: a history of modification. Mol Cell. 18( 1): 1 -12; Gill, G. 2004. SUMO and ubiquitin in the nucleus: different functions, similar mechanisms? Genes Dev. 18(17):2046-59). For example, SUMO- conjugation causes changes in the subcellular localization of RanGAPl by targeting it to the nuclear pore complex (Mahajan, R., Delphin, C., Guan, T., Gerace, L., and Melchior, F. 1997. A small ubiquitin-related polypeptide involved in targeting RanGAPl to nuclear pore complex protein RanBP2. Cell. 88(1):97- 1070). Sumoylation counteracts ubiquitination and subsequently blocks the degradation of Ι Β, thereby negatively regulating NF-κΒ activation (Desterro, J. M., Rodriguez, M. S., Hay, R. T. 1998. SUMO- 1 modification of IkappaB alpha inhibits NF-kappaB activation. Mol Cell. 2(2):233-9). Sumoylation has been reported to play an important role in transcription exhibiting both repressive and stimulatory effects. Many of the transcriptional nodes that are modulated play important roles in cancer. For example, sumoylation stimulates the transcriptional activities of transcription factors such as p53 and HSF2 (Rodriguez, M. S., Desterro, J. M., Lain, S., Midgley, C. A., Lane, D. P., and Hay, R. T. 1999. SUMO- 1 modification activates the transcriptional response of p53. EMBO J. 18(22):6455-61 ; Goodson, M. L., Hong, Y., Rogers, R., Matunis, M. J., Park-Sarge, O. K., Sarge, K. D. 2001. Sumo- 1 modification regulates the DNA binding activity of heat shock transcription factor 2, a promyelocytic leukemia nuclear body associated transcription factor. J Biol Chem. 276(21 ): 18513-8). In contrast, SUMO-conjugation represses the transcriptional activities of transcription factors such as LEF (Sachdev, S., Bruhn, L., Sieber, H., Pichler, A., Melchior, F., Grosschedl, R. 2001. PIASy, a nuclear matrix-associated SUMO E3 ligase, represses LEF1 activity by sequestration into nuclear bodies. Genes Dev. 15(23):3088- 103) and c-Myb (Bies, J., Markus, J., and Wolff, L. 2002. Covalent attachment of the SUMO- 1 protein to the negative regulatory domain of the c-Myb transcription factor modifies its stability and transactivation capacity. / Biol Chem. 277( 1 1):8999-9009). Thus, SUMO-conjugation controls gene expression and growth control pathways that are important for cancer cell survival.
[0005] Altered expression of SAE pathway components have been noted in a variety of cancer types: (Moschos, S. J., Jukic, D. M., Athanassiou, C., Bhargava, R., Dacic, S., Wang, X., Kuan, S. F., Fayewicz, S. L., Galambos, C., Acquafondata, M., Dhir, R., and Becker, D. 2010. Expression analysis of Ubc9, the single small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) E2 conjugating enzyme, in normal and malignant tissues. Hum Pathol. 41(9): 1286-980); including multiple myeloma (Driscoll, J. J., Pelluru, D., Lefkimmiatis, K., Fulciniti, M., Prabhala, R. H., Greipp, P. R., Barlogie, B., Tai, Y. T., Anderson, K. C, Shaughnessy, J. D. Jr., Annunziata, C. M., and Munshi, N. C. 2010. The sumoylation pathway is dysregulated in multiple myeloma and is associated with adverse patient outcome. Blood. 1 15(14):2827-34); and breast cancer (Chen, S. F., Gong, C, Luo, M., Yao, H. R., Zeng, Y. J., and Su, F. X. 201 1. Ubc9 expression predicts chemoresistance in breast cancer. Chin J Cancer. 30(9):638-44), In addition, preclinical studies indicate that Myc-driven cancers may be especially sensitive to SAE inhibition (Kessler, J. D., Kahle, K. T., Sun, T., Meerbrey, K. L., Schlabach, M. R., Schmitt, E. M., Skinner, S. O., Xu, Q., Li, M. Z., Hartman, Z. C, Rao, M., Yu, P., Dominguez-Vidana, R., Liang, A. C, Solimini, N. L., Bernardi, R. J., Yu, B., Hsu, T., Golding, I., Luo, J., Osborne, C. K., Creighton, C. J., Hilsenbeck, S. G., Schiff, R., Shaw, C. A., Elledge, S. J., and Westbrook, T. F. 2012. A SUMOylation-dependent transcriptional subprogram is required for Myc-driven tumorigenesis. Science. 335(6066):348-53; Hoellein, A., Fallahi, M., Schoeffmann, S., Steidle, S., Schaub, F. X., Rudelius, M., Laitinen, I., Nilsson, L., Goga, A., Peschel, C, Nilsson, J. A., Cleveland, J. L., and Keller, U. 2014. Myc-induced SUMOylation is a therapeutic vulnerability for B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 124( 13):2081 -90). Since SUMO-conjugation regulates essential cellular functions that contribute to the growth and survival of tumor cells, targeting SAE could represent an approach to treat proliferative disorders such as cancer.
[0006] SAE inhibitors may also be applicable for the treatment of other diseases and conditions outside of oncology. For example, SUMO modifies proteins that play important roles in neurodegenerative diseases (Steffan, J. S., Agrawal, N., Pallos, J., Rockabrand, E., Trotman, L. C, Slepko, N., Hies, K., Lukacsovich, T., Zhu, Y. Z., Cattaneo, E., Pandolfi, P. P., Thompson, L. M., Marsh, J. L. 2004. SUMO modification of Huntington and Huntington’s disease pathology. Science. 304(5667): 100-4); Dorval, V., and Fraser, P. E. 2006. Small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) modification of natively unfolded proteins tau and alpha-synuclein. J Biol Chem. 281 ( 15):9919-24; Ballatore, C, Lee, V. M., and Trojanowski, J. Q. 2007. Tau-mediated neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. 8(9):663-72). Sumoylation also has been reported to play important role in pathogenic viral infection, inflammation and cardiac function (Lee, H. R., Kim, D. J., Lee, J. M., Choi, C. Y., Ahn, B. Y., Hayward, G. S., and Ahn, J. H. 2004. Ability of the human cytomegalovirus ΓΕ1 protein to modulate sumoylation of PML correlates with its functional activities in transcriptional regulation and infectivity in cultured fibroblast cells. / Virol. 78(12):6527-42; Liu, B., and Shuai, K. 2009. Summon SUMO to wrestle with inflammation. Mol Cell. 35(6):731-2; Wang, J., and Schwartz, R. J. 2010. Sumoylation and regulation of cardiac gene expression. Circ Rei. l07( l): 19-29). [0007] It would be beneficial therefore to provide new SAE inhibitors that possess good therapeutic properties, especially for the treatment of proliferative, inflammatory, cardiovascular and neurodegenerative disorders.
[00714] An oven-dried 2-neck 250 mL round bottom flask under nitrogen was charged with THF (40 mL) and cooled to -74 °C . Added 2.50 M ra-BuLi in hexane (6.92 mL, 17.3 mmol). Added a solution of Int-1 (4.00 g, 16.0 mmol) in THF (60 mL) slowly keeping the internal temperature less than -70 °C . Stirred with cooling 5 min. A second oven-dried 250 mL round bottom flask under nitrogen was charged with THF (60 mL) and Int-50 (2.04 g, 12.4 mmol) and the resulting solution was cooled to 0 °C . Added boron trifluoride diethyl ether complex ( 1.71 mL, 13.6 mmol) slowly and cooled to -30 °C . The contents of the first flask were transferred via cannula to the second flask. Reaction was quenched with saturated aqueous NaHC03 and warmed to rt. Water was added, and the mixture was extracted three times with EtOAc. Combined organic portions were washed with brine, dried over anhydrous Na2S04, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. Residue was purified via flash column chromatography eluting with a hexane / EtOAc gradient (0 to 100% EtOAc) to afford the title compound as a white solid ( 1.88g, 45%). Ή NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.17 – 7.01 (m, 2H), 6.83 – 6.61 (m, 2H), 5.92 (s, 1H), 5.09 (s, 1H), 4.17 – 4.04 (m, 2H), 4.03 – 3.92 (m, 2H), 3.37 – 3.25 (m, 1H), 3.13 – 2.91 (m, 2H), 2.82 – 2.69 (m, 1H), 2.46 (s, 3H). LCMS: (AA) M+l 336.1
Step 2: ieri-Butyl 7-chIoro-l-[5-(l,3-dioxolan-2-yl)-2-methyl-3-thienyl]-3,4-dihydroisoquinoIine -2(lH)-carboxyIate [00715] A 50 mL round bottom flask under nitrogen was charged with 7-chloro-l -[5-(l ,3-dioxolan-2- yl)-2-methyl-3-thienyl]- l ,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline (5.67 g, 16.9 mmol) and DCM ( 100 mL), to which was added triethylamine (4.71 mL, 33.8 mmol), di-ieri-butyldicarbonate (4.61 g, 21.1 mmol), and N,N-dimethylaminopyridine (23 mg, 0.18 mmol). Reaction was stirred for 1 h at rt and then poured into saturated NaHC03 solution. Mixture was extracted three times with DCM, and the combined organic portions were washed with brine, dried over Na2S04, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was subjected to flash column chromatography eluting with a hexane / EtOAc gradient to afford 6.96g (95%) of the title compound. LCMS: (AA) M+ l 436.1
[00716] A 1 L round bottom flask was charged with ferf-butyl 7-chloro-
1 -[5-( 1 ,3-dioxolan-2-yl)-2-methyl-3-thienyl]-3 ,4-dihydroisoquinoline-2( 1 H)-carboxylate (7.30 g, 16.7 mmol), methanol (200 mL), and water (20 mL), to which was added a solution of 12M HC1 (4.00 mL, 130 mmol) in methanol (200 mL), and the reaction was stirred at rt for 1 h. Reaction was quenched via addition of 50mL of saturated NaHC03 and stirred for 5 min. Methanol was removed in vacuo, and the resulting aqueous mixture was extracted three times with EtOAc, and then the combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over anhydrous Na2S04 and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was subjected to flash column chromatography eluting with a hexane / EtOAc gradient to afford the title compound (4.55g, 70%). Ή NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 9.67 (s, 1 H), 7.27 – 7.15 (m, 2H), 7.12 (s, 1 H), 6.98 – 6.94 (m, 1 H), 6.34 (m, l H), 4.15 (s, 1 H), 3.18 – 3.06 (m, 1 H), 3.05 – 2.93 (m, 1H), 2.82 – 2.73 (m, 1 H), 2.69 (s, 3H), 1.50 (s, 9H). LCMS: (AA) M+Na 414.2
[00717] An oven-dried 500 mL 3-neck round bottom flask under nitrogen was charged with 4-chloro- 5-iodopyrimidine (4.08 g, 17.0 mmol) and 2-methyltetrahydrofuran ( 150 mL). An addition funnel containing a solution of rert-butyl 7-chloro- l -(5-formyl-2-methyl-3-thienyl)-3,4- dihydroisoquinoline-2(l H)-carboxylate (4.75 g, 12.1 mmol) in 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (50 mL) was attached, and the contents of the reaction flask were cooled to -75 °C . 2.50 M n-BuLi in hexane ( 14.1 mL, 35.2 mmol) was added in small portions keeping the internal temperature less than -70 °C , at which point the contents of addtion funnel were added in a single portion. Upon completion of addition, the reaction was quenched by adding 20 mL of saturated NaHC03 in small portions and warmed to rt. The aqueous mixture was extracted three times with EtOAc, and then the combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over anhydrous Na2S04 and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was subjected to flash column chromatography eluting with a hexane / EtOAc gradient to afford the title compound (4.85g, 79%). LCMS: (AA) M+Na 528.1
[00718] A 1 L round bottom flask was charged with fe/Y-butyl 7-chloro- l – { 5-[(4-chloropyrimidin-5- yl)(hydroxy)methyl]-2-methyl-3-thienyl}-3,4-dihydroisoquinoline-2(l H)-carboxylate (4.85 g, 9.58 mmol) and DCM (300 mL). Manganese (IV) oxide (14.2 g, 163 mmol) was added and the reaction was stirred at rt for 18 h. Mixture was filtered through Celite, and the filter cake was rinsed with hot EtOAc. Filtrate was concentrated in vacuo to afford the title compound (4.47g , 93%). Ή NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 9.09 (s, 1 H), 8.70 (s, 1 H), 7.24 – 7.16 (m, 1 H), 7.16
[00719] A 1 L round bottom flask under nitrogen was charged with iert-butyl 7-chloro- l – { 5-[(4- chloropyrimidin-5-yl)carbonyI]-2-methyl-3-thienyl }-3,4-dihydroisoquinoline-2( l H)-carboxylate (4.47 g, 8.86 mmol), DMF (20.0 mL, 258 mmol), Int-259 (3.06 g, 10.6 mmol), and triethylamine (3.09 mL, 22.2 mmol) and the mixture was stirred at rt for 18 h. Reaction mixture was poured into water and saturated NaHC03, and then extracted three times with EtOAc, and then the combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over anhydrous Na2S04 and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was subjected to flash column chromatography eluting with a 70/30 to 60/40 hexane/EtOAc gradient to afford 0.56g of first-eluting diastereomer 1 (not pictured), 4.3 l g of a mixture of diastereomers, and 1.1 lg ( 17%) of second-eluting diastereomer 2 (the title compound). The mixture of diastereomers thus obtained was resubjected to the described chromatography conditions two additional times to afford a total of 2.62 g of the desired diastereomer. Ή NMR (400 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 8.54 – 8.46 (m, 2H), 7.27 – 7.19 (m, 2H), 7.09 – 6.99 (m, 2H), 6.37 (s, 1H), 4.87 – 4.75 (m, 1H), 4.38 – 4.29 (m, 1H), 4.20 – 4.09 (m, 1H), 3.66 – 3.52 (m, 2H), 3.28- 3.14 (m, 2H), 3.02 – 2.89 (m, 1 H), 2.89 – 2.78 (m, 1 H), 2.68 (s, 3H), 2.54 – 2.41 (m, 1 H), 2.22 – 2.09 (m, 2H), 1.86 – 1.73 (m, 1H), 1.50 (s, 8H), 1.39 – 1.23 (m, 2H), 1.15 – 1.04 (m, 20H).
LCMS: (AA) M+ 1 755.3
Step 7: tert-Butyl (lR)-7-chloro-l-[2-methyl-5-[4-[[(lR,3R,4S)-3-(sulfamoyloxymethyl)-4- triisopropylsilyloxy-cyclopentyl]amino]pyrimidine-5-carbonyl]-3-thienyl]-3,4-dihydro-lH- isoquinoline-2-carboxylate [00720] A solution of ie/t-butyl (lR)-7-chloro-l-[5-[4-[[( lR,3R,4S)-3-(hydroxymethyl)-4- triisopropylsilyloxy-cyclopentyl]amino]pyrimidine-5-carbonyl]-2-methyl-3-thienyl]-3,4-dih lH-isoquinoline-2-carboxylate (2.46 g, 3.26 mmol) in 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (25 mL), and DMF (25 mL) was cooled to 0 °C. Triethylamine ( 1.82 mL, 13.0 mmol) and chlorosulfonamide (1.50 g, 13.0 mmol) were added and the reaction was stirred for 10 min. Added methanol (0.53 mL, 13.0 mmol) and stirred for 15 min. Reaction mixture was poured into saturated NaHC03, extracted three times with EtOAc, and then the combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over anhydrous Na2S04 and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was subjected to flash column chromatography eluting with a hexane / EtOAc gradient to afford the title compound (2.41g, 89%). Ή NMR (400 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 8.58 – 8.45 (m, 2H), 7.29 – 7.17 (m, 2H), 7.1 1 – 6.98 (m, 2H), 6.36 (s, 1 H), 4.84 – 4.73 (m, 1H), 4.44 – 4.33 (m, 1H), 4.21 – 4.08 (m, 4H), 3.27- 3.17 (m, 1 H),3.02 – 2.89 (m, 1 H), 2.88 – 2.78 (m, 1 H), 2.67 (s, 3H), 2.57 – 2.47 (m, 1 H), 2.41 – 2.30 (m, 1 H), 2.23 – 2.13 (m, 1 H), 1.87- 1.78 (m, 1 H), 1.50 (s, 9H), 1.43 – 1 .33 (m, 1 H), 1 .17 – 1.04 (m, 20H). LCMS: (AA) M+l 834.3
[00721] A solution of f«?r/-butyl ( l R)-7-chloro- l -[2-methyl-5-[4-[[( l R,3R,4S)-3-
(sulfamoyloxymethyl)-4-triisopropylsilyloxy-cyclopentyl]amino]pyrimidine-5-carbonyl]-3- thienyl]-3,4-dihydro- l H-isoquinoline-2-carboxylate (2.41 g, 2.89 mmol) in CH3CN ( 10 mL) was cooled in an ice bath to + 1 °C . Phosphoric acid ( 10 mL, 200 mmol) was added dropwise and the reaction was stirred with ice bath cooling for 60 min. The mixture was warmed to rt and stirred for an additional 3 h. Reaction was poured into a stirring mixture of 50 mL water and 50 mL EtOAc, and the the pH was adjusted to ~9 by slowly adding 200 mL of saturated NaHC03 with stirring. Resulting aqueous mixture was extracted three times with EtOAc, and then the combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over anhydrous Na2S04 and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was subjected to flash column chromatography eluting with a gradient that began with 100% DCM and increased in polarity to 80% DCM / 20% methanol / 2% ammonium hydroxide gradient to afford the title compound (1.50 g, 90%). Ή NMR (400 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 8.61 (s, 1H), 8.52 (s, 1 H), 7.27 (s, 1 H), 7.18 – 7.13 (m, 2H), 6.73 – 6.68 (m, 1 H), 5.23 (s, 1H), 4.81 – 4.70 (m, 1 H), 4.26 – 4.10 (m, 3H), 3.29 – 3.23 (m, 2H), 3.1 1 – 2.96 (m, 2H), 2.87 – 2.76 (m, 1H), 2.60 (s, 3H), 2.55 – 2.42 (m, 1 H), 2.33 – 2.19 (m, 1H), 2.18 – 2.07 (m, 1H), 1.95 – 1.81 (m, 1H), 1.47 – 1.35 (m, 1 H). LCMS: (AA) M+l 580.0
Presenter: Steven Paul Langston, associate director at Takeda Pharmaceuticals International
Target: Sumo activating enzyme
Disease: Solid tumors
Reporter’s notes: Langston gave the last talk of the morning session, placing him in the “precarious position of being between you and lunch,” he said. Takeda acquired this drug development program, falling under the umbrella of immuno-oncology, along with Millenium Pharmaceuticals in 2008. The team targeted a pathway known as SUMOylation, a protein post translation modification that is implicated in a number of cellular processes including immune response. In SUMOylation, enzymes attach a small protein to another protein. They found that inhibiting this pathway activates a type I interferon response in immune cells. How the molecule, TAK-981, inhibits this pathway is quite complicated, Langston said. TAK-981 forms an adduct with a small ubiquitin like modifier (SUMO) to inhibit a SUMO activating enzyme that catalyzes SUMOylation. While the synthesis of TAK-981 is fairly short, it requires a nonideal chiral chromatography separation after the first step. TAK-981 is in Phase I clinical trials as an intravenous infusion for patients with metastatic solid tumors or lymphomas.
The present invention generally relates to heteroaryl substituted aminopyridine compounds useful as kinase inhibitors, including the modulation of IRAK-4. Provided herein are heteroaryl substituted aminopyridine compounds, compositions comprising such compounds, and methods of their use. The invention further pertains to pharmaceutical compositions containing at least one compound according to the invention that are useful for the treatment of conditions related to kinase modulation and methods of inhibiting the activity of kinases, including IRAK-4 in a mammal.
Toll/IL-1 receptor family members are important regulators of inflammation and host resistance. The Toll like receptor (TLR) family recognizes molecular patterns derived from infectious organisms including bacteria, fungi, parasites, and viruses (reviewed in Kawai, T. et al., Nature Immunol., 11:373-384 (2010)). Ligand binding to the receptor induces dimerization and recruitment of adaptor molecules to a conserved cytoplasmic motif in the receptor termed the Toll/IL-1 receptor (TIR) domain. With the exception of TLR3, all TLRs recruit the adaptor molecule MyD88. The IL-1 receptor family also contains a cytoplasmic TIR motif and recruits MyD88 upon ligand binding (reviewed in Sims, J. E. et al., Nature Rev. Immunol., 10:89-102 (2010)).
Members of the IRAK family of serine/threonine kinases are recruited to the receptor via interactions with MyD88. The family consists of four members. Several lines of evidence indicate that IRAK4 plays a critical and non-redundant role in initiating signaling via MyD88 dependent TLRs and IL-1R family members. Structural data confirms that IRAK4 directly interacts with MyD88 and subsequently recruits either IRAK1 or IRAK2 to the receptor complex to facilitate downstream signaling (Lin, S. et al., Nature, 465:885-890 (2010)). IRAK4 directly phosphorylates IRAK1 to facilitate downstream signaling to the E3 ubiquitin ligase TRAF6, resulting in activation of the serine/threonine kinase TAK1 with subsequent activation of the NFκB pathway and MAPK cascade (Flannery, S. et al., Biochem. Pharmacol., 80:1981-1991 (2010)). A subset of human patients was identified who lack IRAK4 expression (Picard, C. et al.,Science, 299:2076-2079 (2003)). Cells from these patients fail to respond to all TLR agonists with the exception of TLR3 as well as to members of the IL-1 family including IL-113 and IL-18 (Ku, C. et al., J. Exp. Med., 204:2407-2422 (2007)). Deletion of IRAK4 in mice results in a severe block in IL-1, IL-18 and all TLR dependent responses with the exception of TLR3 (Suzuki, N. et al., Nature, 416:750-754 (2002)). In contrast, deletion of either IRAK1 (Thomas, J. A. et al., J. Immunol., 163:978-984 (1999); Swantek, J. L. et al., J. Immunol., 164:4301-4306 (2000) or IRAK2 (Wan, Y. et al., J. Biol. Chem., 284:10367-10375 (2009)) results in partial loss of signaling. Furthermore, IRAK4 is the only member of the IRAK family whose kinase activity has been shown to be required for initiation of signaling. Replacement of wild type IRAK4 in the mouse genome with a kinase inactive mutant (KDKI) impairs signaling via all MyD88 dependent receptors including IL-1, IL-18 and all TLRs with the exception of TLR3 (Koziczak-Holbro, M. et al., J. Biol. Chem., 282:13552-13560 (2007); Kawagoe, T. et al., J. Exp. Med., 204:1013-1024 (2007); and Fraczek, J. et al., J. Biol. Chem., 283:31697-31705 (2008)).
As compared to wild type animals, IRAK4 KDKI mice show greatly reduced disease severity in mouse models of multiple sclerosis (Staschke, K. A. et al., J. Immunol., 183:568-577 (2009)), rheumatoid arthritis (Koziczak-Holbro, M. et al., Arthritis Rheum., 60:1661-1671 (2009)), atherosclerosis (Kim, T. W. et al., J. Immunol., 186:2871-2880 (2011) and Rekhter, M. et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., 367:642-648 (2008)), and myocardial infarction (Maekawa, Y. et al., Circulation, 120:1401-1414 (2009)). As described, IRAK4 inhibitors will block all MyD88 dependent signaling. MyD88 dependent TLRs have been shown to contribute to the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, sepsis, systemic lupus erythematosus, inflammatory bowel diseases including Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, autoimmune uveitis, asthma, allergy, type I diabetes, and allograft rejection (Keogh, B. et al., Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 32:435-442 (2011); Mann, D. L., Circ. Res., 108:1133-1145 (2011); Horton, C. G. et al., Mediators Inflamm., Article ID 498980 (2010), doi:10.1155/2010/498980; Goldstein, D. R. et al., J Heart Lung Transplant., 24:1721-1729 (2005); and Cario, E., Inflamm. Bowel Dis., 16:1583-1597 (2010)). Oncogenically active MyD88 mutations in diffuse large B cell lymphomas have been identified that are sensitive to IRAK4 inhibition (Ngo, V. N. et al., Nature, 470:115-121 (2011)). Whole genome sequencing also identified mutations in MyD88 associated with chronic lymphatic leukemia suggesting that IRAK4 inhibitors may also have utility in treating leukemia (Puente, X. S. et al., Nature, 475:101-105 (2011)).
In addition to blocking TLR signaling, IRAK4 inhibitors will also block signaling by members of the IL-1 family. Neutralization of IL-1 has been shown to be efficacious in multiple diseases including gout; gouty arthritis; type 2 diabetes; auto-inflammatory diseases including Cryopyrin-Associated Periodic Syndromes (CAPS), TNF Receptor Associated Periodic Syndrome (TRAPS), Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF), adult onset stills; systemic onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis; stroke; Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD); smoldering multiple myeloma; recurrent pericarditis; osteoarthritis; emphysema (Dinarello, C. A., Eur. J. Immunol., 41:1203-1217 (2011) and Couillin, I. et al., J Immunol., 183:8195-8202 (2009)). In a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease, blockade of IL-1 receptor improved cognitive defects, attenuated tau pathology and reduced oligomeric forms of amyloid-β (Kitazawa, M. et al., J. Immunol., 187:6539-6549 (2011)). IL-1 has also been shown to be a critical link to adaptive immunity, driving differentiation of the TH17 effector T cell subset (Chung, Y. et al., Immunity, 30:576-587 (2009)). Therefore, IRAK4 inhibitors are predicted to have efficacy in TH17 associated diseases including multiple sclerosis, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel diseases, autoimmune uveitis, and rheumatoid arthritis (Wilke, C. M. et al., Trends Immunol., 32:603-661 (2011)).
WO2013/106612, WO2013/106614, WO2013/106641, WO2014/074657, and WO2014/074675 disclose substituted pyridyl compounds useful as kinase inhibitors, including the modulation of IRAK4.
In view of the conditions that may benefit by treatment involving modulation of protein kinases, it is immediately apparent that new compounds capable of modulating protein kinases such as IRAK-4 and methods of using these compounds could provide substantial therapeutic benefits to a wide variety of patients.
The present invention relates to a new class of heteroaryl substituted aminopyridine compounds found to be effective inhibitors of protein kinases including IRAK-4. These compounds are provided to be useful as pharmaceuticals with desirable stability, bioavailability, therapeutic index, and toxicity values that are important to their drugability.
Development of a Scalable Synthesis for the Potent Kinase Inhibitor BMS-986236; 1-(5-(4-(3-Hydroxy-3-methylbutyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)-4-(isopropylamino)pyridin-2-yl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine-5-carbonitrile
†Department of Discovery Synthesis, Biocon Bristol-Myers Squibb Research Center, Biocon Park, Bommasandra IV Phase, Jigani Link Road, Bangalore-560 099, India
‡Discovery Chemistry, Bristol-Myers Squibb, P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-4000, United States
A scalable route to 1-(5-(4-(3-hydroxy-3-methylbutyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)-4-(isopropylamino)pyridin-2-yl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine-5-carbonitrile (1, BMS-986236) was developed by incorporating an alternate azide intermediate following safety-driven processes. The newly developed process involved mitigating safety hazards and eliminating the column chromatography purification. The issue of trace metal contamination in the final API observed in the first-generation synthesis has been overcome.
1 (92.5 g, 73% yield, 99.5% purity by HPLC) as a cream-colored solid.
Sundaram Venkataraman, Srinivasulu Gudipati, Brahmeshwararao Mandava Venkata Naga, Goverdhan Banda, Radhakrishna Singamsetty, “Process for preparing form I of tegaserod maleate.” U.S. Patent US20050272802, issued December 08, 2005.US20050272802
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Tegaserod maleate [USAN]
189188-57-6
Tegaserod
CAS Registry Number: 145158-71-0
CAS Name: 2-[(5-Methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene]-N-pentylhydrazinecarboximidamide
Molecular Formula: C16H23N5O
Molecular Weight: 301.39
Percent Composition: C 63.76%, H 7.69%, N 23.24%, O 5.31%
Literature References: Selective serotonin 5HT4-receptor partial agonist. Prepn: R. K. A. Giger, H. Mattes, EP505322; eidem,US5510353 (1992, 1996 both to Sandoz); K.-H. Buchheit et al.,J. Med. Chem.38, 2331 (1995). Clinical pharmacology: S. Appel et al.,Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.62, 546 (1997); and pharmacokinetics: idemet al.,J. Clin. Pharmacol.37, 229 (1997). Clinical trial in irritable bowel syndrome: S. A. Müller-Lissner et al.,Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther.15, 1655 (2001); in female patients: J. Novick et al.,ibid.16, 1877 (2002). Review of clinical efficacy: B. W. Jones et al.,J. Clin. Pharm. Ther.27, 343-352 (2002); of mechanism of action, efficacy and safety: M. Corsetti, J. Tack, Expert Opin. Pharmacother.3, 1211-1218 (2002).
Properties: mp 155°.
Melting point: mp 155°
Derivative Type: Maleate
CAS Registry Number: 189188-57-6
Manufacturers’ Codes: SDZ-HTF-919
Trademarks: Zelmac (Novartis); Zelnorm (Novartis)
Molecular Formula: C16H23N5O.C4H4O4
Molecular Weight: 417.46
Percent Composition: C 57.54%, H 6.52%, N 16.78%, O 19.16%
Therap-Cat: Gastroprokinetic; in treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.
Tegaserod is a 5-HT4agonist manufactured by Novartis and sold under the names Zelnorm and Zelmac for the management of irritable bowel syndrome and constipation.[1] Approved by the FDA in 2002, it was subsequently removed from the market in 2007 due to FDA concerns about possible adverse cardiovascular effects. Before then, it was the only drug approved by the United StatesFood and Drug Administration to help relieve the abdominal discomfort, bloating, and constipation associated with irritable bowel syndrome. Its use was also approved to treat chronic idiopathic constipation.[2]
In 2000, originator Novartis established an alliance with Bristol-Myers Squibb for the codevelopment and copromotion of tegaserod maleate, which is now available in more than 55 countries worldwide for the treatment of IBS with constipation. In 2015, Zelnorm was acquired by Sloan Pharma from Novartis.
Novartis’ brand name Zelnorm (tegaserod) had originally received approval from the US FDA in 2002 for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) [5, 8]. It was, however, voluntarily withdrawn from widespread use in the US market in 2007 after concerns arose over the possibility that tegaserod could potentially cause dangerous cardiovascular events in patients [5,8]. Since then, closer evaluations of the original data suggesting such cardiovascular risk have resulted in the limited reintroduction or ‘re-approval’ of tegaserod for treatment of IBS-C specifically in female patients less than 65 years of age and whom are considered to be at a lower risk of a cardiovascular event than the broader population . Zelnorm (tegaserod) by Sloan Pharma subsequently gained re-approval in April of 2019 [5]. Nevertheless, tegaserod remains un-approved in certain regions [7].
Despite the relative complications involved in its history of regulatory approval, ever since its first introduction in 2002 tegaserod remains the only therapy for IBS-C that possesses the unique mechanism of action of acting on serotonin-4 (5-HT(4)) receptors in smooth muscle cells and in the gastrointestinal wall to facilitate actions like esophageal relaxation, peristaltic gut movement, and natural secretions in the gut, among others
Mechanism of action
The drug functions as a motility stimulant, achieving its desired therapeutic effects through activation of the 5-HT4 receptors of the enteric nervous system in the gastrointestinal tract. It also stimulates gastrointestinal motility and the peristaltic reflex, and allegedly reduces abdominal pain.[3] Additionally, tegaserod is a 5-HT2B receptor antagonist.[4]
Withdrawal from market
On 30 March 2007, the United States Food and Drug Administration requested that Novartis withdraw Zelnorm from shelves.[5] The FDA alleges a relationship between prescriptions of the drug and increased risks of heart attack or stroke. An analysis of data collected on over 18,000 patients demonstrated adverse cardiovascular events in 13 of 11,614 patients treated with Zelnorm (a rate of 0.11%) as compared with 1 of 7,031 patients treated with placebo (a rate of 0.01%). Novartis alleges all of the affected patients had preexisting cardiovascular disease or risk factors for such, and further alleges that no causal relationship between tegaserod use and cardiovascular events has been demonstrated.[6] On the same day as the FDA announcement, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada announced that it was suspending marketing and sales of the drug in Canada in response to a request from Health Canada.[7] In a large cohort study based on a US health insurance database, no increase in the risk of cardiovascular events were found under tegaserod treatment.[8] Currently, tegaserod may only be used in emergency situations only with prior authorization from the FDA.[9]
Paper
The serotonin 5-HT4 receptor. 2. Structure-activity studies of the indole carbazimidamide class of agonists
J Med Chem 1995, 38(13): 2331
In a preferred embodiment of the first aspect of the present invention, the process of preparing tegaserod or a salt thereof comprises the steps of:
(a) coupling S-methyl-isothiosemicarbazide or a salt thereof and 5-methoxy-indole-3-carboxaldehyde to form 1-((5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)-S-methyl-isothiosemicarbazide:
It is to be understood that where tautomeric forms occur, the present invention embraces all tautomeric forms and their mixtures, i.e. although S-methyl-isothio-semicarbazide and 1-((5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)-S-methyl-isothiosemi-carbazide are mostly defined for convenience by reference to one isothiosemicarbazide form only, and although tegaserod is mostly defined for convenience by reference to one guanidino form only, the invention is not to be understood as being in any way limited by the particular nomenclature or graphical representation employed.
[0018]
When an S-methyl-isothiosemicarbazide salt is used in the process of the present invention, this may be an acid addition salt with acids, including but not limited to inorganic acids such as hydrohalogenic acids (for example, hydrofluoric, hydrochloric, hydrobromic or hydroiodic acid) or other inorganic acids (for example, nitric, perchloric, sulfuric or phosphoric acid), or organic acids such as organic carboxylic acids (for example, propionic, butyric, glycolic, lactic, mandelic, citric, acetic, benzoic, salicylic, succinic, malic or hydroxysuccinic, tartaric, fumaric, maleic, hydroxymaleic, mucic or galactaric, gluconic, pantothenic or pamoic acid), organic sulfonic acids (for example, methanesulfonic, trifluoromethanesulfonic, ethanesulfonic, 2-hydroxyethanesulfonic, benzenesulfonic, p-toluenesulfonic, naphthalene-2-sulfonic or camphorsulfonic acid) or amino acids (for example, ornithinic, glutamic or aspartic acid). Preferably the S-methyl-isothiosemicarbazide salt is a hydrohalide (such as the hydrofluoride, hydrochloride, hydrobromide, or hydroiodide) or a sulfonate (such as the methanesulfonate, benzenesulfonate, or p-toluenesulfonate). Preferably the S-methyl-isothiosemicarbazide salt is S-methyl-isothiosemicarbazide hydroiodide.
The following synthetic scheme demonstrates a preferred process of the present invention.
The invention is now demonstrated by the following non-limiting illustrative example.
EXAMPLE Step 1: Schiff’s Base Formation of 5-methoxy-indole-3-carboxaldehyde and S-methyl-isothiosemi-carbazide hydroiodide
[0033]
5-Methoxy-indole-3-carboxaldehyde (1.5 g, 1 eq) and S-methyl-isothiosemicarbazide hydroiodide (3.99 g, 2 eq) in methanol (15 ml, 10 vol) were stirred in the presence of triethylamine (3 ml, 2 vol) at 25-30° C. for 2 hours. After completion of the reaction, the methanol was removed by distillation under reduced pressure at 45-50° C. and ethyl acetate (10.5 ml, 7 vol) was added to the residue to precipitate out the product. The product, 1-((5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)-S-methyl-isothiosemi-carbazide, was separated by filtration, washed with ethyl acetate (3 ml, 2 vol) and dried under vacuum at 45-50° C. The yield was almost quantitative (˜100%).
Step 2: Conversion of 1-((5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)-S-methyl-isothiosemicarbazide to 1-((5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)methyleneamino)-3-pentyl-guanidine (Tegaserod)
[0034]
A solution of 1-((5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)-S-methyl-isothiosemicarbazide (8.0 g, 1 eq) and n-pentyl amine (2.65 g, 1 eq) was refluxed in methanol (8 ml, 1 vol) at 66° C. for 4 hours. After completion of the reaction, the methanol was removed by distillation under reduced pressure at 45-50° C. to obtain tegaserod free base as a yellowish brown solid. Yield=97%. HPLC purity=95%.
Step 3: Conversion of 1-((5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)methyleneamino)-3-pentyl-guanidine (Tegaserod) to Tegaserod Maleate
[0035]
1-((5-Methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)methyleneamino)-3-pentyl-guanidine (55 g, 1 eq) was taken in methanol (357.5 ml, 6.5 vol) and stirred. To this reaction mixture was added at room temperature a solution of maleic acid (74.15 g, 3.5 eq) in water (137.5 ml, 2.5 vol) and the reaction mixture stirred for one hour at room temperature. The solid obtained was then filtered through a Buchner funnel and dried at 700 mmHg and 500° C. Yield=36.8 g, 48.42%. HPLC purity=99.45%.
EV 320 251 655 US Powder X-ray diffraction (“PXRD”) analysis using a SCINTAG powder X-ray diffϊactometer model X’TRA equipped with a solid-state detector. Copper radiation of λ=1.5418 A was used. The sample was introduced using a round standard aluminum sample holder with round zero background quartz plate in the bottom.
Thermal Gravimetric Analysis TTGA):
TGA/SDTA 85 r, Mettler Toledo , Sample weight 7-15 mg.
Heating rate: 100C/ min., in N2 stream: flow rate: 50 ml/min
Example 1 : Preparation of Tegaserod maleate Form B
To a mixture of 90 g MICHO and 63 g NaOH [47 %] was added a solution of 212 g AGPΗI dissolved in 566 mL of water at room temperature. The resultant reaction mixture was heated to 400C. After 3 hours, 522 mL of ethyl acetate was added and the reaction mixture was stirred for an additional hour. The organic phase was washed with water (3 x 450 mL), and vacuum filtered. After addition of 211 mL ethyl acetate and 870 mL of n-propanol, the mixture was heated to 600C and a solution of maleic acid (86.5 g in 180 mL water), at the same temperature, was added to the reaction mixture and stirred at the same temperature. After 2 hours the reaction mixture was cooled to about 100C and stirred for an additional hour. The resulting solid was filtered off, washed with n-propanol, and dried in a vacuum oven over night to give 195.8 g of tegaserod maleate Form B.
Tegaserod maleate is an aminoguanidine indole 5HT4 agonist for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Tegaserod maleate has the following structure:
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
According to the prescribing information (Physician’s Desk Reference, 57th Ed., at Page 2339), tegaserod as the maleate salt is a white to off-white crystalline powder and is slightly soluble in ethanol and very slightly soluble in water. Tegaserod maleate is available commercially as ZELNORM®, in which it is present as crystalline form.
Tegaserod maleate is disclosed in US patent No. 5,510,353 and in its equivalent EP 0 505 322 (example 13), and is reported to have a melting point of 1900C (table 1 example 13).
The literature (Buchheit K.H, et al., J.Med.Chem., 1995, 38, 2331) describes a general method for the condensation of amino guanidines with indole-3-carbadehydes in methanol in the presence of HCl (pH 3-4). The product obtained after solvent evaporation maybe converted to its hydrochloride salt by treatment of the methanolic solution with diethylether/HCl followed by recrystallization from
methanol/diethylether. Tegaserod base prepared according to this general method is characterized solely by a melting point of 155 0C (table 3 compound 5b). Additional Tegaserod maleate characterization was done by 1H and 13C-NMR according to the literature (Jing J. et. al., Guangdong Weiliang Yuansu Kexue, 2002, 9/2, 51).
WO 04/085393 discloses four crystalline forms of tegaserod maleate. The search report for WO 04/085393 further identifies WO 00/10526, and Drugs Fut. 1999, 24(1) which provides an overview for tegaserod maleate. Additional crystalline forms of tegaserod maleate are provided in WO 2005/058819, one of which is characterized by an X-ray Diffraction pattern having peaks at 15.7, 16.9, 17.2, 24.1, 24.6 and 25.2±0.2 two theta (designated as Form B in that PCT publication).
The solid state physical properties of tegaserod salt may be influenced by controlling the conditions under which tegaserod salt is obtained in solid Form. Solid state physical properties include, for example, the flowability of the milled solid. Flowability affects the ease with which the material is handled during processing into a pharmaceutical product. When particles of the powdered compound do not flow past each other easily, a formulation specialist must take that fact into account in developing a tablet or capsule formulation, which may necessitate the use of glidants such as colloidal silicon dioxide, talc, starch or tribasic calcium phosphate.
Another important solid state property of a pharmaceutical compound is its rate of dissolution in aqueous fluid. The rate of dissolution of an active ingredient in a patient’s stomach fluid may have therapeutic consequences since it imposes an upper limit on the rate at which an orally- administered active ingredient may reach the patient’s bloodstream. The rate of dissolution is also a consideration in
formulating syrups, elixirs and other liquid medicaments. The solid state Form of a compound may also affect its behavior on compaction and its storage stability.
These practical physical characteristics are influenced by the conformation and orientation of molecules in the unit cell, which defines a particular polymorphic Form of a substance. The polymorphic form may give rise to thermal behavior different from that of the amorphous material or another polymorphic Form. Thermal behavior is measured in the laboratory by such techniques as capillary melting point, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and may be used to distinguish some polymorphic forms from others. A particular polymorphic Form may also give rise to distinct spectroscopic properties that may be detectable by powder X-ray crystallography, solid state C NMR spectrometry and infrared spectrometry.
The discovery of new polymorphic forms of a pharmaceutically useful compound provides a new opportunity to improve the performance characteristics of a pharmaceutical product. It enlarges the repertoire of materials that a formulation scientist has available for designing, for example, a pharmaceutical dosage form of a drug with a targeted release profile or other desired characteristic.
The polymorphic forms may further help in purification of tegaserod, particularly if they possess high crystallinity. In the event of metastability, a metastable polymorphic form may be used to prepare a more stable polymorph.
Hence, discovery of new polymorphic forms and new processes help in advancing a formulation scientist in preparation of tegaserod as an active pharmaceutical ingredient in a formulation.
The present invention provides an additional polymorphic form of a maleate salt of tegaserod.
Example 1 : Preparation of sesqui-tefiaserod maleate Foπn H2 through tegaserod base
To a mixture of AGPΗI (112.7 g) in 283 mL of water was added 5-MICHO (45 g) followed by NaOH (52.8 g, 47%) and stirred at room temperature. After three hours, 522 mL of ethyl acetate were added and the mixture stirred for an additional four hours. After phase separation at 400C the organic phase was washed with water (3 x 218 ml), and filtrated under vacuum. The resulting solution was heated to 60 0C and a solution of maleic acid (14.4 g) in 45 mL water was dropped during half hour, and the reaction mixture stirred at the same temperature for an additional two hours. The mixture was cooled to 100C during one hour, kept under stirring at the same temperature for 12 hrs and then filtered under vacuum. The wet product was washed twice with 65 ml of ethyl acetate and dried in a vacuum oven at 45°C for 16 hours to give 85% of the product.
Example 2: Preparation of sesqui-tegaserod maleate Form H2
45 gr MICHO were added to a 1 L reactor at RT. A solution of 112.7 gr of AGP HI and 283 ml water was added to the reactor. 52.8 gr of NaOH 47% were added to the mixture while stirring. The mixture was heated to 400C and stirred for 12 hrs. 522 ml of Ethyl Acetate were added and the mixture was stirred for 4 hrs.
After phase separation at 400C the organic phase was washed with water (3 x 218 ml), and filtrated under vacuum.
The mixture was heated to 600C and a mixture o 14.4 gr of Maleic Acid in 45 ml water was dropped during 5 min.
The mixture was stirred at 600C for 2 hrs.
The mixture was cooled to 100C during 1 hour, stirred at 100C for 13 hrs and then filtered under vacuum. The wet product was washed twice with 65 ml of n-Propanol. The wet product was dried in a vacuum oven at 45°C.
Yield: 71.2%
Example 3: Preparation of Tegaserod maleate Form B from Sesqui-tegaserod maleate Form H2
6.9 g of maleic acid were added to a slurry of Sesqui-Tegaserod maleate Form H2 (41.5 g) in 208 ml n-propanol at room temperature. The mixture was stirred for 5 hours at the same temperature, filtered and washed with n-propanol. After drying on vacuum oven at 450C for 15 hours the product was analyzed by XRD and found to be Form B (89% yield).
The formation of hydrazones is catalyzed by both general acids and general bases. General base catalysis of dehydration of the tetrahedral intermediate involves nitrogen deprotonation concerted with elimination of hydroxide ion as shown in the Scheme (Sayer J.M., et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 4277). R fast O I H h° NH2R’ R- -NHR’ R R
In many cases, the equilibrium constant for their formation in aqueous solution is high. The additional stability may be attributed to the participation of the atom adjacent to the nitrogen in delocalized bonding. – + RRC = N – NH2 ~*→- RRC – N = NH2
In order to obtain only the maleic salt, the product when using an acid halide (HA) or other acids has to first be converted into the free base, before the addition of maleic acid (Path a), which results in an additional step to the synthesis. On the other hand, the reaction of the present invention in the presence of organic or inorganic base results in the formation of tegaserod free base which gives only the maleate salt after the addition of maleic acid (Path b).
HPLC method for detecting the level of the impurities:
Column: Atlantis dcl8(150*4.6),
Mobile phase: A.80% KH2PO4(0.02M) pH=5, 20% acetonitrile(ACN), B.100% ACN. Gradient: time 0= A: 100 B: 0, time 25 min= A:50%, B:50%, time 30 min= A:50%, B:50%, + 10 minutes of equilibration time. Wavelength= 225 nm
Sample concentration: 0.5 mg/mL
Temperature = 25°C
Example 1- Preparation of Tegaserod maleate in water with HCl.
To a mixture of AGP-HI (10.88 g, 0.04 mol) in 25 mL water was added 5-MICHO (3.50 g, 0.02 mol) followed by HCl (37%) until pH 4. The mixture was heated to reflux for 1 hour and then cooled to room temperature. To the resulting slurry was added a solution of NaHCO3 (10%) until pH 9, and heated to 65°C for 20 minutes. After cooling, 100 mL of EtOAc were added, and the organic phase washed with water. A solution of maleic acid (3.48 g, 0.03 mol) in 100 mL EtOAc was added, and the resulting solid was filtered off and washed with EtOAc to give 6.27 g of crude tegaserod maleate with a purity of 99.70% (by HPLC).
Example 2- Preparation of Tegaserod maleate in water with HCl in two steps. a. Preparation of Tegaserod free base.
To a mixture of AGP-HI (163.3 g, 0.6 mol) in 375 mL water was added 5-MICHO (52.5 g, 0.3 mol) followed by HCl (37%) until pH 4. The mixture was heated to reflux for 1 hour and then cooled to room temperature. To the resulting slurry was added a liter of a solution of NaHCO (10%) until pH 9, and heated to 65 °C for one hour. After cooling, 1500 mL of EtOAc were added, and the organic phase washed with water. The remaining organic phase was evaporated to dryness to give tegaserod free base with a purity of 87.42 % (by HPLC). b. Preparation of Tegaserod maleate. To a solution of 2 g of tegaserod free base in MeOH was added a solution of maleic acid (1.28 g, 0.011 mol) in 10 mL MeOH. The resulting solid was filtered off and washed with MeOH to give 1.09 g of crude tegaserod maleate with a purity of 96.81 % (by HPLC).
Example 3- Preparation of Tegaserod maleate in water with TEA.
To a mixture of AGP-HI (10.88 g, 0.04 mol) in 100 mL water was added 5-MICHO (3.50 g, 0.02 mol) followed by TEA (11.0 mL, 0.08 mol) and stirred at room temperature. After one hour, 25 mL of EtOAc was added, and the organic phase washed with water. A solution of maleic acid (3.48 g, 0.03 mol) in 100 mL EtOAc was added, and the resulting solid was filtered off and washed with EtOAc to give 7.92 g of crude tegaserod maleate with a purity of 94 % (by HPLC).
Example 4- Preparation of Tegaserod maleate in water with NaHCO3. To a mixture of AGP-HI (10.88 g, 0.04 mol) in 100 mL water was added 5-MICHO (3.50 g, 0.02 mol) followed by NaHCO3 (6.72 g, 0.08 mol) and heated to reflux for 1 hour. After cooling, 50 mL of EtOAc was added, and the organic phase washed with water. A solution of maleic acid (3.48 g, 0.03mol) in 100 mL EtOAc was added, and the resulting solid was filtered off and washed with EtOAc to give 6.71 g of crude tegaserod maleate with a purity of 98 % (by HPLC) .
Example 5- Preparation of Tegaserod maleate in water with NaHCO3 in two steps. a. Preparation of Tegaserod free base. To a mixture of AGP-HI (32.66 g, 0.12 mol) in 300 mL water was added 5-MICHO (10.51 g, 0.06 mol) followed by NaHCO3(20.16 g, 0.24 mol) and heated to reflux for 1 hour. After cooling, 150 mL of EtOAc was added, and the organic phase washed with water and evaporated to dryness to give 20.4 g of tegaserod free base (91.55%) purity by HPLC). b. Preparation of Tegaserod maleate.
To a solution of 2g of the resulting tegaserod free base in 8 mL MeOH was added a solution of maleic acid (1.28 g, 0.011 mol) in 5 mL MeOH. The resulting solid was filtered off and washed with MeOH to give 2.1 g of crude tegaserod maleate with a purity of 99.63 % (by HPLC).
Example 6- Preparation of Tegaserod maleate in water with Na2CO3. To a mixture of AGP-HI (10.88 g, 0.04 mol) in 100 mL water was added 5-MICHO (3.50 g, 0.02 mol) followed by Na2CO3 (4.24 g, 0.04 mol) and heated to reflux for 1 hour. After cooling, 50 mL of EtOAc was added, and the organic phase washed with water. A solution of maleic acid (3.48 g, 0.03 mol) in 100 mL EtOAc was added, and the resulting solid was filtered off and washed with EtOAc to give 6.48 g of crude tegaserod maleate with a purity of 98.2 % (by HPLC).
Example 7- Preparation of Tegaserod maleate in MeOH with TEA in two steps. a. Preparation of tegaserod free base
To a mixture of AGP-HI (10.88 g, 0.04 mol) in 25 mL MeOH was added 5-MICHO (3.50 g, 0.02 mol) followed by triethylamine (11.0 mL, 0.08 mol). After 1 h at room temperature the mixture was evaporated to dryness, and washed with water, giving 5.79 g of tegaserod free base (86.90 % purity by HPLC). b. Preparation of tegaserod maleate
To a solution of 2 g of the resulting tegaserod free base in 10 mL MeOH was added a solution of maleic acid (1.16 g, 0.01 mol) in water. The resulting solid was filtrated and washed with water to give 1.45 g of crude tegaserod maleate as a white solid (94.60 % purity by HPLC). Crystallization in MeOH improved the purity to 98.94% by HPLC.
Example 8- Preparation of Tegaserod maleate in IPA with K2CO3.
To a mixture of AGP-HI (10.88 g, 0.04 mol) in 25 mL IPA was added 5-MICHO (3.50 g, 0.02 mol) followed by K2CO3 (5.53g, 0.04 mol). After 22 h at room temperature the mixture was washed with brine. The organic phase was treated with a solution of maleic acid (3.48 g, 0.03 mol) in IPA. The resulting solid was filtrated and washed with IPA to give 3.26 g of a white solid (98.97% purity by HPLC).
Example 9- Preparation of Tegaserod maleate in TEA.
To a mixture of AGP-HI (10.88 g, 0.04 mol) and 5-MICHO (3.50 g, 0.02 mol) was added 11 mL of TEA (0.08 mol). After 2 h at room temperature 25 mL of EtOAc were added and the mixture was stirred for 1 h. The resulting solid was filtrated and washed with 25 mL EtOAc, to give 5.7 g of crude.
2 g of the residue was dissolved in 13 mL MeOH and treated with 7 mL of a solution of maleic acid (2.7 g, 0.023 mol) in water. The resulting solid was filtered and washed with water to give 1.5 g of tegaserod maleate (99.26 % purity by HPLC). Crystallization of the solid in MeOH improved the purity to 99.89%) by HPLC.
Example 10- Preparation of Tegaserod maleate in toluene/water with NaHCO3. a. Preparation of tegaserod free base To a mixture of AGP-HI (10.88 g, 0.04 mol) in 200 mL of water/toluene 1:1 was added 5-MICHO (3.50 g, 0.02 mol) followed by NaHCO3 (6.72 g, 0.08 mol) and heated to reflux for 1 hour. After cooling, the solid was filtrated out of the mixture and washed with water. After drying 6.25 g of tegaserod free base was obtained (93.8 % purity by HPLC). b. Preparation of tegaserod maleate To a solution of 3 g of the product in 10 mL MeOH was added a solution of maleic acid (2.31 g, 0.02 mol) in 10 mL water. The resulting solid was filtered off and washed with a solution of MeOH / water to give 2.50 g of crude tegaserod maleate with a purity of 96.6 % (by HPLC).
Example 11- Preparation of Tegaserod maleate in water with NaOH. a. Preparation of tegaserod free base
To a mixture of AGP-HI (10.88 g, 0.04 mol) in 25 mL of water was added 5-MICHO (3.50 g, 0.02 mol) followed by NaOH (2 g, 0.05 mol) and stirred at room temperature. After 3 hours 50 mL of EtOAc was added, and the organic phase washed with water and evaporated to dryness to give 5.6 g of tegaserod free base (98.80% purity by HPLC). b. Preparation of Tegaserod maleate.
To a solution of 1.6 g of tegaserod free base in 15 mL ethyl acetate was added a solution of maleic acid (0.7 g, 0.006 mol) in 5 mL ethyl acetate. The resulting solid was filtered off and washed with ethyl acetate to give 1.65 g of crude tegaserod maleate, with a purity of 99.87 % (by HPLC)
Example 12- Preparation of Tegaserod maleate in water with maleic acid. To a mixture of AGP-HI (10.88 g, 0.04 mol) in 25 mL of water was added 5-MICHO (3.50 g, 0.02 mol) followed by maleic acid (9.3 g, 0.08 mol) and heated to reflux for 1 hour. After cooling, the solid was filtrated out of the mixture and washed with water. After drying 6.92 g of tegaserod maleate crude was obtained (92.4 % purity by HPLC).
Example 13- Preparation of Tegaserod maleate in methanol with maleic acid.
To a mixture of AGP-HI (10.88 g, 0.04 mol) in 25 mL of methanol was added 5- MICHO (3.50 g, 0.02 mol) followed by maleic acid (9.29 g, 0.08 mol) and heated to reflux for 2 hours. After cooling, the solid was filtrated out of the mixture and washed with water. After drying 6.51 g of tegaserod maleate crude was obtained (97.4 % purity by HPLC).
Example 14- Preparation of Tegaserod maleate in water with NaOH in one pot. To a mixture of AGP-HI (10.88 g, 0.04 mol) in 25 mL of water was added 5-MICHO (3.50 g, 0.02 mol) followed by NaOH (2 g, 0.05 mol) and stirred at room temperature. After 4 hours a solution of maleic acid (4.35 g, 0.0375 mol) in 25 mL water was added, and the reaction mixture was stirred overnight. The resulting solid was filtered off and washed with water to give 7.87 g of crude tegaserod maleate (99.16% purity by HPLC).
Example 15- Preparation of Tegaserod maleate in water with NaOH in one pot.
To a mixture of AGP-HI (174.2 g, 0.64 mol) in 362 mL of water was added 5-MICHO (56.2 g, 0.32 mol) followed by NaOH (68.1 g, 47%) and stirred at room temperature. After 4.5 hours, 640 mL of EtOAc was added, and the organic phase washed with water, treated with active carbon and filtrated through hyper flow bed. A solution of maleic acid (44.57 g, 0.38 mol) in 415 mL ethyl acetate / water 97:3 was added, and the reaction mixture was heating to 65 °C and stirrer overnight. The resulting solid was filtered off and washed with water and ethyl acetate to give 121.4 g of crude tegaserod maleate (up to 99.88 % purity by HPLC).
Example 16- Preparation of Tegaserod maleate (from Tegaserod acetate).
To a solution of 8.2 g of tegaserod acetate in 15 mL ethyl acetate heated to 65 °C was added a solution of 3.3 g maleic acid in 5 ml ethyl acetate/water 95:5, and the mixture was stirred at the same temperature for an additional 2 hours, followed by cooling to room temperature and stirring overnight. The resulting solid was filtered off and washed with ethyl acetate/water 95:5. After drying on vacuum oven at 45 °C for 15 hours, 9.18 g of tegaserod maleate were obtained. Tegaserod acetate is prepared according to Examples 19, 20 and 21 of U.S. Appl. No. 11/015,875 and PCT/US04/42822.
Example 19 of U.S. Appl. No. 11/015,875 reads as follows: A slurry of tegaserod base amorphous (6 g) in 50 mL ethyl acetate was stirred at 20- 30 °C for 24 hours. The solid was filtrated and washed with 15 mL of same solvent and dried in a vacuum oven at 40 °C for 16 hours.
Example 20 of U.S. Appl. No. 11/015,875 reads as follows:
A slurry of tegaserod base amorphous (6 g) in 50 mL ethyl acetate was stirred at reflux for 24 hours. The solid was filtrated and washed with 15 mL of same solvent and dried in a vacuum oven at 40 °C for 16 hours.
Example 21 of U.S. Appl. No. 11/015,875 reads as follows:
To a slurry of tegaserod maleate Form A (15 g) in EtOAc (210 mL) and water (210 mL) was added 38.4 g of NaOH 47%. The mixture was stirred overnight and the resulting white solid was isolated by filtration and washed with 100 mL of water. Drying in vacuum oven at 40 °C for 16 hours gives 12.38 g (90% yield). Tegaserod acetate was characterized by H and C-NMR.
Example 17: General method for the preparation of Tegaserod maleate Form A from crystallization.
Tegaserod maleate (1 g) was combined with the appropriate solvent (5 mL), and heated to reflux. Then, additional solvent was added until complete dissolution. After the compound was dissolved, the oil bath was removed and the solution was cooled to room temperature. The solid was filtrated and washed with 5 mL of the same solvent and dried in a vacuum oven at 40 C for 16 hours.
Example 18: Preparation of Tegaserod maleate in water with p-TSOH.
To a mixture of AGP-HI (10.88 g, 0.04 mol) in 25 mL water was added 5-MICHO (3.50 g, 0.02 mol) followed by para-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (0.45 g, 0.0024 mol). The mixture was heated to reflux for 4 hour and then cooled to room temperature. The resulting solid was filtered off and washed with water to give 8.32 g of a white solid (84.74 % purity by HPLC).
Example 19: Preparation of Tegaserod maleate from Tegaserod Hemi-maleate hemihydrate
To a solution of 1.72 g of Tegaserod Hemi-maleate hemihydrate in 20 mL ethyl acetate at room temperature was added a solution of 0.134 g maleic acid in 5 ml ethyl acetate/water 95:5, and the mixture was stirred at the same temperature for overnight. The resulting solid was filtered off and washed with ethyl acetate/water 95:5. After drying on vacuum oven at 45°C for 15 hours, 1.68 g of tegaserod maleate were obtained. Tegaserod Hemi-maleate hemihydrate was prepared according to Example 23 of U.S. Appl. No. 11/015,875 and PCT/US04/42822. Example 23 of U.S. Appl. No. 11/015,875 and PCT/US04/42822 reads as follows: A solution of maleic acid (2.32 g in 22 mL ethyl acetate/water 97:3) was added to a mixture of tegaserod base in ethyl acetate, and the reaction mixture was heated to 65 °C and stirrer overnight. The resulting solid was filtered off and washed with water and ethyl acetate. Drying in vacuum oven at 40 °C for 16 hours gives 12.19 g of Tegaserod hemi-maleate hemihydrate. Depending on the base polymorph used a solution or slurry is obtained. When using amorphous tegaserod base, a solution is obtained, while when using any other base polymorph of tegaserod, a slurry is obtained.
Tegaserod, chemically named 2-[(5-methoxy-liϊ-indol-3-yl)methylene]-IV-pentylhydrazine- carboximidamide, is a selective serotonin 4 (5-HT4) receptor agonist, which can be used to treat gastrointestinal disorders such as heartburn, bloating, postoperative ileus, abdominal pain and discomfort, epigastric pain, nausea, vomiting, regurgitation, intestinal pseudoobstruction, irritable bowel syndrome and gastro-oesophageal reflux. Tegaserod as the maleate salt is marketed for the short-term treatment of irritable bowel syndrome in women whose primary bowel symptom is constipation.
Tegaserod, represented by the formula (I), was first described in US 5 510 353 as well as processes for its preparation. The maleate salt of tegaserod is also disclosed, but interestingly a method of manufacturing tegaserod maleate is not disclosed. The only characterizing data is the melting point which is disclosed as 1900C for the maleate salt and 124°C for the tegaserod base.
WO 2006/116953 describes crystalline forms of the hydrobromide, dihydrogen phosphate and oxalate salts of tegaserod. Also claimed is a process for preparing the hydrochloride, hydrobromide, dihydrogen phosphate, tartrate, citrate, lactate, mesylate, oxalate, succinate, glutarate, adipate, salicylate, sulfate, mandelate, camphor sulfonate and hydrogen sulfate salts of tegaserod from a specific crystalline form of tegaserod base. Another process described is a method of preparing the dihydrogen phosphate, maleate, tartrate, citrate, mesylate, lactate, succinate, oxalate, hydrochloride, salicylate, glutarate, adipate, hydrobromide, sulfate and hydrogen sulfate from a hydrogen halide salt of tegaserod.
There are often major hurdles to overcome before an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) can be formulated into a composition that can be marketed. For example, the rate of dissolution of an API that has poor aqueous solubility is often problematic. The aqueous solubility is a major influence on the bioavailability of the API such that a poorly soluble API can mean the API is not available to have a pharmaceutical effect on the body. The API can also cause problems during manufacture of a pharmaceutical composition. For example, flowability, compactability and stickiness are all factors affected by the solid state properties of an API.
It has thus always been an aim of the pharmaceutical industry to provide many forms of an API in order to mitigate the problems described above. Different salts, crystalline forms also known as polymorphs, solvates and amorphous forms are all forms of an API that can have different physiochemical and biological characteristics. Indeed, it has been discovered that the tegaserod maleate product on the market, Zelnorm , has been linked to an increase in heart problems in a proportion of individuals. One possible reason is that the maleate moiety reacts with the tegaserod, resulting over time in the production of a toxic impurity.
This impurity could be a contributor to the heart problems seen in some patients.
Figure 1 is a x-ray powder diffraction pattern of tegaserod maleate Form I. Figure 2 is a x-ray powder diffraction pattern of tegaserod maleate Form II. Figure 3 is a x-ray powder diffraction pattern of tegaserod maleate Form III. Figure 4 is a x-ray powder diffraction pattern of tegaserod maleate Form IV. x-Ray powder diffraction spectrum was measured on a Siemens D5000 x- ray powder diffractometer having a copper-Kα radiation.
The following examples further illustrate the invention.
Example 1 Tegaserod free base (10 gm) is dissolved in acetone (100 ml). Maleic acid (4 gm) is added to the solution and the contents are maintained for 1 hour at 25°C. The separated solid is filtered to give 12.5 gm of tegaserod maleate Form I.
Example 2 Tegaserod maleate Form II (5 gm) and acetone (70 ml) are mixed and refluxed for 1 hour and cooled to 25°C and filtered to give 4.8 gm of tegaserod maleate Form I.
Example 3 Tegaserod maleate Form I (10 gm) is dissolved in methanol (100 ml). Acetonitrile (150 ml) is added to the solution and the contents are heated to reflux. The contents are then cooled to 25°C and maintained for 30 minutes. The separated crystals are collected by filtration to give 9 gm of tegaserod maleate Form II.
Example 4 Tegaserod free base (10 gm) is dissolved in methanol (100 ml) and maleic acid (4 gm) is added to the solution. Then the contents are maintained for 30 minutes at 25°C. Then the separated solid is filtered to give 13 gm of tegaserod maleate Form III.
Example 5
Tegaserod maleate (5 gm) is dissolved in methanol (50 ml) and the solution is maintained at 25°C for 30 minutes. The separated crystals are collected by filtration to give 4.8 gm of tegaserod maleate Form III. Example 6 Tegaserod free base (10 gm) is dissolved in methanol (50 ml), maleic acid (4 gm) is added and the contents are refluxed for 30 minutes and then the resulting solution is cooled to 25°C. Methylene dichloride (200 ml) is added and the contents are maintained for 30 minutes at 25°C. The separated solid is collected by filtration to give 13 gm of tegaserod maleate Form IV.
Example 7 Maleic acid (4 gm) is added to a solution of tegaserod free base (10 gm) in methanol (50 ml). The contents are maintained for 30 minutes at 25°C and isopropyl alcohol (150 ml) is mixed and contents are maintained for 30 minutes at 25°C. The separated solid is collected by filtration to give 12.5 gm of tegaserod maleate Form IV
Beattie DT, Smith JA, Marquess D, Vickery RG, Armstrong SR, Pulido-Rios T, McCullough JL, Sandlund C, Richardson C, Mai N, Humphrey PP: The 5-HT4 receptor agonist, tegaserod, is a potent 5-HT2B receptor antagonist in vitro and in vivo. Br J Pharmacol. 2004 Nov;143(5):549-60. Epub 2004 Oct 4. [PubMed:15466450]
Talley NJ: Irritable bowel syndrome. Intern Med J. 2006 Nov;36(11):724-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2006.01217.x. [PubMed:17040359]
Borman RA, Tilford NS, Harmer DW, Day N, Ellis ES, Sheldrick RL, Carey J, Coleman RA, Baxter GS: 5-HT(2B) receptors play a key role in mediating the excitatory effects of 5-HT in human colon in vitro. Br J Pharmacol. 2002 Mar;135(5):1144-51. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704571. [PubMed:11877320]
Vickers AE, Zollinger M, Dannecker R, Tynes R, Heitz F, Fischer V: In vitro metabolism of tegaserod in human liver and intestine: assessment of drug interactions. Drug Metab Dispos. 2001 Oct;29(10):1269-76. [PubMed:11560869]
FDA approves the reintroduction of ZelnormImage may be NSFW. Clik here to view. (tegaserod) for Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation (IBS-C) in women under 65 [Link]
EMA Refusal Assessment Report for Zelnorm (Tegaserod) [File]
FDA Joint Meeting of the Gastrointestinal Drugs Advisory Committee and Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee Briefing Document for Zelnorm (tegaserod maleate) [File]
BUCHHEIT K H ET AL: “THE SEROTONIN 5-HT4 RECEPTOR. 2. STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY STUDIES OF THE INDOLE CARBAZIMIDAMIDE CLASS OF AGONISTS” JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY. WASHINGTON, US, vol. 38, 1995, pages 2331-2338, XP000867864 ISSN: 0022-2623 cited in the application *
GRAUL A ET AL: “TEGASEROD MALEATE” DRUGS OF THE FUTURE, BARCELONA, ES, vol. 24, no. 1, 1999, pages 38-44, XP000874672 ISSN: 0377-8282 *
LALEZARI ET AL.: “Selective synthesis of …” J. HETEROCYCL. CHEM., vol. 8, 1971, pages 689-691, XP002354978 *
WAN ET AL.: “Improved synthesis of tegaserod maleate” CHINESE J. MED. CHEM., vol. 13, no. 1, 2003, pages 40-41, XP009057178 *
WO2004085393A1 *2003-03-252004-10-07Hetero Drugs LimitedNovel crystalline forms of tegaserod maleate
WO2006116953A1 *2005-05-022006-11-09Zentiva, A.S.A method for the preparation of tegaserod and slected salts thereof
WO2007084761A1 *2006-01-182007-07-26Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.Maleate salt of tegaserod and crystalline forms thereof
WO2007084761A1 *2006-01-182007-07-26Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.Maleate salt of tegaserod and crystalline forms thereof
WO2007120924A1 *2006-04-172007-10-25Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.Preparation of tegaserod maleate free of iodide
WO2007126889A1 *2006-03-272007-11-08Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.Preparation of tegaserod acetate
WO2007146717A3 *2006-06-122008-03-27Joginder S BajwaProcess for making salts of n-hydroxy-3-[4-[[[2-(2-methyl-1h-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amino]methyl]phenyl]-2e-2-propenamide
EP1955998A1 *2007-02-072008-08-13Chemo Ibérica, S.A.New addition salt of N-amino-N’-pentylguanidine, the process for its preparation and use thereof for obtaining tegaserod
WO2010015794A1 *2008-08-072010-02-11Generics [Uk] LimitedNovel polymorphic forms of tegaserod
CL2008000070A1 *2007-01-172008-07-25Lg Life Sciences LtdMaleic acid mono (3 – [({1 – [(2-amino-9 H -purin-9-yl) methyl] cyclopropyl} oxy) methyl] -8,8-dimethyl-3,7-dioxo-2,4 , 6-trioxa-3 lambda 5 -phosphanon-1-yl pivalate; pharmaceutical composition comprising said mono, and use to treat virus h
US5510353A *1991-03-221996-04-23Sandoz Ltd.Certain aminoguanidine compounds, pharmaceutical compositions containing them and their use in treating gastrointestinal motility disorders and disorders associated with cephalic pain
US20060178519A1 *2004-12-232006-08-10Venkataraman SundaramProcess for preparing tegaserod
Family To Family Citations
WO2006116953A1 *2005-05-022006-11-09Zentiva, A.S.A method for the preparation of tegaserod and slected salts thereof
CN100412059C *2006-06-062008-08-20江苏奥赛康药业有限公司Preparation method of tegaserod
InChI=1S/C16H23N5O/c1-3-4-5-8-18-16(17)21-20-11-12-10-19-15-7-6-13(22-2)9-14(12)15/h6-7,9-11,19H,3-5,8H2,1-2H3,(H3,17,18,21)/b20-11+Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Key:IKBKZGMPCYNSLU-RGVLZGJSSA-NImage may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
CAS Name: (6R,7R)-7-[[(2R)-Hydroxyphenylacetyl]amino]-3-[[(1-methyl-1H-tetrazol-5-yl)thio]methyl]-8-oxo-5-thia-1-azabicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene-2-carboxylic acid
Percent Composition: C 46.74%, H 3.92%, N 18.17%, O 17.30%, S 13.87%
Literature References: Broad-spectrum semi-synthetic cephalosporin antibiotic. Prepn: C. W. Ryan, DE2018600; idem,US3641021 (1970, 1972 to Lilly); J. M. Greene, DE2312997; idem,US3840531 (1973, 1974 to Lilly). Biological properties: W. E. Wick, D. A. Preston, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.1, 221 (1972). Antibacterial activity: S. Eykyn et al.,ibid.3, 657 (1973); H. C. Neu, ibid.6, 177 (1974); A. D. Russell, J. Antimicrob. Chemother.1, 97 (1975). Pharmacologic studies: B. R. Meyers et al.,Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.9, 140 (1976); R. S. Griffith et al.,ibid.10, 814 (1976). Comprehensive description: R. H. Bishara, E. C. Rickard, Anal. Profiles Drug Subs.9, 125-154 (1980).
Chemical name:[6R-[6α,7β(R*)]]-7-[(hydroxyphenylacetyl)amino]-3-[[(1-methyl-1H-tetrazol-5-yl)thio]methyl]-8-oxo-5-thia-1-azabicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene-2-carboxylic acid
The chemical structure of cefamandole, like that of several other cephalosporins, contains an N-methylthiotetrazole (NMTT or 1-MTT) side chain. As the antibiotic is broken down in the body, it releases free NMTT, which can cause hypoprothrombinemia (likely due to inhibition of the enzymevitamin K epoxide reductase)(vitamin K supplement is recommended during therapy) and a reaction with ethanol similar to that produced by disulfiram (Antabuse), due to inhibition of aldehyde dehydrogenase.
Cefamandole has a broad spectrum of activity and can be used to treat bacterial infections of the skin, bones and joints, urinary tract, and lower respiratory tract. The following represents cefamandole MIC susceptibility data for a few medically significant microorganisms.
CO2 is generated during the normal constitution of cefamandole and ceftazidime, potentially resulting in an explosive-like reaction in syringes.[2]
SYNTHESIS
US 3641021
US 3840531 US 3974153 US 3903278 US 2018600 US 2065621 DE 2018600 DE 2065621 DE 2730579
DE 2312997
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
SYN
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
The formylation of 7-aminocephalosporanic acid (I) by the usual techniques produces 7-formamidocephalosporanic acid (II), which is then treated with the sodium salt of 1-methyl-1H-tetrazole-5-thiol (III) to yield 7-formamido-3-(1-methyl-1H-tetrazol-5-ylthio)methyl-3-cephem-4-carboxylic acid (IV). The resulting product (IV) is deformylated affording 7-amino-3-(1-methyl-1H-tetrazol-5-ylthio)methyl-3-cephem-4-carboxylic acid (V), which is finally acylated with anhydro-O-carboxymandelic acid (VI) using the usual techniques.
^Stork CM (2006). “Antibiotics, antifungals, and antivirals”. In Nelson LH, Flomenbaum N, Goldfrank LR, Hoffman RL, Howland MD, Lewin NA. Goldfrank’s toxicologic emergencies. New York: McGraw-Hill. p. 847. ISBN0-07-143763-0. Retrieved 2009-07-03.
US 3 641 021 (Lilly; 8.2.1972; appl. 18.4.1969).
DE 2 018 600 (Lilly; appl. 17.4.1970; USA-prior. 18.4.1969).
DAS 2 065 621 (Lilly; appl. 17.4.1970; USA-prior. 18.4.1969).
US 3 840 531 (Lilly; 8.10.1974; appl. 21.3.1972).
US 3 903 278 (Smith Kline Corp.; 2.9.1975; prior. 4.11.1971).
DOS 2 730 579 (Pierrel S.p.A.; appl. 6.7.1977; GB-prior. 10.7.1976).
preparation and/or purification via the trimethylsilyl-derivatives:
DOS 2 711 095 (Lilly; appl. 14.3.1977; USA-prior. 17.3.1976).
purification:
US 4 115 644 (Lilly; 19.9.1978; appl. 19.9.1978).
DOS 2 839 670 (Lilly; appl. 12.9.1978; USA-prior. 19.9.1977).
crystalline sodium salt:
US 4 054 738 (Lilly; 18.10.1977; appl. 22.12.1975).
US 4 168 376 (Lilly; 18.9.1979; appl. 5.6.1978).
lithium salt:
GB 1 546 757 (Lilly; appl. 10.4.1975; valid from 7.4.1976).
O-formyl-derivative:
US 3 928 592 (Lilly; 23.12.1975; appl. 21.2.1974).
InChI=1S/C18H18N6O5S2/c1-23-18(20-21-22-23)31-8-10-7-30-16-11(15(27)24(16)12(10)17(28)29)19-14(26)13(25)9-5-3-2-4-6-9/h2-6,11,13,16,25H,7-8H2,1H3,(H,19,26)(H,28,29)/t11-,13-,16-/m1/s1Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Key:OLVCFLKTBJRLHI-AXAPSJFSSA-NImage may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Peficitinib hydrobromide is used in the treatment of Psoriasis and Rheumatoid Arthritis
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Peficitinib (formerly known as ASP015K) is a pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridine derivative orally administered once-daily JAK inhibitor in development for the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. In preclinical studied Peficitinib inhibited JAK1 and JAK3 with IC50 of 3.9 and 0.7 nM, respectively. Peficitinib also inhibited IL-2-dependent T cell proliferation in vitro and STAT5 phosphorylation in vitro and ex vivo. Furthermore, Peficitinib dose-dependently suppressed bone destruction and paw swelling in an adjuvant-induced arthritis model in rats via prophylactic or therapeutic oral dosing regimens.In clinical trials, Peficitinib treatment prescribed at 50, 100 and 150 mg amounts each showed statistically significantly higher ACR20 response rates compared to the placebo and response rates increased up to the 150 mg dosage. Adverse events included neutropenia, headache, and abdominal pain. The treatment-emergent adverse events occurring more frequently in the Peficitinib group compared with the placebo group included diarrhea, nasopharyngitis, and increased serum creatine phosphokinase activity. No cases of serious infections were reported. Herpes zoster occurred in four patients (two each in the peficitinib 25 and 100 mg cohorts). The authors concluded that treatment with peficitinib as monotherapy for 12 weeks in Japanese patients with moderate to severe RA is efficacious and showed an acceptable safety profile.
Janus kinases (JAKs) are considered promising targets for the treatment of autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid arthritis (RA) due to their important role in multiple cytokine receptorsignaling pathways. Recently, several JAK inhibitors have been developed for the treatment of RA. Here, we describe the identification of the novel orally bioavailable JAK inhibitor 18, peficitinib (also known as ASP015K), which showed moderate selectivity for JAK3 over JAK1, JAK2, and TYK2 in enzyme assays. Chemical modification at the C4-position of lead compound5 led to a large increase in JAK inhibitory activity and metabolic stability in liver microsomes. Furthermore, we determined the crystal structures of JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and TYK2 in a complex with peficitinib, and revealed that the 1H-pyrrolo[2,3–b]pyridine-5-carboxamide scaffold of peficitinib forms triple hydrogen bonds with the hinge region. Interestingly, the binding modes of peficitinib in the ATP-binding pockets differed among JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and TYK2. WaterMap analysis of the crystal structures suggests that unfavorable water molecules are the likely reason for the difference in orientation of the 1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridine-5-carboxamide scaffold to the hinge region among JAKs.
Diseases that have good JAK3 inhibitory activity and are caused by undesired cytokine signaling (eg rejection in living transplantation, rheumatism, psoriasis, autoimmune diseases, asthma, atopic dermatitis, Alzheimer’s disease, atherosclerosis etc. Patent Document 1 discloses fused heterocyclic compounds and salts thereof which are useful as therapeutic agents and / or prophylactic agents for diseases (eg, cancer, leukemia, etc.) caused by abnormal cytokine signaling. Among them, 4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H-pyrrolo represented by the following formula (I) disclosed in the example compound Ex121 [2,3-b] pyridine-5-carboxamide exhibits good activity, and is particularly a compound expected as a therapeutic agent for suppressing rejection during organ / tissue transplantation, rheumatism, psoriasis and the like.
[Chemical formula 1] Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
The solid stability of a compound which has become a drug development candidate is an important factor both in industrial operation and in maintaining quality. In the stability of the drug substance itself, it is necessary to evaluate the stability of the quality necessary to maintain the efficacy and safety of the drug, and to obtain the information necessary for setting the storage method and the shelf life of the drug. For this reason, the stability test is considered to be one of the most important tests in the manufacture of pharmaceuticals (Heat measurement, 2004, 31 (2), pp. 80-86).
Patent Document 1 discloses the free form of the compound of the formula (I) but does not disclose as a crystal. There is a need for a drug substance which is more suitable for formulation, and is physically and chemically stable from the viewpoint of quality assurance.
Example 1
(Production Method of Hydrobromide Salt Form B 45)
(In the Case of Addition of Seed Crystals )
After nitrogen substitution, the reaction vessel was charged with 4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy- 2-adamantyl] amino} -1H-pyrrolo [2,3-b] pyridine-5-carboxamide (145.0 kg), water (377 L), EtOH (1508 L), 48% hydrobromic acid (74.9 kg) It charged sequentially at room temperature and started stirring. 48% hydrobromic acid was added, taking care that the pH was in the range of 1.5 to 1.9. The reaction mixture was heated and stirred until the internal temperature reached 70 ° C. or higher. After confirming that the solution was completely dissolved, the solution was stirred for 5 minutes or more, and the solution was subjected to clear filtration at an internal temperature of 70 ° C. or higher, and the pot and line were washed with warm EtOH (290 L). At an internal temperature of about 50 ° C., 4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H-pyrrolo [2,3-b] pyridine-5-carboxamide odor Hydrochloric acid salt seed crystals (B45, 145 g) were added, and the mixture was ripened and stirred overnight at an internal temperature of 40 to 50 ° C. Subsequently, the mixture was cooled to an internal temperature of 20 to 30 ° C. over 1 hour or more, and the mixture was aged and stirred at the same temperature for 1 hour or more. At an internal temperature of 20 to 30 ° C., EtOAc (4350 L) was added dropwise over 1 hour, and the mixture was aged and stirred overnight at the same temperature. The precipitated crystals were filtered. The wet crystals were washed with a solution of EtOH / EtOAc (145 L / 290 L). The wet crystals are dried under reduced pressure at an external temperature of 40 ° C. overnight under reduced pressure to give 4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H-pyrrolo [2,3 -b] Pyridine-5-carboxamide hydrobromide crystal (B45, 161 kg) was obtained.
[0037]
(Another method of producing hydrobromide salt B45 type crystal)
(In the case of no addition of seed crystals) After
sufficiently drying the reaction vessel and replacing with nitrogen, water (585 L) is charged and subsequently 4- {[ (1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H-pyrrolo [2,3-b] pyridine-5-carboxamide (225 kg), EtOH (2250 L) was charged Stirring was started. The internal temperature was adjusted to 25 ° C., and 48% hydrobromic acid (127.8 kg) was charged at the same temperature, and the vessel and kettle wall were washed with EtOH (90 L). After the completion of the charging, it was confirmed that the reaction solution had been dissolved, the pH was measured, and the pH was confirmed to be in the range of 1.5 to 1.9. When the pH was out of the range, the pH was adjusted to a predetermined pH using 48% hydrobromic acid (48% hydrobromic acid: about 11.6 kg). The temperature was raised until the internal temperature reached 70 ° C., and after confirmation of dissolution, the mixture was stirred for 5 minutes or more. The solution was subjected to clear filtration while maintaining the internal temperature at 60 ° C. or higher, and washed through a filter from a dissolution vessel with warm EtOH (450 L) preheated to 50 ° C. or higher. The clarified filtrate was gradually cooled to an internal temperature of 45 ° C., and filtered EtOAc (6750 L) was added dropwise over 6 hours at an internal temperature of 45 ° C. After the dropping was completed, the mixture was stirred at an internal temperature of 45 ° C. for 10 hours or more. Subsequently, it was cooled to an internal temperature of 25 ° C. using a follow-up temperature control cooler, and stirred at an internal temperature of 25 ° C. for 3 hours. The predetermined supernatant concentration and the crystal form of the precipitated crystals were confirmed and filtered. A mixed solvent of EtOH / EtOAc (225 L / 450 L) was prepared and cake washed using this mixed solvent. The obtained wet crystals are dried under reduced pressure at an external temperature of 40 ° C. for 10 hours or more, and 4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H-pyrrolo [ 2,3-b] pyridine-5-carboxamido hydrobromide crystal (B45, 250 kg) was obtained.
[0038]
1 H-NMR (600 MHz, d 6 -DMSO) δ: 1.49 (2 H, m), 1. 68 (2 H, m), 1.71 (2 H, m), 1. 80 (2 H, m), 1. 91 (2 H, m), 2.10 (1H, m), 2.20 (2 H, m), 3. 70-4.00 (1 H, brs), 4. 28 (1 H, m), 6. 66 (1 H, m), 7. 39 (1 H, m), 7. 75 (1 H, brs), 8. 38 (1 H, brs), 8.5 5 (1 H, s), 11. 17 (1 H, d, 7.8 Hz), 12.5 (1 H, brs), 14. 17 (1 H, brs)
Elemental analysis: theoretical value: C 53.08%, H 5.69% , N 13.76%, O 7.86% , Br 19.62%;
Found:. C 53.02%, H 5.74 %, N 13.73%, Br 19.42%
molecular composition: C 18 H 22 N 4 O 2 . HBr
MS: 327.0 (M From the result of + H) +
elemental analysis, 4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H-pyrrolo [2,3-b] pyridine-5 The carboxamido hydrobromide was a monohydrobromide.
[0039]
Example 2
(hydrobromide A87 crystal)
4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H-pyrrolo [2,3-b] Pyridine-5-carboxamide (6.0 g) was charged in EtOH / water (57.6 mL / 14.4 mL). At 50-60 ° C., 48% hydrobromic acid was added, stirred for 15 minutes more, and washed with EtOH (18 mL). At 45 ° C.-55 ° C. EtOAc (180 mL) was added dropwise over 30 minutes. Crystals were precipitated upon stirring at 15 ° C to 25 ° C. The crystals were collected by filtration and washed with a mixed solvent of EtOH / EtOAc (6 mL / 12 mL). The crystals are dried under vacuum and 4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H-pyrrolo [2,3-b] pyridine-5-carboxamide odor Seed crystals of hydrofluoride (Form A87, 6.11 g) were obtained.
4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H-pyrrolo [2,3-b] pyridine-5-carboxamide (3.0 g), EtOH (24 mL), water (6 mL), and 48% hydrobromic acid (1.55 g) were charged sequentially at room temperature. After charging, the mixture was heated to an internal temperature of 60 ° C. or higher and stirred. After confirming that the solution was completely in solution, the solution was subjected to clear filtration at an internal temperature of 60 ° C. or higher, and washed with warm EtOH (9 mL). EtOH (21 mL) is added dropwise at an internal temperature of 70 ° C. or higher, and 4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H at an internal temperature of 70 ° C. Seed crystals (A87, 30 mg) of pyrrolo [2,3-b] pyridine-5-carboxamide hydrobromide were added, and the mixture was ripened and stirred overnight at an internal temperature of 65 to 70 ° C. Subsequently, it was cooled to an internal temperature of 20 to 30 ° C., and ripening stirring was carried out at the same temperature overnight. At an internal temperature of 20 to 30 ° C., EtOAc (90 mL) was added dropwise over 1 hour, and the mixture was aged and stirred at the same temperature for 1 hour or more. The precipitated crystals were collected by filtration. The wet crystals were washed with a solution of EtOH / EtOAc (3 mL / 12 mL). The wet crystals are dried overnight under vacuum and 4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H-pyrrolo [2,3-b] pyridine-5-carboxamide Hydrobromide crystal (Form A87, 3.09 g) was obtained.
[0040]
Example 3
(hydrobromide A61 crystal)
4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H-pyrrolo [2,3-b] Pyridine-5-carboxamide (5.0 g), EtOH (48 mL), water (12 mL), and 48% hydrobromic acid (2.58 g) were charged sequentially at room temperature. After charging, the mixture was heated to an internal temperature of 70 ° C. and stirred. After confirming complete dissolution, the solution was clarified by filtration at an internal temperature of 70 ° C., and washed with warm EtOH (15 mL). The internal temperature was cooled to 50 to 60 ° C., and EtOAc (150 mL) was added dropwise over 1 hour at the same temperature. After the addition was completed, the solution was gradually cooled to 20 to 30 ° C., and the mixture was aged and stirred at the same temperature for 1 hour or more. The precipitated crystals were collected by filtration. The wet crystals were washed with a solution of EtOH / EtOAc (5 mL / 10 mL). The wet crystals are dried overnight under vacuum and 4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H-pyrrolo [2,3-b] pyridine-5-carboxamide Hydrobromide crystal (Form A61, 5.19 g) was obtained.
[0041]
Example 4
(hydrobromide A36 type crystal)
4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H-pyrrolo [2,3-b] To a suspension of pyridine-5-carboxamide (500 mg) in EtOAc, 48% hydrobromic acid (258 μL) was added, and the mixture was stirred with heating under reflux for 1 hour, and further allowed to cool to room temperature. The precipitated crystals were collected by filtration and washed with EtOAc. The resulting crystals are dried at 60 ° C. under reduced pressure to give 4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H-pyrrolo [2,3-]. b] Pyridine-5-carboxamide monohydrobromide crystal (Form A36, 625 mg) was obtained.
[0042]
Example 5
(B11-type crystal of hydrobromide monohydrate)
4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H-pyrrolo [2 , 3-b] Pyridine-5-carboxamide (5.0 g), EtOH (48 mL), water (12 mL), 48% hydrobromic acid (2.58 g) were sequentially charged at room temperature. After charging, the mixture was heated to an internal temperature of 70 ° C. or higher and stirred. After confirming that the solution had completely dissolved, the solution was subjected to clear filtration at an internal temperature of 70 ° C. or higher, and washed with warm EtOH (15 mL). 4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H-pyrrolo [2,3-b] pyridine-5-carboxamide odor at an internal temperature of about 35 ° C. Hydrochloric acid salt seed crystals (A87, 49.0 mg) were added, and the mixture was aged with an internal temperature of 30 to 40 ° C. for 4 hours. Subsequently, the mixture was cooled to an internal temperature of 20 to 30 ° C., and aged and stirred overnight at the same temperature. At an internal temperature of 20-25 ° C., EtOAc (150 mL) was added dropwise over 1 hour, and the mixture was aged and stirred at the same temperature for 30 minutes or longer. The precipitated crystals were collected by filtration. The wet crystals were washed with a solution of EtOH / EtOAc (5 mL / 10 mL). The wet crystals are dried overnight under vacuum and 4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H-pyrrolo [2,3-b] pyridine-5-carboxamide Hydrobromide monohydrate crystal (Form B11, 5.24 g) was obtained.
[0043]
Example 6
(B21-type crystal of hydrobromide dihydrate)
4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H-pyrrolo [2 , 3-b] Pyridine-5-carboxamide (5.0 g), EtOH (18 mL), water (12 mL), 48% hydrobromic acid (2.58 g) were sequentially charged at room temperature. After charging, the mixture was heated to an internal temperature of 60 ° C. or higher and stirred. After confirming that the solution was completely dissolved, the solution was subjected to clear filtration at an internal temperature of 60 ° C. or higher, and washed with warm EtOH (10 mL). The mixture was cooled to an internal temperature of about 45 to 50 ° C. and aged for 2 hours while stirring. Subsequently, the reaction solution is cooled to an internal temperature of 20 to 30 ° C., and aged at the same temperature and stirred overnight. At an internal temperature of 20 to 30 ° C., EtOAc (160 mL) was added dropwise over 1 hour, and the mixture was aged and stirred for 1 hour or more at the same temperature. The precipitated crystals were filtered. The wet crystals were washed with a solution of EtOH / EtOAc (3 mL / 12 mL). The wet crystals are dried overnight under vacuum and 4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H-pyrrolo [2,3-b] pyridine-5-carboxamide Hydrobromide dihydrate crystals (Form B21, 6.05 g) were obtained.
[0044]
Example 7
(Tautomerism of each crystal)
[0045]
Example 7-1
(Crystal form conversion; hydrobromide B21 → A61)
4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H- Pyrrolo [2,3-b] pyridine-5-carboxamide hydrobromide dihydrate (Form B21, 300 mg) and EtOH (3 mL) were sequentially charged at room temperature and suspended overnight. After suspension, the crystals were collected by filtration at room temperature and the wet crystals were washed with EtOH. The wet crystals are dried overnight under vacuum and 4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H-pyrrolo [2,3-b] pyridine-5-carboxamide Hydrobromide crystal (Form A61, 258 mg) was obtained.
[0046]
Example 7-2
(Crystal form conversion; hydrobromide B11 → B21)
4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H- Pyrrolo [2,3-b] pyridine-5-carboxamide hydrobromide monohydrate (form B11, 2.0 g), EtOH (7 mL), water (3 mL) were sequentially charged at room temperature and suspended overnight. It became cloudy. After suspension, the crystals were collected by filtration at room temperature and the wet crystals were washed with 70% aqueous EtOH. The wet crystals are dried overnight under vacuum and 4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H-pyrrolo [2,3-b] pyridine-5-carboxamide Hydrobromide dihydrate crystals (Form B21, 1.54 g) were obtained.
[0047]
Example 7-3
(Crystal form conversion; hydrobromide A61 form → B21 form)
4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H- Pyrrolo [2,3-b] pyridine-5-carboxamide hydrobromide (form A61, 1.0 g), EtOH (3.5 mL) and water (1.5 mL) were sequentially charged at room temperature and suspended overnight. After suspension, the crystals were filtered at room temperature and the wet crystals were washed with 70% aqueous EtOH. The wet crystals are dried overnight under vacuum and 4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H-pyrrolo [2,3-b] pyridine-5-carboxamide Hydrobromide dihydrate crystals (Form B21, 827 mg) were obtained.
[0048]
Reference Example 1
( Example of Preparation of Monohydrate Crystalline Compound (I) Free Form)
4-Chloro-1H-pyrrolo [2,3-b] pyridine-5-carboxamide (44.5 g) under nitrogen atmosphere 1s, 3R, 4s, 5S) -4-aminoadamantan-1-ol (57.0 g) and tributylamine (162.6 mL) were charged in NMP (222.5 mL), and heated and stirred at a bath temperature of 200 ° C. for 2.5 hours. The reaction solution was allowed to cool, and then the reaction solution was added dropwise while stirring in water / Et 2 O (6 L / 0.5 L), followed by stirring for 30 minutes. The obtained solid was collected by filtration, washed twice with water (400 mL), washed twice with Et 2 O (300 mL), and dried. The resulting solid was warmed to dissolve in MeOH (1.8 L) and filtered hot. The resulting mother liquor was concentrated under reduced pressure and MeOH (1.8 L) was added to the residue and heated to dissolve. The resulting solution was allowed to cool and stir, and then stirred at room temperature and aged overnight. The precipitated solid was collected by filtration, washed with EtOH and dried under reduced pressure. The resulting solid was suspended in EtOH (250 mL) and stirred at room temperature for 1 h. The solid was collected by filtration, washed with EtOH and dried under reduced pressure. The obtained solid was suspended in water (900 mL) and stirred at a bath temperature of 70 ° C. for 2 hours. The solid was collected by filtration, washed with water and dried under reduced pressure. Furthermore, the solid was suspended in water (900 mL) and stirred at a bath temperature of 70 ° C. for 2 hours. The solid is collected by filtration, washed with water and then dried under reduced pressure to give 4-{[(1R, 2s, 3S, 5s, 7s) -5-hydroxy-2-adamantyl] amino} -1H-pyrrolo [2 , 3-b] Pyridine-5-carboxamide monohydrate crystal (Form A01, 44 g) was obtained.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
REFERENCES
1: D’Amico F, Fiorino G, Furfaro F, Allocca M, Danese S. Janus kinase inhibitors for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases: developments from phase I and phase II clinical trials. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2018 Jul;27(7):595-599. doi: 10.1080/13543784.2018.1492547. Epub 2018 Jul 6. Review. PubMed PMID: 29938545.
2: Sands BE, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Lichtenstein GR, Zhang H, Strauss R, Szapary P, Johanns J, Panes J, Vermeire S, O’Brien CD, Yang Z, Bertelsen K, Marano C; Peficitinib-UC Study Group. Peficitinib, an Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitor, in Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Results From a Randomized, Phase 2 Study. J Crohns Colitis. 2018 Jun 15. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy085. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 29917064.
3: Veale DJ, McGonagle D, McInnes IB, Krueger JG, Ritchlin CT, Elewaut D, Kanik KS, Hendrikx T, Berstein G, Hodge J, Telliez JB. The rationale for Janus kinase inhibitors for the treatment of spondyloarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Apr 3. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key070. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 29618084.
4: Cline A, Cardwell LA, Feldman SR. Advances in treating psoriasis in the elderly with small molecule inhibitors. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2017 Dec;18(18):1965-1973. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2017.1409205. Epub 2017 Nov 27. Review. PubMed PMID: 29171774.
5: Baker KF, Isaacs JD. Novel therapies for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: What can we learn from their use in rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriasis, Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis? Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Feb;77(2):175-187. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211555. Epub 2017 Aug 1. Review. PubMed PMID: 28765121.
6: Zhu T, Howieson C, Wojtkowski T, Garg JP, Han D, Fisniku O, Keirns J. The Effect of Verapamil, a P-Glycoprotein Inhibitor, on the Pharmacokinetics of Peficitinib, an Orally Administered, Once-Daily JAK Inhibitor. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2017 Nov;6(6):548-555. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.344. Epub 2017 Mar 16. PubMed PMID: 28301084.
7: Genovese MC, Greenwald M, Codding C, Zubrzycka-Sienkiewicz A, Kivitz AJ, Wang A, Shay K, Wang X, Garg JP, Cardiel MH. Peficitinib, a JAK Inhibitor, in Combination With Limited Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 May;69(5):932-942. doi: 10.1002/art.40054. PubMed PMID: 28118538.
8: Ito M, Yamazaki S, Yamagami K, Kuno M, Morita Y, Okuma K, Nakamura K, Chida N, Inami M, Inoue T, Shirakami S, Higashi Y. A novel JAK inhibitor, peficitinib, demonstrates potent efficacy in a rat adjuvant-induced arthritis model. J Pharmacol Sci. 2017 Jan;133(1):25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jphs.2016.12.001. Epub 2016 Dec 23. PubMed PMID: 28117214.
9: Zhu T, Parker B, Wojtkowski T, Nishimura T, Garg JP, Han D, Fisniku O, Keirns J. Drug Interactions Between Peficitinib, an Orally Administered, Once-Daily Janus Kinase Inhibitor, and Rosuvastatin in Healthy Subjects. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017 Jul;56(7):747-757. doi: 10.1007/s40262-016-0474-4. PubMed PMID: 27878567.
11: Kivitz AJ, Gutierrez-Ureña SR, Poiley J, Genovese MC, Kristy R, Shay K, Wang X, Garg JP, Zubrzycka-Sienkiewicz A. Peficitinib, a JAK Inhibitor, in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Apr;69(4):709-719. doi: 10.1002/art.39955. PubMed PMID: 27748083.
12: Lam S. JAK inhibitors: A broadening approach in rheumatoid arthritis. Drugs Today (Barc). 2016 Aug;52(8):467-469. PubMed PMID: 27722215.
13: Roskoski R Jr. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in the treatment of inflammatory and neoplastic diseases. Pharmacol Res. 2016 Sep;111:784-803. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.07.038. Epub 2016 Jul 26. Review. PubMed PMID: 27473820.
14: Iwata S, Tanaka Y. Progress in understanding the safety and efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2016 Oct;12(10):1047-57. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2016.1189826. Epub 2016 Jun 6. Review. PubMed PMID: 27253519.
15: Cao YJ, Sawamoto T, Valluri U, Cho K, Lewand M, Swan S, Lasseter K, Matson M, Holman J Jr, Keirns J, Zhu T. Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of ASP015K (Peficitinib), a New Janus Kinase Inhibitor, in Healthy Subjects. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2016 Nov;5(6):435-449. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.273. Epub 2016 Jun 30. PubMed PMID: 27162173.
16: Nielsen OH, Seidelin JB, Ainsworth M, Coskun M. Will novel oral formulations change the management of inflammatory bowel disease? Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2016 Jun;25(6):709-18. doi: 10.1517/13543784.2016.1165204. Epub 2016 Mar 28. Review. PubMed PMID: 26967267.
17: Yiu ZZ, Warren RB. Novel Oral Therapies for Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2016 Jun;17(3):191-200. doi: 10.1007/s40257-016-0179-3. Review. PubMed PMID: 26923915.
18: Takeuchi T, Tanaka Y, Iwasaki M, Ishikura H, Saeki S, Kaneko Y. Efficacy and safety of the oral Janus kinase inhibitor peficitinib (ASP015K) monotherapy in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis in Japan: a 12-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jun;75(6):1057-64. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208279. Epub 2015 Dec 15. PubMed PMID: 26672064; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4893099.
19: Oda K, Cao YJ, Sawamoto T, Nakada N, Fisniku O, Nagasaka Y, Sohda KY. Human mass balance, metabolite profile and identification of metabolic enzymes of [¹⁴C]ASP015K, a novel oral janus kinase inhibitor. Xenobiotica. 2015;45(10):887-902. doi: 10.3109/00498254.2015.1026864. Epub 2015 May 19. PubMed PMID: 25986538.
20: Nakada N, Oda K. Identification and characterization of metabolites of ASP015K, a novel oral Janus kinase inhibitor, in rats, chimeric mice with humanized liver, and humans. Xenobiotica. 2015;45(9):757-65. doi: 10.3109/00498254.2015.1019594. Epub 2015 Jun 12. PubMed PMID: 25869242.
/////////////////Peficitinib hydrobromide, Smyraf, JAPAN 2019, ペフィシチニブ臭化水素酸塩 , ASP015K, Rheumatoid Arthritis
Process for preparing α-carboxamide pyrrolidine derivatives (particularly vixotrigine ) and its intermediates are modulators of use-dependent voltage-gated sodium channels
Biogen, following the acquisition of Convergence Pharmaceuticals, that previously acquired clinical assets from GSK is developing vixotrigine a voltage-gated sodium channel 1.7 inhibitor, for the oral treatment of neuropathic pain, primarily trigeminal neuralgia.
CHEN, Weirong; US
COUMING, Vinny; US
IRDAM, Erwin; US
KIESMAN, William, F.; US
KWOK, Daw-long, A.; US
MACK, Tamera, L.; US
OPALKA, Suzanne, M.; US
PATIENCE, Daniel, B.; US
WALKER, Donald, G.; US
LIANG, Wenli; US
The invention relates to a novel process for preparing a-carboxamide pyrrolidine derivatives, in particular (2S, 5R)-5-(4-((2-fluorobenzyl)oxy)phenyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide, and to novel intermediates for use in said process along with processes for preparing said intermediates.
is described in WO 2007/042239 as having utility in the treatment of diseases and conditions mediated by modulation of use-dependent voltage-gated sodium channels. The synthetic preparation of (2S, 5R)-5-(4-((2-fluorobenzyl)oxy)phenyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide is described in both WO 2007/042239 and WO 2011/029762.
Description 1a: Methyl (S)-5-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)-2-((iert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)-5-oxopentanoate (D1a) (Batch Process using Grignard Procedure)
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
A reactor was charged with THF (350 kg) and the solvent was degassed by nitrogen sparging for about 30 min at 20 – 30 °C. To the degassed THF was charged l-(benzyloxy)- 4- bromobenzene (137 kg (1.78 equiv)). The solids were dissolved at 20 – 30 °C with agitation and under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen.
A reactor was charged with Mg (21.3 kg (3.0 equiv)) and THF (131 kg) and the mixture was degassed by nitrogen sparging for about 30 min at 20 – 30 °C. To this mixture was added -5% of the 1-(benzyloxy)-4-bromobenzene – THF solution followed by heating to 50 – 60 °C under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen. With good agitation, DIBAL-H in toluene (1 M; 2.5 kg (0.01 equiv)) was added followed by heating the mixture to 60 – 70 °C and aging for about 1 h. The remaining amount of the 1-(benzyloxy)-4-bromobenzene – THF solution was added followed by a THF rinse (36 kg) of the reactor. The mixture was aged for about 1 h at 60 – 70 °C and was cooled to 20 – 30 °C under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen.
A reactor was charged with THF (382 kg) and the solvent was degassed by nitrogen sparging for about 30 min at 20 – 30 °C. To the degassed THF was charged l-(ferf-butyl) 2-methyl (S)- 5- oxopyrrolidine 1 ,2-dicarboxylate (71 kg (1.0 equiv)), and the resulting solution was cooled to -60 to -70 °C under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen. To this solution was added the Grignard solution while maintaining a reaction temperature of <-60 °C. The reactor that contained the Grignard solution was rinsed with THF (61 kg) and the reaction was aged at -60 to -70 °C for about 1 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored (HPLC).
Upon completion, 2-propanol (56 kg) was added while maintaining a reaction temperature of -60 to -70 °C, and the reaction was aged for about 30 min. Water (296 kg) was added while maintaining a reaction temperature of <10 °C; the contents of the reactor were warmed to 20 – 30 °C following the addition. The pH of the mixture was adjusted to 6 – 7 by addition of 51 wt% acetic acid in water (70 kg). MTBE (220 kg) was added and the mixture was agitated for about 30 min. The layers were separated, the organic layer was clarified by filtration and was concentrated to about 3 – 4V. MTBE (220 kg) was added and the resulting solution was concentrated to about 3 – 4V. MTBE (150 kg) was added and the resulting solution was heated to 35 – 45 °C. n-Heptane (250 kg) was added slowly while maintaining a reaction temperature of 35 – 45 °C, the mixture was aged for 1 – 2 h, cooled to 0 – 5 °C and aged for 3 – 5 h. The solids were isolated by filtration, washed with n-heptane (74 kg) and dried in vacuo at 50 – 60 °C to constant weight to afford 96.7 kg (77.5%) of the title compound.
oxopentanoate (D1 b) (Batch Process using Grignard Procedure) (Alternative
Procedure)
A reactor was charged with degassed THF (1090 kg) and 1-(benzyloxy)-4-bromobenzene (329 kg (1.46 equiv)). The solids were dissolved at 20 – 25 °C with agitation and under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen.
A reactor was charged with Mg turnings (31.9 kg (1.53 equiv)) and degassed THF (389 kg) under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen. To this mixture was added -5% of the l-(benzyloxy)-4-bromobenzene – THF solution (-70 kg) followed by heating to 50 – 60 °C. With good agitation, DIBAL-H in toluene (1.5M; 4.55 kg (0.0093 equiv)) was added followed by addition of toluene (2.16 kg) into the reactor through the charging line. The mixture was heated to 60
– 70 °C and aged for about 1 h. The remaining amount of the 1-(benzyloxy)-4-bromobenzene
– THF solution was added followed by a degassed THF rinse (51 kg) of the reactor. The mixture was aged for about 1 h at 60 – 70 °C and was cooled to 20 – 30 °C under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen.
A reactor was charged with degassed THF (1090 kg) and 1-(te/f-butyl) 2-methyl (S)-5-oxopyrrolidine 1 ,2-dicarboxylate (208 kg (1.0 equiv)), and the resulting solution was cooled to -60 to -70 °C under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen. To this solution was added the Grignard solution while maintaining a reaction temperature of <-50 °C. The reactor that contained the Grignard solution was rinsed with degassed THF (208 kg) and the reaction was aged at -60 to -70 °C for about 1 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored (HPLC).
Upon completion, 2-propanol (164 kg) was added while maintaining a reaction temperature of <-40 °C, and the reaction was aged for 20 – 30 min. Water (100 kg) was added while maintaining a reaction temperature of <-20 °C; the contents of the reactor were warmed to -10 to -20 °C following the addition. The mixture was transferred into another reactor and water (940 kg) was added while maintaining a reaction temperature of <10 °C; the contents of the reactor were warmed to 20 – 30 °C following the addition. The pH of the mixture was adjusted to 6.0 – 7.0 by addition of 50 wt% acetic acid in water (-170 kg). MTBE (647 kg) was added and the mixture was agitated for 20 – 30 min. The layers were separated, and the organic layer was stirred for 20 – 30 min with a brine solution prepared from NaCI (48 kg) and water (390 kg). The layers were separated, the organic layer was clarified by filtration and the filtration apparatus was washed with THF (30 kg). The solution was concentrated to about 5.5 – 6X the input mass of 1-(te/f-butyl) 2-methyl (S)-5-oxopyrrolidine 1 ,2-dicarboxylate at a temperature of 45 – 50 °C. MTBE (647 kg) was added and the resulting solution was concentrated to about 5.5 – 6X the input mass of 1-(te/f-butyl) 2-methyl (S)-5-oxopyrrolidine 1 ,2-dicarboxylate at a temperature of 45 – 50 °C. MTBE (661 kg) was added and the resulting solution was concentrated to about 5.5 – 6X the input mass of 1 -(te/f-butyl) 2-methyl (S)-5-oxopyrrolidine 1 ,2-dicarboxylate at a temperature of 45 – 50 °C. MTBE (77 kg) was added, the solution was sampled and analysed for residual THF content (if the result was >15%, MTBE (661 kg) was added and the solution was concentrated at 45 – 50 °C to about 5.5 – 6X the input mass of 1-(te/f-butyl) 2-methyl (S)-5-oxopyrrolidine 1 ,2-dicarboxylate). The solution was cooled to 35 – 45 °C and n-Heptane (726 kg) was added slowly while maintaining a reaction temperature of 35 – 45 °C. The mixture was aged for 1 – 2 h, cooled to 15 – 25 °C over 2 – 3 h, cooled to 0 – 5 °C and aged for 3 – 5 h. The solids were isolated by centrifugation and washed with n-heptane (214 kg). The wet solids (-328 kg) were dissolved in THF (683 kg) at 40 – 50 °C. The solution was cooled to 35 – 45 °C and n-heptane (564 kg) was added slowly while maintaining a reaction temperature of 35 – 45 °C. The mixture was aged for 1 -2 h, cooled to 15 – 25 °C over 2 – 3 h, cooled to 0 – 5 °C and aged for 3 – 5 h. The solids were isolated by centrifugation, washed with n-heptane (167 kg) and dried in vacuo at 50 – 60 °C to constant weight to afford 252 kg (69%) of the title compound.
Description 1c: Methyl (S)-5-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)-2-((fert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)-5-oxopentanoate (D1c) (Batch Process using Magnesium “ate” Procedure)
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
A reactor was charged with THF (249 kg) and the solvent was degassed by nitrogen sparging for about 30 min at 20 – 30 °C. To the degassed THF was charged l-(ferf-butyl) 2-methyl (S)-5-oxopyrrolidine 1 ,2-dicarboxylate (71 kg (1.0 equiv)), and the resulting solution was stirred at 20 to 30 °C under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen.
A reactor was charged with THF (460 kg) and the mixture was degassed by nitrogen sparging for about 30 min at 20 – 30 °C. To the degassed THF was charged 1-(benzyloxy)-4-bromobenzene (93 kg (1.2 equiv)) and the solution was degassed in triplicate. The solution was cooled to -40 to -50 °C under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen. To this solution was added /‘-PrMgCI – THF solution (51.3 kg, 2M; 0.36 equiv) while maintaining a reaction temperature of <-40 °C. To this solution was added n-BuLi – hexane solution (71.3 kg, 2.5M; 0.90 equiv) while maintaining a reaction temperature of <-40 °C. The contents of the reactor were aged at -40 to -50 °C for 1 – 1.5 h. The solution was cooled to -60 to -70 °C under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen.
The 1-(te/f-butyl) 2-methyl (S)-5-oxopyrrolidine 1 ,2-dicarboxylate – THF solution was added to the reactor containing the organomagnesium “ate” solution while maintaining a reaction temperature of -60 to -70 °C; the contents of the reactor were aged for about 1 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored (HPLC).
Upon completion, 10% NH4CI solution (389 kg) was added while maintaining a reaction temperature of < -40 °C. Following the addition, the contents of the reactor were warmed to 20 – 30 °C. The pH of the mixture was adjusted to 6 – 7 by addition of 50 wt% acetic acid in water (24.4 kg). n-Heptane (97 kg) was added and the mixture was agitated for 20 – 30 min at 20 – 30 °C. The layers were separated and the organic layer was concentrated in vacuo to about 270 L at <50 °C. The contents of the reactor were cooled to 20 – 30 °C and n-heptane (490 kg) was added followed by slurry aging for 2 – 3 h. The slurry was cooled to 0 – 5 °C and aged for 2 – 3 h. The solids were isolated by filtration, washed with a solution composed of n-heptane (58 kg) and THF (25 kg) and were dried in vacuo at 50 – 60 °C to constant weight to afford 102.95 kg (82.5%) of the title compound.
A reactor was charged with the title compound (102.95 kg) and THF (469 kg). The contents of the reactor were warmed to 40 – 50 °C, aged for 1 – 2 h, cooled to 20 – 30 °C and concentrated to a volume of about 250 L. n-Heptane (490 kg) was added and the mixture was agitated for 2 – 3 h at 20 – 30 °C. The mixture was cooled to 0 – 5 °C and aged for 2 – 3 h. The solids were isolated by filtration, washed with n-heptane (213 kg) and dried in vacuo at 50 – 60 °C to constant weight to afford 87.95 kg (70.5%) of the title compound.
Description 1d: Methyl (S)-5-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)-2-((fert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)-5-oxopentanoate (Did) (Batch Process using Turbo Grignard Procedure)
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
A clean 100 mL EasyMax reactor was swept with dry nitrogen, the flow was reduced and /‘-PrMgCI-LiCI complex in THF (41.7g, 1.3M, 1.0 eq) was added to the reactor and the temperature was set to 20 °C. Bis(dimethylamino)ethyl ether (9.13 g, 1.0 eq) was added in a single portion, the mixture was stirred for 5 min, and 4-benzyloxybromobenzene (15.0 g, 1.0 eq) was added in a single portion. The reaction was heated to 40°C under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen and held at this temperature until full conversion was observed (ca. 3.5h).
A clean 100 mL EasyMax reactor was swept with dry nitrogen, the flow was reduced and dry THF (45 mL). 1-(te/f-butyl) 2-methyl (S)-5-oxopyrrolidine 1 ,2-dicarboxylate (5.0 g, 1.0 eq) was charged in a single portion and the solution was cooled to -35 °C under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen. The Grignard solution (26.4 mL, 0.85M, 1.1 eq) was then added at a rate of 0.5 mL/min while maintaining a reaction temperature of <-30°C. The progress of the reaction was monitored (HPLC). Upon completion the reaction was neutralized by the addition of a 14.6 wt% AcOH/water solution (24 mL). The reaction was then warmed to -10 °C, then to 0 °C. A 20% aqueous NH4CI solution (10.3 g) was added followed by a pH adjustment with 1 M HCI (14 mL), then with 6M HCI to an endpoint of pH 1. The reaction mixture was transferred to a separatory funnel with the aid of 25 ml of THF. The phases were separated and the organic layer washed with saturated aqueous NaCI solution (16 g). The organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure at <50°C to afford a crude product solution (19.4 g).
The crude product solution was transferred to a clean 100 mL EasyMax reactor and was heated to 35 °C. Heptane (20 mL) was then added over about 30 sec. The mixture was cooled to 10°C and held for about 30 min. The solids were filtered, washed twice with 2: 1 heptane/MTBE mixture (14 mL) and dried to constant weight to afford 4.147 g (47%) of the title compound.
Description 1e: Methyl (S)-5-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)-2-((fert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)-5-oxopentanoate (Die) (Flow Process using Intermittent Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor)
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Reactor 1 was charged with 1-(benzyloxy)-4-bromobenzene (145 g (1.0 eq)) and the reactor was flushed with nitrogen. THF (490 g) was added and solids were dissolved at 20 – 30 °C by agitation; the solution was kept under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen.
Reactor 2 was charged with Mg (13.66 g (1.02 eq relative to reactor 1 charge)) and the reactor was flushed with nitrogen. Iodine (0.14 g (0.001 eq relative to the 1-(benzyloxy)-4-bromobenzene charge)) was charged followed by addition of 5% of the prepared 1-(benzyloxy)-4-bromobenzene – THF solution. The contents of the reactor were warmed to 50 – 65 °C and after color dissipation, the remainder of the prepared 1-(benzyloxy)-4-bromobenzene – THF solution (Reactor 1) was added while maintaining a reaction temperature of 50 – 70 °C. The contents of the reactor were stirred at 60 – 70 °C for about 1 h, cooled to 20 – 30 °C and held under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen.
Grignard Solution Batch 1
Reactor 3 was charged with 1-(benzyloxy)-4-bromobenzene (2.755 kg (1.0 eq)) and the reactor was flushed with nitrogen. THF (9.29 kg) was added and solids were dissolved at 20 – 30 °C by gentle agitation; the solution was kept under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen. Reactor 4 was charged with Mg (259.2 g (1.02 eq relative to the reactor 3 charge)) and the reactor was flushed with nitrogen. The contents of Reactor 2 were charged and the mixture was warmed to 50 – 65 °C. The prepared 1-(benzyloxy)-4-bromobenzene – THF solution in Reactor 3 was added while maintaining a reaction temperature of 50 – 70 °C. The contents of the reactor were stirred at 60 – 70 °C for about 1 h and cooled to 20 – 30 °C. About 95% of this Grignard solution was transferred into Reactor 5 and held under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen. A sample was pulled from Reactor 5 for analysis (residual 1-(benzyloxy)-4-bromobenzene (HPLC); Grignard reagent concentration). The remaining 5% of this Grignard solution was held in Reactor 4 under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen.
Grignard Solution Batch 2
Reactor 3 was charged with 1-(benzyloxy)-4-bromobenzene (2.90 kg (1.0 eq)) and the reactor was flushed with nitrogen. THF (9.78 kg) was added and solids were dissolved at 20 – 30 °C by gentle agitation; the solution was kept under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen.
Reactor 4 was charged with Mg (273.1 g (1.02 eq relative to the reactor 3 charge)) and the mixture was warmed to 50 – 65 °C. The prepared 1-(benzyloxy)-4-bromobenzene – THF solution in Reactor 3 was added while maintaining a reaction temperature of 50 – 70 °C. The contents of the reactor were stirred at 60 – 70 °C for about 1 h and cooled to 20 – 30 °C. About 95% of this Grignard solution was transferred into Reactor 6 and held under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen. A sample was pulled from Reactor 6 for analysis (residual 1-(benzyloxy)-4-bromobenzene (HPLC); Grignard reagent concentration). The remaining 5% of this Grignard solution was held in Reactor 4 under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen.
Grignard Solution Batch 3
Reactor 3 was charged with 1-(benzyloxy)-4-bromobenzene (2.90 kg (1.0 eq)) and the reactor was flushed with nitrogen. THF (9.78 kg) was added and solids were dissolved at 20 – 30 °C by gentle agitation; the solution was kept under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen.
Reactor 4 was charged with Mg (273.2 g (1.02 eq relative to the reactor 3 charge)) and the mixture was warmed to 50 – 65 °C. The prepared 1-(benzyloxy)-4-bromobenzene – THF solution in Reactor 3 was added while maintaining a reaction temperature of 50 – 70 °C. The contents of the reactor were stirred at 60 – 70 °C for about 1 h, cooled to 20 – 30 °C and held under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen. A sample was pulled for analysis (residual 1-(benzyloxy)-4-bromobenzene (HPLC); Grignard reagent concentration).
Reaction of Grignard Reagent with l-(ferf-butyl) 2-methyl (S)-5-oxopyrrolidine 1 ,2-dicarboxylate
The reaction was performed in 12 cycles; a representative cycle is described below. In total, 6.46 kg of 1-(te/f-butyl) 2-methyl (S)-5-oxopyrrolidine 1 ,2-dicarboxylate was processed forward to the title compound.
Reactor 7 was charged with 1-(te/f-butyl) 2-methyl (S)-5-oxopyrrolidine 1 ,2-dicarboxylate (2.21 kg) and THF (5.89 kg) and the solids were dissolved at 20 – 30 °C by gentle agitation under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen.
Reactor 8 was charged with THF (0.98 kg) and the solvent was cooled to about -10 °C under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen. Solutions of the Grignard reagent (3.2 kg) in Reactor 6 and the 1-(te/f-butyl) 2-methyl (S)-5-oxopyrrolidine 1 ,2-dicarboxylate – THF solution (2.0 kg) in Reactor 7 were simultaneously pumped into Reactor 8 over 15 min while maintaining a reaction temperature of <30 °C. The contents of Reactor 8 were stirred for an additional 15 min; the final reaction temperature was 0 – 10 °C. The contents of Reactor 8 were transferred to Reactor 9, cooled to about -5 °C and the reaction was quenched by addition of 1 M aqueous H2SO4 solution (1.20 equiv) while maintaining a reaction temperature of <10 °C. The mixture was stirred for 30 min, was transferred to Reactor 10 and was heated to 25 – 30 °C. The mixture was transferred to Reactor 1 1 , toluene (2.39 kg) was charged and the mixture was agitated. The mixture was transferred to Settler 1 and the organic layer was transferred to Reactor 12 using a metering pump. Water (1.65 kg) wash charged to Reactor 12, the mixture was agitated, transferred to Settler 2 and the organic layer was transferred to a storage container using a metering pump.
Product Isolation
The contents of the storage container (organic streams from 12 reaction cycles) was concentrated in Reactor 13 to an endpoint of 65 °C (pot temperature) at 200 torr. The contents of the reactor were cooled to 30 °C, then to 0 to -10 °C and aged for 0.5 – 2 h. The solids were isolated by filtration, washed with toluene (7.50 kg) and dried in vacuo at 50 °C and < 10 torr to give 8.76 kg (77%) of the title compound.
Description 1f: Methyl (S)-5-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)-2-((fert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)-5-oxopentanoate (D1f) (Flow Process using Plug Flow Reactor)
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
A flow reactor with two reagent inputs, ¾ inch tubing for reagent transfer, and two ½ inch jacketed static mixers connected in series (35 mL volume) was assembled. Gear pumps were used to transfer reagents to the flow reactor. Mass flow meters were used to measure the flow rates of the reagents. Thermocouples were placed to monitor the temperature of the (4-benzyloxy)phenylmagnesium bromide (Grignard) and l-(terf-butyl) 2-methyl (S)-5-oxopyrrolidine 1 ,2-dicarboxylate solutions prior to entering the tube-in-tube mixer T, as well as the out-flowing reaction stream from the static mixers. A fourth thermocouple measured the
temperature of the collection vessel. A peristaltic pump was used to transfer an aqueous acetic acid quench solution to the reaction stream as it exited from the static mixers. A standard T-mixer was used to join these reaction streams. The quenched reaction mixture flowed through a cooled coil into a jacketed collecting vessel. The approximate residence time through the static mixers was calculated to be -4.5 seconds.
Solution B: 0.44M l-(ferf-butyl) 2-methyl (S)-5-oxopyrrolidine 1 ,2-dicarboxylate (0.750 kg) in THF (6.5 L)
Solution C: 2.9M glacial acetic acid (517 g) in water (3.013 L) to provide a 2.9 M solution. The quenched reaction mixture flowed into a collecting vessel containing 20% aqueous NH4CI (1.465 kg) at 0 °C.
The pre-cooling loop for Solution B was set to a bath temperature of -20 to -22 °C. The static mixer jacket coolant was set to a temperature of -25 °C. The pre-cooling loop for Solution A was set to a jacket temperature of -5 °C. The continuous quench tube reactor was set to a bath temperature of 0 °C.
After the jacket temperatures and cooling baths were allowed to reach desired temperatures, Solution A was pumped at a rate of -250 mL/min through the outside tube of the tube-in-tube mixer and met the Solution B that was pumped through the inner tube at a rate of 250 mL/min. Simultaneously to the reagent streams, the flow rate of the 2.9M aqueous acetic acid solution was initiated and set to approximately 130 mL/min. Reagent flow rates were measured with mass flow meters and temperatures were measured with thermocouples.
The reaction was run for about 20 min; a total of 5.663 kg of Solution B, 6.237 kg of Solution A and 3.530 kg of 2.9M aqueous acetic acid solution were charged during the reaction. The lines were rinsed with THF (1.252 kg) immediately after the reaction was finished.
The pH of the aqueous layer in the collection vessel was measured at 6.08. The pH was adjusted to 5.05 with 1 N HCI (2.05 kg) followed by the addition of 1V: 1V AcOH/water (162 g). The reactor jacket temperature was set to 10 °C and the contents of the reactor were stirred for 12 h. The pH of the mixture was further adjusted to 2.06 by adding 37% HCI (0.301 kg) and the mixture was stirred at 0 – 10 °C for 15 to 30 min.
The aqueous layer was separated and the organic layer was stirred for 20 min with a 25% brine solution (1.995 kg). The aqueous layer was separated; the organic layer was held at 10 °C overnight. The organic layer was concentrated at 35 – 40 °C (jacket temperature) and 25-30 mm Hg. Upon reaching a volume of about 9.5 L, a well developed slurry was noted. The concentration was continued to a volume of about 4.5 L. The slurry was warmed to 31 °C and heptane (3.145 kg) was added. The slurry was heated to 35 °C, stirred for 30 min, and was cooled to and held at 20 to 22 °C. The slurry was cooled to 10 °C and stirred for at least 2 h. Solids were collected by filtration and washed with 2: 1 heptane/MTBE (2 x 1.5 L). The solids were dried to constant weight in vacuo to yield 990 g (86.8%) of the title compound.
A reactor was charged with degassed THF (1 199 kg) and 1-(benzyloxy)-4-bromobenzene (450 kg). The solids were dissolved at 20 – 25 °C with agitation and under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen. The mixture was heated to reflux for 15 min, then cooled to 20 – 30 °C.
A reactor was charged with Mg turnings (43.6 kg) and degassed THF (399 kg) under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen. To this mixture, a solution of DIBAL-H (25% in toluene, 6.2 kg) was added followed by addition of toluene (3.7 L) into the reactor through the charging line. The mixture was heated to reflux for 10 – 15 minutes followed by charging of 5% of the 1-(benzyloxy)-4-bromobenzene – THF solution. The contents of the reactor were held for 1 h under reflux; reaction initiation was confirmed. The remainder of the 1-(benzyloxy)-4-bromobenzene – THF solution was added over 3 – 4 h. Following the charge, the temperature was adjusted to 20 – 30 °C.
A reactor was charged with degassed THF (760 kg) and 1-(te/f-butyl) 2-methyl (S)-5-oxopyrrolidine 1 ,2-dicarboxylate (284.9 kg), and the resulting solution was heated to reflux under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen, maintained at reflux for 10 – 15 min, then cooled to -60 °C to -70 °C. To this solution was added the Grignard solution while maintaining a reaction temperature of <-50 °C. The reactor which contained the 1-(benzyloxy)-4-bromobenzene -THF solution was rinsed with degassed THF (22 kg) and the rinse was charged into the reaction. The contents of the reactor were aged at -60 to -70 °C for about 1 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored for completion (HPLC).
A reactor was charged with 2-propanol (285 L) and THF (253 kg). With good agitation the reaction was quenched into this THF – 2-propanol solution while keeping the temperature between -20 °C and 0 °C. The reactor was rinsed forward with THF (53 kg), and the mixture was stirred vigorously for 5 – 10 min. Water (712 L) was added while maintaining a reaction temperature of <20 °C; the pH of the mixture was adjusted to 6.0 – 7.0 by addition of 50 wt% acetic acid in water (-170 kg) while controlling the temperature below 20 °C. The reaction mixture was warmed to 20 – 30 °C, stirred for 20 – 30 min and the phases were separated. Sodium chloride (42 kg) and water (255 L) were charged, the mixture was stirred for 55 – 65 min, and the phases were separated. THF (125 kg) was charged and the solution was concentrated by distillation under vacuum at a temperature of 40 – 45 °C. The distillation was stopped when the weight of the reaction mixture was between 5.5 – 6. OX the weight of the input mass of 1-(te/f-butyl) 2-methyl (S)-5-oxopyrrolidine 1 ,2-dicarboxylate. The reaction mixture was heated to 35 – 45 °C. Heptane (994 kg) was charged to the reaction mixture, the contents of the reactor were maintained at 35 – 45 °C, aged for 1 – 2 h, cooled to 15 – 25 °C over 2 – 3 h, cooled to 0 – 5 °C and aged for 3 – 5 h. The solids were isolated by centrifugation in three portions; each portion was washed with heptane (97 kg) followed by acetonitrile (59 kg) to give 389 kg of wet product. Based on LOD measurements, 375.3 kg (76.6 %) of the title compound was obtained.
A reactor was charged with 1-benzyl 2-methyl (S)-5-oxopyrrolidine 1 ,2-dicarboxylate (69.3 g) and anhydrous THF (450 g) and the resulting solution was cooled to about -65 °C under an
inert atmosphere of nitrogen. A solution of 0.8M (4-benzyloxy)phenylmagnesium bromide in THF (1.1 eq) was added over about 2 h, and the progress of the reaction was monitored by HPLC. Upon completion, the reaction was quenched by simultaneous addition of 1 M sulfuric acid (1.1 eq) and toluene (264 g) over about 30 min. The resulting mixture was warmed from -10 °C to ambient temperature and was aged for about 30 min. The phases were separated, and the organic layer was washed with 10 wt% brine (180 g) and water (180 g). The organic solution was concentrated to about 6V at about 50 °C and <170 mbar (distillate: 650 g / 710 ml_). The resulting solution was heated to about 65 °C and a solution of toluene (105 g) and methylcyclohexane (200 g) was added dropwise while maintaining a temperature of about 65 °C. The solution was cooled to 0 – 5 °C and aged for about 1 h. The solids were isolated by filtration, washed with cold (0 – 5 °C) methylcyclohexane (200 g in 6 portions) and dried at 45 °C in vacuo to constant weight to give 76.6 g (66%) of the title compound.
Equipment: plug flow reactor with a Y-mixer; 10 ml_ reaction loop
Reaction conditions:
· reagent flow rates:
o solution A: 5.27 ml_ / min (1.3 eq)
o solution B: 4.72 ml_ / min (1.0 eq)
o solution C: 5.75 ml_ / min (1.5 eq)
• residence time: 1 min
· reaction temperature: 25 °C
• collection time: 2 h (theory: 0.36 mol title product)
• the quenched reaction mixture flowed into a collecting vessel
Following collection of the quenched reaction mixture, the phases were separated and the upper organic layer was concentrated to dryness in vacuo. The solids were dissolved in fresh THF (5.5V) at 45 °C. The solution was cooled to -5 °C over about 160 min and was aged overnight. The solids were collected by filtration, washed with heptane (5.5V, total) and dried to constant weight at 55 °C in vacuo to afford 18.61 g (45%) of the title product.
The combined filtrate and wash containing additional solids was transferred to a reactor, cooled to -5 °C over 2 h and aged for an additional 4 h. The solids were collected by filtration, washed with heptane (2 X 2V) and dried to constant weight at 55 °C in vacuo to afford 1 1.37 g (27%) of the title product.
The CSTR flow setup consists of one 1 L stirred tank for reaction, one 1 L settling tank and one 10L Schlenk type collection vessel. The stirred tank was equipped with a solid addition device, a reflux condenser, and a dip-tube (set to a 500 ml_ working volume) with an inner transfer line.
Step 1 : A stirred tank reactor was pre-charged with THF (70 ml), and magnesium (50.8 g, 5 eq), and stirred at room temperature overnight. The solid addition device was filled with magnesium. The reaction was initiated by adding (4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)magnesium bromide 0.77M solution (7.7 g, 5.9 mmol). The jacket temperature was increased to 55 °C. A solution of 1-bromo-4-benzylphenol (0.85 M in THF) was added at a rate of 7.8 ml/min to the stirred reaction vessel. After seven minutes, solid addition of magnesium started at a rate of 0.161 g/min. The total amount of magnesium for the entire run was (175 g, 7.18 mol,
1 equiv) and was calculated to keep 5 eq of magnesium in the stirred tank reactor over the course of the run. When the liquid level in the tank reached the level of the dip tube, a pump activated pulling material to the settling tank at a rate to maintain the 500 mL filling level in the CSTR. The approximate residence time of the solution in the jacketed reactor was 62 minutes. The product was transferred into the settling tank (unstirred), held for another residence time (1 hour), and subsequently transferred to a final collection vessel. The entire process was run for 18 hours.
Step 2: Grignard Addition: The equipment consists of tubular pipe reactor, heat exchanger, and a series of centrifugal phase separators. The tubular reactor accommodates mixing of two reagents for the conversion to methyl (S)-5-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)-2-((tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)-5-oxopentanoate and quenching of the product solution with an acid solution. The centrifugal phase separators separate the product containing organic phase from the waste aqueous phase. The reagent (methyl-N-boc-pyroglutamate, Grignard, and sulfuric acid solutions were transferred continuously at controlled flowrates from their respective storage tank to pass through the tubular pipe reactor, heat exchanger and finally to the centrifugal extractors.
Reaction/Quench/Work-up: The 0.82 M Grignard solution was fed continuously from the storage tank at a flow rate of 32.6 mL/min (1.19 eq), simultaneously a 0.817 M methyl N-boc-pyroglutamate solution stream was fed continuously at 27.4 ml/min through a heat exchanger to pre-cool it to -8°C. The tubular reactor where the reaction between the reagent N-boc-pyroglutamate and Grignard solution occurred was attached to a heat exchange unit with chiller fluid set at 10°C. After passing through the reaction zone, 1.0 M sulfuric acid was introduced at a rate 22.4 ml/min. The residence time of the solution from reagent introduction to acid quench was 8 seconds. From sulfuric acid introduction to phase split the residence time was ca. 80 seconds. The quenched mixture passed through another heat exchanger to increase the temperature to 30°C for phase split. This material was directly fed into a centrifugal extractor to remove the aqueous component. The obtained organic layer was subsequently mixed with a solution of brine and sodium bicarbonate (14.5 ml/min) in a second centrifugal extractor. The final product containing organic layer was collected into a glass bottle. The process was run for 3.7 hours.
Crystallization: The product-containing organic layer above was transferred to a 10 L reactor for solvent switch to a lower water content THF-Heptane solvent system by vacuum distillation. A total of 6867 mL THF (appx. 9.5% v/v) in Heptane was added to the reactor and
subsequently distilled in appx. 2 equal portions maintaining distillation under reduced pressure (appx. 600-700 mbar) at temperature within 60-65°C to replace the original solvent (water-containing THF).3 The final solution obtained (appx. 11.5L) was cooled to 0-5°C with a cooling rate 0.5C/min and the resulting slurry was filtered, washed with Heptane and dried under vacuum at 60°C to obtain 1.765 kg of product.
A reactor was charged with methyl (S)-5-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)-2-((te/f-butoxycarbonyl)amino)-5-oxopentanoate (180 kg) and ACN (486 kg) and the slurry temperature was adjusted to 10 – 15 °C. A solution of methanesulfonic acid (117.5 kg (2.9 eq)) in ACN (75 kg) was added while maintaining a reaction temperature of <25 °C. The reaction temperature was adjusted to 22 – 26 °C and the contents of the reactor were stirred for 1 – 1.5 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored (HPLC). Upon completion, the contents of the reactor were cooled to 10 – 15 °C and a solution of 4. ON NH4OH (299 kg) was added to a pH of 7 – 8 while maintaining a reaction temperature of <25 °C. The phases were separated and the upper organic layer was heated to 30 – 40 °C. While maintaining a reaction temperature of 30 – 40 °C, 2-propanol (101 kg) and water (430 kg) were added to the reactor. The solution was cooled to 17 – 19 °C and was seeded (1.8 kg). The slurry was stirred for 1 – 2 h at 14 – 19 °C, cooled to 7 – 12 °C, aged for 1 – 2 h and cooled to 2 – 7 °C. Water (890 kg) was added and the slurry was aged for 2 – 3 h at 2 – 7 °C. The solids were isolated by filtration, washed with a solution composed of 2-propanol (61 kg) and water (270 kg) and dried in vacuo at 50 – 60 °C to constant weight to afford 1 19.6 kg (90%) of the title compound.
A reactor was charged with methyl (S)-5-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)-2-((tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)-5-oxopentanoate (532 kg) and ACN (1670 kg) and the slurry temperature was adjusted to 20 – 25 °C. Methanesulfonic acid (346 kg (2.9 eq)) was added while maintaining a reaction temperature of <26 °C. The contents of the reactor were stirred for 1 h; the progress of the reaction was monitored (HPLC). Upon completion, the contents of the reactor were cooled to <10 °C and a solution of 4.6N NH40H (773 kg) was added until a pH of 7 – 8 was reached while maintaining a reaction temperature of <25 °C. The phases were separated and the upper organic layer was heated to 30 – 35 °C. The organic layer was filtered through a plate filter to remove small particulates. While maintaining a reaction temperature of 30 – 35 °C, 2-propanol (301 kg) and water (1277 kg) were added to the reactor. The solution was cooled to 18 – 22 °C and precipitation occurred. The slurry was stirred for at least 30 minutes at 18 – 22 °C and then cooled to 0 – 10 °C. While maintaining a temperature of 0 – 10 °C, water (2128 kg) was added and the reaction mixture was aged for not less than 2 hours at 0 – 10 °C. The solids were isolated by filtration, washed with a solution composed of 2-propanol (188 kg) and water (798 kg) and dried in vacuo at 50 – 55 °C to constant weight to afford 319 kg (83%) of the title compound.
Description 2c: methyl (S)-5-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate – flow chemistry procedure with MsOH/ACN
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Solution A: 0.79M methanesulfonic acid in anhydrous ACN
Solution B: 0.25M l-(terf-butyl) (S)-5-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)-2-((tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)-5-oxopentanoate solution in anhydrous THF
Solution C: 4.6N NH4OH solution in water
Equipment: plug flow reactor with a Y-mixer; 10 ml_ stainless steel reaction loop
Reaction equivalents:
· solution A: 3.0 (3.764 mL / min)
• solution B: 1.0 (3.946 mL / min)
• solution C: 2.7 (0.579 mL / min)
Residence time: 1.3 min
Reaction temperature: 130 °C
After reaching steady state, the reaction stream was collected for 102 min in a 1 L flask immersed in an ice water bath. The base solution from pump C and the reaction stream
were simultaneously collected with good stirring. Following the run, the pH was adjusted to 7 with by charging additional 4.6N ammonium hydroxide solution (about 15 mL). The phases were split, and the organic layer was concentrated to dryness by rotary evaporation in vacuo. The resulting residue was dissolved in ACN (120 mL) and distilled water (5 mL) at 25 °C and 500 rpm in a 100 mL EZMax reactor. The solution was cooled to 22 °C and water – I PA solution (2/1 (v/v), 80 mL) was added over about 30 min. The solution was further cooled to 18 °C, seeded (5 wt%) and cooled to about 0 °C over 2 h. Water (139 mL) was added to the slurry over about 30 min, and the mixture was aged for about 20 min. The temperature of the slurry was raised to 20 °C, held for about 40 min, re-cooled to about 0 °C over 90 min and aged for an additional 90 min. The solids were collected by filtration and dried to constant weight in vacuo at 55 °C to give 28.9 g (92%, corrected for seed) of the title compound.
Description 2d: methyl (S)-5-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate – flow chemistry procedure with H2SO4/ACN
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Three solutions were prepared for the flow reaction. Solution A: 0.25M l-(terf-butyl) (S)-5-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)-2-((tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)-5-oxopentanoate solution in anhydrous THF; Solution B: 0.75M sulfuric acid in anhydrous ACN;
A plug flow reactor with a Y-mixer and a 10 mL reaction loop was used with 1 reaction equivalent of solution A, and 2 reaction equivalents of solution B; a residence time of 7.5 minutes; a reaction temperature of 95 °C; and a collection time: 73.7 minutes (theory: 22.1 mmol title product).
The collected product stream was neutralized to pH 7 – 8 using 4.6N NH4OH solution in water. HPLC analysis of the organic layer showed it contained 98.0 area% of the desired product. The lower organic layer was removed, and the organic layer was cooled to about 22 °C, aged for about 30 min and cooled to 0 – 5 °C over about 1 h. Water (38 mL) was added over 10 min, and the resulting slurry was filtered, and was washed with a solution composed of IPA (0.45V) and water (1.5V). The solids were dried in vacuo at 55 °C to yield 2.62 g (38%) of the title compound.
Description 2e: methyl (S)-5-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate – flow chemistry procedure with MsOH/THF-PhMe
Equipment: plug flow reactor with a Y-mixer; 10 ml_ PFA coil reactor
Reaction equivalents:
• solution A: 3.0 (1.667 mL / min)
· solution B: 1.0 (3.333 mL / min)
• solution C: 6.0 (1.087 mL / min)
Residence time: 2.0 min
Reaction temperature: 150 °C
After reaching steady state, the reaction stream was collected for 1 17 min in a 1 L flask immersed in an ice water bath. The base solution from pump C and the reaction stream were simultaneously collected with good stirring for the first 60 min; for the remainder of the collection time, only the reaction stream was collected. Following the run, the pH was adjusted to 7 with by charging additional 4.6N ammonium hydroxide solution. The phases were split, and the organic layer was concentrated to dryness by rotary evaporation in vacuo. The resulting residue was transferred to a 400 mL EZMax reactor using ACN (120 mL) and the temperature of the mixture was raised to 35 °C. To the mixture was added water – IPA solution (2/1 (v/v), 78 mL) over about 10 min. The resulting solution was cooled to 18 °C over about 30 min, seeded (208 mg), further cooled to about 0 °C over 2 h and aged overnight. Water (135 mL) was added to the slurry over about 1 h, and the mixture was aged for about 4 h. The temperature of the slurry was raised to 13 °C, re-cooled to about 0 °C over 3 h and aged overnight. The solids were collected by filtration and dried to constant weight in vacuo at 55 °C to give 8.18 g (27%, corrected for seed) of the title compound.
Description 2f: methyl (S)-5-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate – method A
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
A reactor was charged with methyl (S)-5-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)-2-((te/f-butoxycarbonyl)amino)-5-oxopentanoate (100.0 g) and ACN (400 ml_) and the reaction temperature was adjusted to about 25 °C. Concentrated sulfuric acid (45.3 g) was added over about 10 min while maintaining a reaction temperature of <50 °C. The contents of the reactor were stirred at 40 – 50 °C; the progress of the reaction was monitored for completion (HPLC). Upon completion, the reaction was cooled to about 25 °C. A solution of 4.6N NH4OH (215 ml_) was added with good stirring to a pH of about 7. The phases were separated, and the organic layer was split into two equal portions of about 256 ml_ for product isolation studies.
Portion A
To one portion was added a solution composed of 2-propanol (36.5 ml_) and water (120 ml_) with good stirring at about 22 °C. The resulting slurry was aged briefly at 22 °C, then cooled to 5 °C over about 1 h. Water (100 ml_) was added to the slurry while maintaining a reaction temperature of <10 °C. The solids were filtered, washed with a solution composed of 2-propanol (27.5 ml_) and water (75 ml_) and dried to constant weight in vacuo to give 30.87 g (85%) of the title compound.
Portion B
To one portion was added water (150 ml_) with good stirring at about 22 °C. The resulting slurry was aged briefly at 22 °C, then cooled to 5 °C over about 1 h. Water (100 ml_) was added to the slurry while maintaining a reaction temperature of <10 °C. The solids were filtered, washed with a solution composed of 2-propanol (27.5 ml_) and water (75 ml_) and dried to constant weight in vacuo to give 31.90 g (88%) of the title compound.
Description 2g: methyl (S)-5-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate – method B
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
A reactor was charged with methyl (S)-5-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)-2-((te/f-butoxycarbonyl)amino)-5-oxopentanoate (776.5 kg) and ACN (1743.5 kg) and the slurry temperature was adjusted to 15 – 25 °C. Methanesulfonic acid (482.1 kg) was added while maintaining a reaction temperature of <26 °C. The contents of the reactor were stirred at 20 – 25 °C for about 1 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored (HPLC); while awaiting results, the contents of the reactor were cooled to 0 – 10 °C. A solution of 4.6N NH4OH (590 kg) was added over about 25 min to a pH of 2 – 3 while maintaining a reaction temperature of <30 °C. Additional 4.6N NH4OH solution (519 kg) was added to a final pH of 7 – 8 while maintaining a reaction temperature of <25 °C. The phases were separated and the upper organic layer was heated to 25 – 30 °C. The organic layer was filtered and the filtrate was cooled to 20 – 25 °C. While maintaining this temperature range, a solution of 2-propanol (362.8 kg) and water (924.3 kg) were added to the reactor. The solution was cooled to 15 -20 °C and was seeded (3.7 kg, 0.5 wt%). The slurry was cooled to 0 – 5 °C over at least 2 h and aged for at least 30 min. Water (2403.1 kg) was added while maintain a reaction temperature of <20 °C. The slurry was cooled to 0 – 5 °C and aged for 30 – 40 min. The slurry was warmed to 15 – 20 °C, aged for 30 – 40 min, cooled to 0 – 5 °C over at least 1 h and aged for at least 2 h. The solids were isolated by filtration, washed with a solution composed of 2-propanol (283.2 kg) and water (1079.5 kg) and dried in vacuo at 50 – 55 °C to constant weight to afford 466.0 kg (87%) of the title compound.
A hydrogenation reactor was charged with methyl (S)-5-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate (30 kg) and MeOH (120 kg), and the slurry was heated to solution at 30 – 40 °C. The solution was cooled to 15 – 25 °C followed by addition of d -tert-butyldicarbonate (21.8 kg, 1.03 eq) and water wet 20% Pd(OH)2/C (0.9 kg, 3 wt%). The
contents of the reactor were degassed under vacuum followed by pressurization with nitrogen. The contents of the reactor were degassed under vacuum followed by pressurization with hydrogen (3 – 4 bar). After 2 h at 22 – 27 °C, the reactor was vented and re-pressurized with hydrogen (3 – 4 bar). The progress of the reaction was monitored for completion (HPLC). After 4.5 h, the reactor was vented and MeOH (90 kg) was charged. The contents of the reactor were warmed to 32 – 42 °C and held for 20 – 30 min. The catalyst was removed by filtration through a bed of diatomite (13 kg) and the spent filter cake was washed with warm (40 – 45 °C) MeOH (25 kg). The combined filtrate and wash was concentrated in vacuo to 2 volumes at <40 °C and MeOH was charged (56 kg). The slurry was heated to 50 – 56 °C and the solution was aged for about 1.5 h. The solution was cooled to 20 – 30 °C, the slurry was aged for about 1 h, water (60 kg) was added and the slurry was aged for about 2 h. The slurry was cooled to about -5 °C and aged for about 8 h. The solids were isolated by centrifugation, washed with 1 :4 (v/v) MeOH – water (57.5 kg) and dried in vacuo at 50 – 60 °C to constant weight to afford 27.6 kg (88.5%) of the title compound.
Description 3b: 1 -(tert-butyl) 2-methyl (2S, 5R)-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)pyrrolidine-1,2-dicarboxylate – method A
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
A hydrogenation reactor was charged with 20% Pd(OH)2/C (water wet; 5.7 kg), methyl (S)-5-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate (186.4 kg), MeOH (8.85V), water (20 kg) and di-te/f-butyldicarbonate (132 kg). The reactor was pressurized with nitrogen followed by venting (three times). The reactor was pressurized with hydrogen followed by venting (three times). The reactor was pressurized with hydrogen (15 bar). After about 2 h at 25 °C, the reactor was vented and re-pressurized with hydrogen (15 bar). The progress of the reaction was monitored for completion (HPLC). After about 4.25 h, the reactor was vented and its contents were filtered, and the filtrate was concentrated in vacuo to about 4.4 volumes at about 35 °C and at about 240 mbar. The contents of the reactor were reheated to 55 – 60 °C, the solution was cooled to 20 – 30 °C over about 2 h and the slurry was aged for about 1 h. Water (285 kg) was added over about 1 h and the slurry was aged for about 1 h. The slurry was cooled to 3 – 7 °C over about 2 h and aged for about 3 h. The solids were isolated by filtration, washed with 1 :4 (v/v) MeOH – water (359 kg) and dried in vacuo at 50 – 55 °C to constant weight to afford 174.6 kg (90%) of the title compound.
Description 3c: l-(tert-butyl) 2-methyl (2S, 5R)-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)pyrrolidine-1 ,2-dicarboxylate – method B
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
A hydrogenation reactor was charged with 20% Pd(OH)2/C (water wet; 3 wt%), methyl (S)-5-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate (100 g), MeOH (4.5V), water (5 g) and 90 wt% di-te/f-butyldicarbonate in THF (1.00 eq). The reactor was pressurized with nitrogen followed by venting (three times). The reactor was pressurized with hydrogen followed by venting (three times). The reactor was pressurized with hydrogen (15 bar). After 1 h at 25 °C, the reactor was vented and re-pressurized with hydrogen (15 bar). The progress of the reaction was monitored for completion (HPLC). After 5 h, the reactor was vented and its contents were warmed to about 45 °C. The catalyst was removed by filtration through a warmed filter, and the filtrate was re-heated to 45 – 55 °C and held for about 30 minutes. The filtrate was concentrated in vacuo to about 4.4 volumes at 30 – 40 °C. The residue was cooled to 20 – 30 °C over at least 1 h, water (1.5V) was added over about 45 minutes and the slurry was aged for about 1 h. The slurry was cooled to 3 – 7 °C over about 2 h and aged for about 3 h. The solids were isolated by filtration, washed with 1 :4 (v/v) MeOH – water (2V) and dried in vacuo at 50 – 60 °C to constant weight to afford 88.9 g (86%) of the title compound.
The flow direction was from top to bottom (feed solution and hydrogen); and the hydrogen flow rate was 50 ml_ / min (while maintaining desired reaction pressure).
A 25 ml_ tube was packed with glass wool, sand, spherical catalyst beads (3% Pd/0-AI203 (1.0 – 1.2 mm spherical pellets)), sand and glass wool to give a 10 ml_ packed bed volume. 4 wt% methyl (S)-5-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate and di-ferf- butyldicarbonate (1.2 eq) in MeOH at -5 °C (feed solution 1) was then passed through the flow reactor at 0.08 – 0.10 ml_ / min, at a temperature of 53 – 61 °C and at a pressure of 10 – 15 bar. The collected solution contained a mixture of 1-(te/f-butyl) 2-methyl (2S,5f?)-5-(4- (benzyloxy)phenyl)pyrrolidine-1 ,2-dicarboxylate and 1-(te/f- butyl) 2-methyl (2S, 5f?)-5-(4- hydroxyphenyl)pyrrolidine-1 ,2-dicarboxylate in MeOH (feed solution 2) was passed through the flow reactor at 0.10 mL / min, at a temperature of 78 – 81 °C and at a pressure of 3 bar to produce about 600 g of a methanol solution primarily containing 1-(te/f-butyl) 2-methyl (2S, 5f?)-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)pyrrolidine-1 ,2-dicarboxylate. This solution was concentrated in vacuo at a temperature of about 40 °C to a net weight of about 3.6X the amount of the input methyl (S)-5-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate. After stirring the mixture at ambient temperature for 15 – 20 min, water (2V) was added over about 30 min, the resulting mixture was aged for about 30 min, cooled to about 0 °C and aged for about 30 min. Solids were isolated by filtration, washed with ice cold 1 :4 (v/v) MeOH – water (2 X 1V) and dried to constant weight in vacuo at 55 °C to afford 23.51 g (88%) of the title compound.
A reactor was charged with 1-(te/f-butyl) 2-methyl (2S, 5f?)-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)pyrrolidine- 1 ,2-dicarboxylate (1 10 kg), powdered K2CO3 (71.5 kg (1.5 equiv)) and ACN (429 kg). With good stirring, 2-fluorobenzyl bromide (68.2 kg (1.05 equiv)) and ACN (15 kg) were charged and the mixture was heated to 86 – 94 °C; the progress of the reaction was monitored (HPLC). Upon completion, the slurry was cooled to 40 – 50 °C, filtered and the spent filter cake was washed with fresh ACN (175 kg).
To the ACN filtrate was charged powdered K2CO3 (94.6 kg (2.0 equiv)) and formamide (308 kg (20 equiv)) and the mixture was heated to 86 – 94 °C; the progress of the reaction was monitored (HPLC). Upon completion, the slurry was cooled to 70 – 75 °C and water (1 150 kg) was added while maintaining a reaction temperature of >70 °C. Following the addition the solution was aged for about 30 min, cooled to 65 – 70 °C, seeded (0.55 kg) and aged for 3 – 4 h. The slurry was cooled to 50 – 60 °C, aged 3 – 4 h, cooled to 20 – 30 °C and aged for 3 – 4 h. The solids were isolated by centrifugation, washed twice with water (220 kg) and dried in vacuo at 30 – 40 °C for 4 – 8 h and at 50 – 60 °C for 4 – 8 h to yield 128.75 kg (87.5%) of the title compound.
Description 4b: iert-butyl (2S, 5 ?)-2-carbamoyl-5-(4-((2- fluorobenzyl)oxy)phenyl)pyrrolidine-1-carboxylate (D4b) (NaOMe – MeOH procedure using 2-fluorobenzyl bromide in DMF)
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
A reactor was charged with 1-(te/f-butyl) 2-methyl (2S, 5f?)-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)pyrrolidine- 1 ,2-dicarboxylate (1.0 kg), anhydrous DMF (2.9 L), 2-fluorobenzyl bromide (430 mL (1.12 equiv)) and anhydrous DMF (0.1 L). The solution was cooled to about 15 °C. With good stirring, 741 mL (1.05 equiv) 4.4M NaOMe-MeOH solution was added while maintaining a temperature of <20 °C. Following the charge, the contents of the reactor were warmed to about 25 °C, aged for about 1 h and 44 mL (0.06 equiv) 4.4M NaOMe-MeOH solution was added over about 5 min. The progress of the reaction was monitored (HPLC).
Upon completion, formamide (2.5 L) was charged followed by addition of 81 1 mL (1.15 equiv) 4.4M NaOMe-MeOH solution while maintaining a temperature of <25 °C. The contents of the reactor were aged for about 1 h and 516 mL (0.73 equiv) 4.4M NaOMe-MeOH solution was added while maintaining a temperature of <25 °C. The progress of the reaction was monitored (HPLC). Upon completion, a solution of glacial acetic acid (350 mL (2.0 equiv) in water (2.2 L)) was added over about 10 min. The slurry was heated to about 70 °C and aged for about 1 h. Water (1.8 L) was added over about 1 h and the slurry was cooled to about 3 °C over 3 h and aged for about 10 h. The solids were isolated by filtration, washed twice with water (2 L) and dried to constant weight in vacuo at 80 °C to afford 1.21 kg (94%) of the title compound.
Description 4c: iert-butyl (2S, 5 ?)-2-carbamoyl-5-(4-((2- fluorobenzyl)oxy)phenyl)pyrrolidine-1-carboxylate (D4c) (NaOMe – MeOH procedure using 2-fluorobenzyl bromide in DMF) (Alternative Procedure)
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
A reactor was charged with 1-(te/f-butyl) 2-methyl (2S, 5f?)-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)pyrrolidine- 1 ,2-dicarboxylate (100 g), anhydrous DMF (290 mL), 2-fluorobenzyl bromide (42.2 mL (1.10 equiv)) and anhydrous DMF (10 mL). The solution was cooled to about 15 °C. With good stirring, 75 mL (1.06 equiv) 4.4M NaOMe-MeOH solution was added over a period of approximately 30 min while maintaining a temperature of <20 °C. Following the charge, the contents of the reactor were warmed to about 25 °C and aged for about 2 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored (HPLC).
Upon completion, formamide (250 mL) was charged followed by addition of 133 mL (1.88 equiv) 4.4M NaOMe-MeOH solution over approximately 45 min while maintaining a temperature of <25 °C. The contents of the reactor were aged for about 4 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored (HPLC). Upon completion, a solution of glacial acetic acid (35 mL (2.0 equiv) in water (100 mL) was added over about 30 min. The slurry was heated to about 60 °C. Water (300 mL) was then charged to the reactor over about 1 h, and the slurry was aged for about 1 h. The slurry was cooled to about 3 °C over 3 h and aged for about 1 h. The solids were isolated by filtration, washed twice with water (200 mL) and dried to constant weight in vacuo at 80 °C to afford 120.0 g (93%) of the title compound.
Description 4d: iert-butyl (2S, 5/?)-2-carbamoyl-5-(4-((2- fluorobenzyl)oxy)phenyl)pyrrolidine-1-carboxylate (D4d) (NaOMe – MeOH procedure using 2-fluorobenzyl chloride in DMF)
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
A reactor was charged with 1-(te/f- butyl) 2-methyl (2S, 5R)-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)pyrrolidine- 1 ,2-dicarboxylate (7.50 g), anhydrous DMF (22.5 mL) and 2-fluorobenzyl chloride (3.20 mL (1.15 equiv)). The solution was cooled to about 15 °C. With good stirring, 5.6 mL (1.06 equiv) 4.4M NaOMe-MeOH solution was added while maintaining a temperature of <25 °C. Following the charge, the contents of the reactor were warmed to about 45 °C over 20 min. The progress of the reaction was monitored (HPLC).
Upon completion, the contents of the reactor were cooled to about 25 °C over about 10 min. Formamide (19 mL) was charged followed by addition of 5.8 mL (1.1 equiv) 4.4M NaOMe- MeOH solution while maintaining a temperature of <25 °C. The contents of the reactor were aged for about 1 h and 3.7 mL (0.7 equiv) 4.4M NaOMe-MeOH solution was added while maintaining a temperature of <25 °C. The progress of the reaction was monitored (HPLC). Upon completion, a solution of glacial acetic acid (2.6 mL (2.0 equiv)) in water (7.5 mL) was added over about 25 min. The slurry was heated to about 65 °C and water (22.5 mL) was added to the solution over about 1 h. The slurry was aged for about 30 min, was cooled to 0 – 5 °C over about 3 h and aged for about 30 min. The solids were isolated by filtration, washed twice with water (7.5 mL) and dried to constant weight in vacuo at 80 °C to afford 8.39 g (90%) of the title compound.
Description 4e: iert-butyl (2S, 5/?)-2-carbamoyl-5-(4-((2- fluorobenzyl)oxy)phenyl)pyrrolidine-1-carboxylate (D4e) (NaOMe – MeOH procedure using 2-fluorobenzyl chloride in DMSO)
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
A reactor was charged with 1-(te/f- butyl) 2-methyl (2S, 5R)-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)pyrrolidine-1 ,2-dicarboxylate (7.50 g), anhydrous DMSO (22.5 mL) and 2-fluorobenzyl chloride (3.20 mL (1.15 equiv)). The solution was cooled to about 15 °C. With good stirring, 5.5 mL (1.06 equiv) 4.5M NaOMe-MeOH solution was added while maintaining a temperature of <25 °C. Following the charge, the contents of the reactor were warmed to about 25 °C over 5 min. The progress of the reaction was monitored (HPLC).
Upon completion, formamide (19 mL) was charged followed by addition of 9.73 mL (1.88 equiv) 4.5M NaOMe-MeOH solution over about 45 min. The progress of the reaction was monitored (HPLC). Upon completion, a solution of glacial acetic acid (2.6 mL (2.0 equiv)) in water (7.5 mL) was added over about 25 min. The slurry was heated to about 65 °C and water (22.5 mL) was added to the solution over about 1 h. The slurry was aged for about 30 min, was cooled to 0 – 5 °C over about 3 h and aged for about 30 min. The solids were isolated by filtration, washed twice with water (7.5 mL) and dried to constant weight in vacuo at 80 °C to afford 8.72 g (90%) of the title compound.
Description 4f: iert-butyl (2S, 5/?)-2-carbamoyl-5-(4-((2-fluorobenzyl)oxy)phenyl)pyrrolidine-1-carboxylate (D4f) (f-BuOK procedure using 2-fluorobenzyl bromide in ACN – formamide)
f-BuOK Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
A reactor was charged with 1-(te/f- butyl) 2-methyl (2S, 5R)-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)pyrrolidine-1 ,2-dicarboxylate (10.0 g), anhydrous ACN (30 mL), 2-fluorobenzyl bromide (4.18 mL (1.05 equiv)) and formamide (10 mL). The solution was cooled to 0 – 5 °C. With good stirring, 3.67 g (1.05 equiv) f-BuOK was added followed by warming the contents of the reactor to about 15 °C. The progress of the reaction was monitored (HPLC).
Upon completion, the contents of the reactor were cooled to 0 – 5 °C and 4.71 g (1.35 equiv) f-BuOK was added followed by warming the contents of the reactor to about 15 °C. The progress of the reaction was monitored (HPLC). Upon completion, the contents of the reactor were warmed to about 65 °C and a solution of glacial acetic acid (4.14 mL (2.3 equiv)) in water (10 mL) was added. Additional water (40 mL) was added over about 30 min. The contents of the reactor were cooled to 0 – 5 °C and filtered. The filter cake was washed twice with water (10 mL) and dried to constant weight in vacuo at 80 °C to afford 10.93 g (85%) of the title compound.
Description 4g: iert-butyl (2S, 5 ?)-2-carbamoyl-5-(4-((2-fluorobenzyl)oxy)phenyl)pyrrolidine-1-carboxylate (D4g) (f-BuONa procedure using 2-fluorobenzyl bromide in ACN – formamide)
f-BuONa-THF
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
A reactor was charged with 1-(te/f- butyl) 2-methyl (2S, 5R)-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)pyrrolidine-1 ,2-dicarboxylate (10.0 g), anhydrous ACN (30 mL), 2-fluorobenzyl bromide (4.18 mL (1.05 equiv)) and formamide (1.5 mL). The solution was cooled to 0 – 5 °C. With good stirring, 16.4 mL (1.05 equiv) 2M f-BuONa – THF solution was added followed by warming the contents of the reactor to about 15 °C. The progress of the reaction was monitored (HPLC).
Upon completion, the contents of the reactor were cooled to 0 – 5 °C and formamide (8.5 mL) was added, followed by 21 mL (1.35 equiv) 2M f-BuONa – THF solution, and the contents of the reactor were warmed to about 15 °C. The progress of the reaction was monitored (HPLC). Upon completion, the contents of the reactor were warmed to about 65 °C and a solution of glacial acetic acid (4.14 mL (2.3 equiv)) in water (10 mL) was added. Additional water (40 mL) was added over about 30 min. The contents of the reactor were cooled to 0 – 5 °C and filtered. The filter cake was washed twice with water (10 mL) and dried to constant weight in vacuo at 80 °C to afford 11.06 g (86%) of the title compound.
A reactor was charged with 1-(te/f-butyl) 2-methyl (2S, 5f?)-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)pyrrolidine-1 ,2-dicarboxylate (264 Kg), anhydrous DMF (748 kg) and 2-fluorobenzyl bromide (171 Kg (1.10 eq)). The solution was cooled to about 15 °C. With good stirring, 157 Kg (1.06 eq) 30% NaOMe-MeOH solution was added over at least 30 min while maintaining a temperature between 20 – 30 °C. Following the charge, the line was rinsed forward with MeOH (18 kg), and the batch was maintained at about 25 °C for at least 1 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored for completion (HPLC).
Upon completion, formamide (749 Kg) was charged followed by a line rinse with MeOH (18 kg). 279 Kg (1.88 eq) 30% NaOMe-MeOH solution was added over at least 45 min while maintaining a temperature of about 25 °C followed by a line rinse with MeOH (18 kg). The contents of the reactor were maintained at about 25 °C with agitation for about 4 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored for completion (HPLC). Upon completion, the batch was transferred to a second reactor and the equipment was rinsed forward with MeOH (155 Kg). Glacial acetic acid (97 Kg) was added to the batch over at least 15 min while maintaining a temperature of 20 – 30 °C followed by the addition of water (264 Kg). The batch was heated to 60 °C and water (792 Kg) was added over at least 2 h with good agitation. The batch was maintained at 60 °C with agitation for at least 1 h. The batch was cooled to about 2 °C over at least 3 h and aged for at least 1 h. The solids were isolated by filtration and washed twice with water (528 Kg per wash). The wet cake was dried to constant weight in vacuo at 67 °C to afford 315.4 kg (93%) of the title compound.
A reactor was charged with 1-(te/f-butyl) 2-methyl (2S, 5f?)-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)pyrrolidine-1 ,2-dicarboxylate (70 g), anhydrous DMF (198.2 g) and 2-fluorobenzyl bromide (45.3 g (1.10 equiv)). With good agitation, 41.4 g (1.06 equiv) 30% NaOMe-MeOH solution was added over about 60 min while maintaining a temperature of 20 – 30 °C. The addition funnel was rinsed forward into the reactor with MeOH (2.4 g). The batch was maintained at about 25 °C for at least 1 h; the progress of the reaction was monitored for completion (HPLC).
Upon completion, formamide (238.1 g) was charged followed by rinsing forward the charging equipment with MeOH (2.4 g). 30% NaOMe-MeOH solution (66.5 g (1.70 equiv)) was added over 45 min while maintaining temperature at about 25 °C. The addition funnel was rinsed forward into the reactor with MeOH (2.4 g). The batch was stirred for about 4 h at 25 °C; the progress of the reaction was monitored for completion (HPLC). Upon completion, the batch was transferred to a second reactor and the equipment was rinsed forward with MeOH (20.6 g). Glacial acetic acid (25.7 g) was added while maintaining a temperature of 20 – 30 °C. Water (70 g) was added over about 20 min and the batch was heated to 60 °C. Water (280 g) was added over at least 2 h with good agitation. The batch was maintained at 60 °C with agitation for at least 1 h, cooled to 0-3 °C over at least 3 h and aged for at least 1 h. The solids were isolated by filtration, washed with water/MeOH 70:30 v/v (140 ml_) and water (140 g). The wet cake was dried to constant weight in vacuo at 80 °C to afford 83.7 g (93%) of the title compound.
A reactor was charged with te/f-butyl (2S, 5f?)-2-carbamoyl-5-(4-((2-fluorobenzyl)oxy)phenyl)pyrrolidine-1-carboxylate (which may be prepared as described in Description 4) (375.1 kg) and ACN (825.6 kg). With good agitation, methanesulfonic acid (1 14.8 kg (1.3 equiv) was added while maintaining a reaction temperature of 20 – 25 °C followed by ACN (50 kg). The contents of the reactor were warmed to 40 – 50 °C and aged for 2 – 3 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored (HPLC). Upon completion, a solution of 1.0N NH4OH (377 kg) was added while maintaining a reaction temperature of 40 – 50 °C. The reaction temperature was raised to 48 – 52 °C and 1.0N NH4OH (1495 kg) was added slowly with good stirring while maintaining the reaction temperature within this range. The slurry was cooled to -3 to 3 °C over 3 – 4 h and was aged for 1 – 2 h. The solids were isolated by centrifugation (3 drops) and each portion was washed twice with water (182 – 189 kg). The solids were dried in vacuo at 30 °C for 4 h, at 50 °C for 4 h and to constant weight at 80 °C (10 h) to afford 256.4 kg (90.5%) of the title compound.
A reactor was charged with 2-propanol (672 kg) and the solvent was cooled to -10 to 0 °C. With good agitation, HCI (90 kg) was introduced while maintaining a reaction temperature of -10 – 0 °C. A sample of the solution was removed for concentration determination.
A reactor was charged with te/f-butyl (2S, 5f?)-2-carbamoyl-5-(4-((2-fluorobenzyl)oxy)phenyl)pyrrolidine-1-carboxylate (which may be prepared as described in Description 4) (160 kg) and 2-propanol (1280 kg). Wth good agitation, the prepared HCI – 2- propanol solution (5.3 eq) was added while maintaining a reaction temperature of 20 – 30 °C. The contents of the reactor were warmed to 30 – 35 °C and aged for 12 – 16 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored (HPLC). Upon completion, the contents of the reactor were cooled to 0 – 10 °C, concentrated and aged for 2 – 3 h at 0 – 10 °C. The solids were filtered, washed with 2-propanol (105 kg) and dried in vacuo at 60 – 70 °C for 15 – 20 h to afford 132 kg (96%) of the title compound.
Description 5c: (2S,5R)-5-(4-((2-fluorobenzyl)oxy)phenyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide – method A
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
A reactor was charged with terf-butyl (2S, 5S)-2-carbamoyl-5-(4-((2- fluorobenzyl)oxy)phenyl)pyrrolidine-1-carboxylate (307 Kg) and acetonitrile (612 Kg). With good agitation, methanesulfonic acid (30 Kg (1.28 equiv)) was added over at least 30 min while maintaining a reaction temperature of 20 – 30 °C. The batch was warmed to 30 °C, aged for about 30 min and heated to 45 °C over about 30 min. The batch was maintained at 45°C for 2 h; the progress of the reaction was monitored for completion (HPLC). Upon completion, the batch was transferred to a second reactor, rinsed forward with acetonitrile (108 Kg) and 1.7% aqueous NH4OH solution (304 Kg) was added while maintaining a temperature of about 40 – 50 °C. The reaction temperature was raised to about 46 – 52 °C and 1.7% NH4OH solution (1216 Kg) was added slowly over 2 h with good stirring while maintaining the reaction temperature within this range. The batch was aged at 50 °C for about 1 h, cooled to 0 °C over at least 3 h and aged for about 1 h. The solids were isolated by filtration and washed twice with water (614 Kg per wash). The solids were dried in vacuo at 70 °C to constant weight to afford 218 Kg (94%) of the title compound.
A reactor was charged with terf-butyl (2S, 5S)-2-carbamoyl-5-(4-((2- fluorobenzyl)oxy)phenyl)pyrrolidine-1-carboxylate (100 g) and ACN (199.5 g). With good agitation, methanesulfonic acid (29.7 g (1.28 equiv)) was added while maintaining a reaction temperature of 20 – 30 °C. The batch was warmed to 30 °C, aged for at least 30 min and heated to 45 °C over at least 30 min. The batch was maintained at 45 °C for 2 h; the progress of the reaction was monitored for completion (HPLC). Upon completion, the batch was transferred to a second reactor; the first reactor was rinsed forward with ACN (35.4 g). A solution of 1.7% aqueous NH4OH (99.0 g) was added at 40 – 50 °C over at least 15 min. The reaction temperature was raised to 49 °C and 1.7% NH4OH solution (396.0 g) was added slowly over at least 2 h with good stirring while maintaining the reaction temperature at about 49 °C. The slurry was aged for 30 – 90 min, cooled to 0°C over 3 h and aged for at least 1 h. The solids were isolated by filtration and washed with water/acetonitrile 90: 10 v/v (200 mL) and water (200 g). The solids were dried in vacuo at 70 °C to constant weight to afford 71.6 g (94%) of the title compound.
A reactor was charged with terf-butyl (2S, 5S)-2-carbamoyl-5-(4-((2-fluorobenzyl)oxy)phenyl)pyrrolidine-1-carboxylate (160 kg) and isopropanol (1280 kg) at 20 -30 °C. A solution of 2.6M HCI in isopropanol (5.3 eq) was added over about 2 h at 20 – 35 °C. The contents of the reactor were warmed to 30 – 35 °C, and the progress of the reaction was monitored for completion (HPLC). The contents of the reactor were cooled to about 10 °C over about 3 h, concentrated in vacuo for about 1 h and aged at 5 – 10 °C for about 2 h under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen. Solids were filtered, washed with isopropanol (125 kg) and dried to constant weight in vacuo at 60 – 70 °C to give 132.05 kg (96%) of the title compound.
A hydrogenation reactor was charged with 10% Pd(OH)2/C (water wet; 1.06 g), benzyl (S)-5-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)-2-((tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)-5-oxopentanoate (23 g), MeOH (140
ml_) and di-te/f-butyldicarbonate (1 1.3 g, 1.02 eq). The reactor was pressurized with hydrogen (8 bar) and stirred (300 rpm) for 3 h at ambient temperature followed by stirring at 50 °C for an additional 5 h. The contents of the reactor were cooled to ambient temperature and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated to dryness and the residue was reconstituted in warm MeOH (30 ml_). The contents of the flask were cooled to ambient temperature. The solids were isolated by filtration and dried in vacuo at 60 °C to constant weight to afford 9.6 g (60%) of the title compound.
A hydrogenation reactor was charged with 20% Pd(OH)2/C (water wet; 2.25 g), benzyl (S)-5-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)-2-((terf-butoxycarbonyl)amino)-5-oxopentanoate (74.59 g (71.00 g activity)), di-terf-butyldicarbonate (35.27 g, 1.01 eq) and MeOH (415 g). Following three vacuum / nitrogen break cycles, the reactor was pressurized with hydrogen (4 bar) and stirred (-2200 rpm) for about 105 min at 25 °C, then heated to 35 °C and held for an additional 1 h. The reactor was vented, additional MeOH (59 g) was charged, and the reduction was continued at 35 °C, 4 bar and -2200 rpm. The progress of the reaction was monitored for completion (HPLC). Celite® (2.5 g) was added, and the mixture was filtered through a pad of Celite® (2.5 g) and the spent pad was washed with warm MeOH (59 g). The filtrate was concentrated at 40 °C and 200 mbar to a net weight of about 179 g. The contents of the flask were warmed to solution at about 55 °C, slowly cooled to ambient temperature and aged for about 30 min. Water (100 g) was added over about 1 h, and the mixture was aged overnight at ambient temperature. The mixture was cooled to 0-5 °C, aged for about 3 h and filtered. The solids were washed with cold 1 :4 (v/v) MeOH – water (2 X 48 g) and dried in vacuo at 55 °C to constant weight to afford 43.98 g (89%) of the title compound.
///////////VIXOTRIGINE, NEW PATENT, WO-2019071162, BIOGEN INC
Thiotepa was developed by the American Cyanamid company in the early 1950s and reported to media outlets in 1953.[3] In 1959, thiotepa was registered with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a drug therapy for several solid cancers.[4]
Thiotepa is indicated for use in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. This can be with or without total body irradiation (TBI), as a conditioning treatment prior to allogeneic or autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation (HPCT) in hematological diseases in adult and pediatric patients. These diseases include Hodgkin’s disease and leukaemia. Thiotepa is also used with high-dose chemotherapy with HPCT support to treat certain solid tumors in adult and pediatric patients.[6]
Thiotepa is used as intravesical chemotherapy in bladder cancer.[7]
It may be used prophylactically to prevent seeding of tumor cells at cystoscopic biopsy; as an adjunctive agent at the time of biopsy; or as a therapeutic agent to prevent recurrence after cystoscopic resection of bladder tumor (transurethral resection of bladder tumor, TURBT). For intravesical use, thiotepa is given in 30 mg doses weekly, for four to six weeks. Efficacy in tumor control may reach 55 percent. The main toxicity of this therapy is bone marrow suppression due to systemic absorption of the drug.
^Maanen, M. J.; Smeets, C. J.; Beijnen, J. H. (2000). “Chemistry, pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of N,N’,N” -triethylenethiophosphoramide (ThioTEPA)”. Cancer Treatment Reviews. 26 (4): 257–268. doi:10.1053/ctrv.2000.0170. PMID10913381.
^Sykes, M. P.; Karnofsky, D. A.; Philips, F. S.; Burchenal, J. H. (1953). “Clinical studies on triethylenephosphoramide and diethylenephosphoramide, compounds with nitrogen-mustard-like activity”. Cancer. 6 (1): 142–148. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(195301)6:1<142::AID-CNCR2820060114>3.0.CO;2-W.
^Kim, Kyu-Won; Roh, Jae Kyung; Wee, Hee-Jun; Kim, Chan (2016). Cancer Drug Discovery: Science and History. Springer. p. 82. ISBN978-94-024-0844-7.
In 2013, Vifor Pharma and Zeria Pharmaceutical signed an exclusive licensing agreement for the product’s development and commercialization in Japan for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia.
Ferric carboxymaltose is an intravenously-administered iron complex which was first launched in Germany following E.U. approval in 2007 for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia (IDA)
Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is a common haematological complication with potentially serious clinical consequences that may require intravenous iron therapy.
Ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) is a stable, non-dextran iron formulation administered intravenously in large single doses to treat IDA. It is an iron complex that consists of a ferric hydroxide core stabilized by a carbohydrate shell. It is commercially available in the market under the trade name Ferinject®
Ferric carboxymaltose has been designed to provide high iron utilisation and to have a better benefit to risk profile than iron dextran and iron sucrose therapy. In the case of iron dextran, a key risk is the reaction with anti-dextran antibodies leading to the well known dextran induced anaphylactic reactions. In the case of iron sucrose, the negative characteristics include high pH, high osmolarity, low dosage limits and the long duration of administration.
Ferric carboxymaltose allows for controlled delivery of iron within the cells of the reticuloendothelial system and subsequent delivery to the iron-binding proteins ferritin and transferrin, with minimal risk of release of large amounts of ionic iron in the serum.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,076,798 discloses a process for the preparation of iron(III)-polymaltose complex compounds. The iron(III)-polymaltose complex compound
preferably has a molecular weight in the range from 20,000 to 500,000 daltons, preferably from 30,000 to 80,000 daltons.
U.S. Patent No. 7,612,109 discloses water-soluble iron carbohydrate complexes (ferric carboxymaltose complexes) obtainable from an aqueous solution of an iron (III) salt, preferably iron (III) chloride, and an aqueous solution of the oxidation product of one or more maltodextrins using an aqueous hypochlorite solution.
PCT application No.WO2011/055374, discloses a process for the preparation of iron (III) carboxymaltose complex using ferric hydroxide.
In Netherlands article, starch 41 (1989) Nr .8, S. 303-309 transition metal ions enhance the selectivity of oxidations by H2O2 to produce polysaccharides to polydicarbonates by glycol cleavage of the C2-C3 vicinal diol moiety.
Even though many prior art processes reported methods for the preparation of Iron(III) carboxymaltose, each process has some limitations with respect to yield, purity and scale-up etc.
EXAMPLES
Example- 1: Preparation of trivalent iron carboxymaltose
Step (i)
20grams of anhydrous iron(III)chloride was dissolved in 50ml of purified water at room temperature for 10 minutes stirring. To this 2gm of maltodextrin (13-17 dextrose equivalents) was added and stirred for 10 minutes at room temperature. The obtained brownish-yellow clear solution was cooled to 0-5°C and the pH of the reaction mixture was adjusted to 7.0 by adding 20% aqueous sodium hydroxide solution. A brown colour precipitate obtained was maintained for 1 hour at 0-5°C and collected through filtration (Wet cake wt. ~ 65. Og). The cake was suck dried and used for next step.
Step (ii)
20grams of maltodextrin having a dextrose equivalents of 13-17 were dissolved in 50ml of purified water and the solution was metered in the course of 20 minutes to a stirred mixture of 2.66gm of Starks catalyst (methyl trioctyl ammonium hydrogen sulfate prepared in-situ from 2gm of Aliquat 336 and 0.66gm of NaHSO4.H2O), 0.8gm of sodium tungstate dihydrate and 0.37gm of TEMPO at RT. 31.12gm of hydrogen peroxide solution (50-55% w/v) was then added drop wise over a period of 40 minutes at 25-30°C and raised the temperature to90-95°C and stirred for 3 hours. After cooling to room temperature, a second portion of 15.5gm of H2O2 solution was metered in the course of 15 minutes at 25-30°C and the resulting solution was again refluxed at 90-95°C for 1 hour. After cooling to 35-40°C, wet cake of step (i) (ferric hydroxide maltodextrin complex) was added, with stirring. 14.0ml of 20% aqueous sodium hydroxide solution was added to adjust the reaction mass pH to 10- 10.5 and the slurry was heated to 50°C, stirred for 30 minutes. Then the reaction mixture was acidified to pH 5.5 by adding hydrochloric acid solution and the mixture was maintained at 50°C for another 30 minutes. Further temperature was raised to 95-100°C and stirred for 14 hours. Then the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and filtered through a celite pad. Thereafter, the iron(III)complex was isolated by precipitation by adding ethanol (237. Og) drop wise at room temperature. The obtained brown amorphous solid was dried under vacuum at 50°C for 2-3 hours. Molecular weight = 202 kDa. Iron content = 23.38% w/w
Example-2:
20grams of maltodextrin (13-17 dextrose equivalents) were dissolved in 50ml of purified water and the solution was added to a stirred mixture of 2.66gm of Starks catalyst and 0.2gm of Na2WO4.2H2O at room temperature in the course of 20 minutes. 24grams of H2O2 solution was metered in the course of 45 minutes at 25-30°C and raised the temperature to 90-95°C and stirred for 2 hours and cooled to room temperature.
The solution was added to another portion of a stirred mixture of 1.33gm of Starks catalyst and 0.2gm of Na2WO4.2H2O at room temperature. Thereafter, 12gm of
H2O2solution was added drop wise over a period of 20 minutes at 25-30°C and the resulting reaction mixture was again refluxed at 90-95°C for 2 hours. After cooling to 25-30°C, wet cake of step (i) from example- 1 was added and stirred for 10 minutes. 14ml of 20% NaOH solution was added to adjust the reaction mass pH to 10- 10.5 and the slurry was heated to 50°C, stirred for 30 minutes. Then the mixture was acidified to pH 5.5 by adding hydrochloric acid solution and the solution was maintained at 50°C for another 30 minutes. Further temperature was raised to 95-100°C and stirred for 13 hours. Then the reaction solution was cooled to room temperature, adjusted pH to 5.5 to 6.0 with 20% NaOH solution and filtered through a celite pad. Then the iron(III)complex was isolated by precipitating with ethanol (331.0g) addition drop wise at room temperature. The obtained brown amorphous solid was dried in vacuum at 50°C for 2-3 hours. Molecular weight = 200 kDa. Iron content = 25.57 % w/w
Example-3:
20grams of maltodextrin (13-17 dextrose equivalents) were dissolved in 100ml of purified water and the solution was added to a stirred mixture of 2.66gm of Starks catalyst, 0.8gm of Na2WO4.2H2O and 0.37gm of TEMPO at room temperature over a period of 15 minutes. 30grams of H2O2solution was added drop wise in the course of 1 hour at 25-30°C and raised the temperature to 90-95°C, stirred for 3 hours and cooled to room temperature.
At 25-30°C, wet cake of step (i) from example- 1 was added and stirred for 10 minutes. A pH of 10-10.5 was established by adding 12ml of 20% NaOH solution and the slurry was heated to 50°C, stirred at this temperature for 30 minutes. Then the reaction mixture was acidified to pH 5.5 with hydrochloric acid addition and the mixture was maintained at 50°C for another 30 minutes. Further temperature was raised to 95-100°C and stirred for 14 hours. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature, adjusted pH to 6.0 to 6.5 with 20% NaOH solution and filtered through a celite pad. Then the iron(III)complex was isolated by precipitating with ethanol (343.0g) addition drop wise at room temperature. The obtained brown
amorphous solid was dried in vacuum at 50°C for 2-3 hours. Molecular weight = 260 kDa. Iron content = 23.67 % w/w
Example-4:
20grams of maltodextrin (13-17 dextrose equivalents) were dissolved in 50ml of purified water and the solution was added to a stirred mixture of 2.66gm of Starks catalyst, 0.8gm of Na2WO4.2H2O and 0.37g of TEMPO at room temperature over a period of 15 minutes. 30grams of H2O2 solution was added drop wise over a period of 1 hour at 55-60°C and the temperature was raised to 90-95 °C, stirred for 3 hours and cooled to room temperature. After cooling to 25-30°C, wet cake of step (i) from example- 1 was added and stirred for 10 minutes. A pH of 10-10.5 was established by adding 12ml of 20% NaOH solution and the slurry was heated to 50°C, stirred at this temperature for 30 minutes. Then the reaction mixture was acidified to pH 5.5 with hydrochloric acid addition and was maintained at 50°C for another 30 minutes. Further temperature was raised to 95-100°C and stirred for 12 hours. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature, adjusted pH to 6.0 to 6.5 with 20% NaOH solution and filtered through a celite pad. Then the iron(III)complex was isolated by precipitating with ethanol (343.0g) addition drop wise at room temperature. The obtained brown amorphous solid was dried under vacuum at 50°C for 2-3 hours. Molecular weight = 261 kDa. Iron content = 22.85 % w/w
Example-5:
Step (i)
16grams of anhydrous iron(III)chloride was dissolved in 50ml of purified water at room temperature for 10 min stirring. The obtained brownish-yellow clear solution was cooled to 0-5°C and the pH was adjusted to 7.0 first by adding aqueous sodium carbonate solution (21gm of Na2CO3dissolved in 102 ml of purified water) and then by adding 20% NaOH solution. A brown colour precipitate obtained was maintained for 1 hour at 0-5°C and collected through filtration (Wet wt. ~54.0g). The cake was suck dried and used for next step.
Step (ii)
20grams of maltodextrin (13-17 dextrose equivalents) were dissolved in 50ml of purified water and the solution was added to a stirred mixture of 2.66gm of Starks catalyst, 0.8gm of Na2WO4.2H2O and 0.37gm of TEMPO at room temperature over a period of 15 minutes. 30gm of H2O2solution was added drop wise over a period of 1 hour at 25-30°C and the temperature was raised to 90-95°C, stirred for 3 hours and cooled to room temperature.
At 25-30°C, wet cake of step (i) added and stirred for 10 minutes. 20% NaOH solution was added drop wise to adjust the reaction mass pH tolO-10.5 and the slurry was heated to 50°C, stirred for 30 minutes. Then the solution was acidified to pH 5.5 with hydrochloric acid addition and the solution was kept at 50°C for another 30 minutes. Further temperature was raised to 95-100°C and stirred for 12 hours. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature, adjusted pH to 6.0 to 6.5 with 20% NaOH solution and filtered through a celite pad. Then the iron(III)complex was isolated by precipitating with ethanol (315.0g) addition drop wise at room temperature. The obtained brown amorphous solid was dried under vacuum at 50°C for 2-3 hours. Molecular weight = 236 kDa. Iron content = 22.35 % w/w
Example-6:
Step (i)
20grams of anhydrous ferric chloride was dissolved in 50ml of purified water at room temperature for 10 min stirring. The obtained brownish-yellow clear solution was cooled to 0-5°C and the pH was adjusted to 7.0 by adding 20% NaOH solution. A brown colour precipitate obtained was stirred for 1 hour at 0-5°C and collected through filtration. The cake was suck dried and used for next step.
Step (ii)
20grams of maltodextrin (13-17 dextrose equivalents) were dissolved in 50ml of purified water and the solution was added to a stirred mixture of 2.66gm of Starks catalyst, 0.8gm of Na2WO4.2H2O and 0.37g of TEMPO at room temperature over a
period of 15 minutes. 36gm of H2O2 solution was metered in the course of 1 hour at 25-30°C and the resulting solution was heated to 90-95°C, stirred for 3 hours and cooled to room temperature.
After cooling to 25-30°C, wet cake of step (i) was added and stirred for 10 min. 12ml of 20% NaOH solution was added drop wise to adjust the reaction mass pH to 10-10.5 and the slurry was heated to 50°C, kept at this temperature for 30 minutes. Then the solution was acidified to pH 5.5 with hydrochloric acid addition and the solution was maintained at 50°C for another 30 minutes. Further temperature was raised to 95-100°C and stirred for 12 hours. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature, adjusted pH to 6.0 to 6.5 with 20% NaOH solution and filtered through a celite pad. Then the iron(III)complex was isolated by precipitating with ethanol (315.0g) addition at room temperature. The obtained brown amorphous solid was dried under vacuum at 50°C for 2-3 hours. Molecular weight = 365 kDa. Iron content = 23.93 % w/w
Example-7:
20grams of maltodextrin (13-17 dextrose equivalents) were dissolved in 50ml of purified water and the solution was added to a stirred mixture of 2.66gm of Starks catalyst, 0.2gm of Na2WO4.2H2O and 0.37gm of TEMPO at room temperature over a period of 15 minutes. 30gm of H2O2 solution was added drop wise in the course of 1 hour at 25-30°C and the temperature was raised to 90-95°C, stirred for 3 hours and cooled to room temperature.
At 25-30°C, wet cake of step (i) from example-6 was added and stirred for 10 minutes. A pH of 10-10.5 was established by adding 12.0ml of 20% NaOH solution and the slurry was heated to 50°C, stirred at this temperature for 30 minutes. Then the solution was acidified to pH 5.5 with hydrochloric acid addition and the solution was kept at 50°C for another 30 minutes. Further temperature was raised to 95-100°C and stirred for 12 hours. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature; pH was adjusted to 6.0 to 6.5 with 20% NaOH solution and filtered through a celite pad. Then the iron(III)complex was isolated by precipitating with ethanol (276.0g) addition drop wise at room temperature. The obtained brown amorphous solid was dried in vacuum at 50°C for 2-3 hours. Molecular weight = 366 kDa. Iron content = 21.2 % w/w
Example-8:
20grams of maltodextrin (13-17 dextrose equivalents) were dissolved in 50ml of purified water and the solution was added to a stirred mixture of 2.66gm of Starks catalyst and 0.8gm of Na2WO4.2H2O at room temperature over a period of 15 minutes. 30grams of H2O2 solution was metered in the course of 1 hour at 25-30°C and the temperature was raised to 90-95°C, stirred for 3 hours and cooled to room temperature.
At 25-30°C, wet cake of step (i) from example-6 was added and stirred for 10 minutes. A pH of 10-10.5 was established by adding 12ml of 20% NaOH solution and the slurry was heated to 50°C, stirred at this temperature for 30 minutes. Then the solution was acidified to pH 5.5 with hydrochloric acid addition and the solution was maintained at 50°C for another 30 minutes. Further temperature was raised to 95-100°C and stirred for 12 hours. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool to 25-30°C, adjusted pH to 6.0 to 6.5 with 20% NaOH solution and filtered through a celite pad. Then the iron(III)complex was isolated by precipitating with ethanol (315.0g) addition drop wise at room temperature. The obtained brown amorphous solid was dried in vacuum at 50°C for 2-3 hours. Molecular weight = 340 kDa. Iron content = 23.28 % w/w
Example-9:
20grams of maltodextrin (13-17 dextrose equivalents) were dissolved in 50ml of purified water and the solution was added to a stirred mixture of 2.66gm of Starks catalyst, 0.8gm of Na2WO4.2H2O and 0.37gm of TEMPO at room temperature over a period of 15 minutes. 30grams of H2O2 solution was added drop wise over a period of 1 hour at 25-30°C and the resulting solution was heated to 90-95°C, stirred for 3 hours and cooled to room temperature.
At 25-30°C, wet cake of step (i) from example- 1 was added and stirred for 10 minutes. A pH of 10-10.5 was established by adding 12ml of 20% NaOH solution and the slurry was heated to 50°C, stirred at this temperature for 30 minutes. Then the solution was acidified to pH 5.5 with hydrochloric acid addition and the solution was maintained at 50°C for another 30 minutes. Further temperature was raised to 95-100°C and stirred for 12 hours. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature, adjusted pH to 6.0 to 6.5 with 20% NaOH solution and filtered through a celite pad. Then the iron(III)complex was isolated by precipitating with ethanol (304.0g) addition drop wise at room temperature. The obtained brown amorphous solid was dried under vacuum at 50°C for 2-3 hours. Molecular weight = 352 kDa. Iron content = 23.0 % w/w
Example-10:
20grams of maltodextrin (13-17 dextrose equivalents) were dissolved in 50ml of purified water and the solution was added to a stirred mixture of 2.66gm of Starks catalyst, 0.8gm of Na2WO4.2H2O and 0.37gm of TEMPO at room temperature over a period of 15 minutes. 30grams of H2O2 solution was added drop wise in the course of 60 minutes at 25-30°C and the temperature was raised to 90-95°C, stirred for 3 hours and cooled to room temperature.
At 25-30°C, wet cake of step (i) from example- 1 was added and stirred for 10 minutes. 12ml of 20% NaOH solution was added drop wise to adjust the reaction mixture pH to 10-10.5 and the temperature of the slurry was raised to 50°C, stirred at this temperature for 30 minutes. Then the reaction mixture was acidified to pH 5.5 with hydrochloric acid addition and was maintained at 50°C for another 30 minutes. Further temperature was raised to 95-100°C and stirred for 12 hours. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature, adjusted pH to 6.0 to 6.5 with 20% NaOH solution and filtered through a celite pad. Then the iron(III)complex was
isolated by precipitating with ethanol (276.0g) addition drop wise at room temperature. The obtained brown amorphous solid was dried in vacuum at 50°C for 2-3 hours. Molecular weight = 348 kDa. Iron content = 24.6 % w/w
/////////Ferric carboxymaltose , カルボキシマルトース第二鉄 ,Injectafer, Ferinject, Iron dextri-maltose, Unii-6897gxd6oe, Vit 45, Vit-45, japan 2019, Z-213
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today approved Benlysta (belimumab) intravenous (IV) infusion for treatment of children with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) – often referred to as simply “lupus” – a serious chronic disease that causes inflammation and damage to various body tissues and organs. This is the first time that the FDA has approved a treatment for pediatric patients with SLE. Benlysta has been approved for use in adult patients since 2011.
“The agency expedited the review and approval of this application because Benlysta IV fulfils an unmet need for therapies, specifically in pediatric patients with SLE. While there is no cure for lupus, treatment can help our youngest patients control their disease with the hope of …
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today approved Benlysta (belimumab) intravenous (IV) infusion for treatment of children with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) – often referred to as simply “lupus” – a serious chronic disease that causes inflammation and damage to various body tissues and organs. This is the first time that the FDA has approved a treatment for pediatric patients with SLE. Benlysta has been approved for use in adult patients since 2011.
“The agency expedited the review and approval of this application because Benlysta IV fulfils an unmet need for therapies, specifically in pediatric patients with SLE. While there is no cure for lupus, treatment can help our youngest patients control their disease with the hope of improving their quality of life and lowering their risk of long-term organ damage and disability,” said Janet Woodcock, M.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
While childhood-onset SLE is rare, when diagnosed, it is generally more active in children and adolescents than adult patients, particularly in how it impacts organs such as the kidneys and central nervous system. As a result of the disease starting early in life, pediatric patients with SLE are at a higher risk for developing increased organ damage and complications from the disease as well as adverse events from the life-long treatments usually required.
The efficacy of Benlysta IV for the treatment of SLE in pediatric patients was studied over 52 weeks in 93 pediatric patients with SLE. The proportion of pediatric patients achieving the composite primary endpoint, the SLE response index (SRI-4), was higher in pediatric patients receiving Benlysta IV plus standard therapy compared to placebo plus standard therapy. Pediatric patients who received Benlysta IV plus standard therapy also had a lower risk of experiencing a severe flare, as well as longer duration of time until a severe flare (160 days versus 82 days). The drug’s safety and pharmacokinetic profiles in pediatric patients were consistent with those in adults with SLE.
Benlysta’s doctor and patient information includes a warning for mortality, serious infections, hypersensitivity and depression, based on data from the clinical studies in adults with SLE. The drug should not be administered with live vaccines. The manufacturer is required to provide a Medication Guide to inform patients of the risks associated with Benlysta.
The most common side effects in patients included nausea, diarrhea and fever. Patients also commonly experienced infusion reactions, so healthcare professionals are advised to pre-treat patients with an antihistamine.
The FDA granted this application a Priority Review designation. The FDA granted the approval of Benlysta to GlaxoSmithKline.
////////////Benlysta, belimumab, fda 2019, Priority Review, GlaxoSmithKline
Erdafitinib is an orally bioavailable, pan fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor with potential antineoplastic activity. Upon oral administration, erdafitinib binds to and inhibits FGFR, which may result in the inhibition of FGFR-related signal transduction pathways and thus the inhibition of tumor cell proliferation and tumor cell death in FGFR-overexpressing tumor cells. FGFR, upregulated in many tumor cell types, is a receptor tyrosine kinase essential to tumor cell proliferation, differentiation and survival
Erdafitinib has been used in trials studying the basic science and treatment of Tumor or Lymphoma.
In April 2019, erdafitinib was granted approval by the FDA for treatment of metastatic or locally advanced bladder cancer with an FGFR3 or FGFR2 alteration that has progressed beyond traditional platinum-based therapies, subject to a confirmatory trial.
US2016090633USE OF FGFR MUTANT GENE PANELS IN IDENTIFYING CANCER PATIENTS THAT WILL BE RESPONSIVE TO TREATMENT WITH AN FGFR INHIBITOR2015-09-182016-03-31
US2016287699FGFR/PD-1 COMBINATION THERAPY FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCER2016-03-24
First FDA-approved vaccine for the prevention of dengue disease in endemic regions
May 01, 2019
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced today the approval of Dengvaxia, the first vaccine approved for the prevention of dengue disease caused by all dengue virus serotypes (1, 2, 3 and 4) in people ages 9 through 16 who have laboratory-confirmed previous dengue infection and who live in endemic areas. Dengue is endemic in the U.S. territories of American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
“Dengue disease is the most common mosquito-borne viral disease in the world and global incidence has increased in recent decades,” said Anna Abram, FDA deputy commissioner for policy, legislation, and international affairs. “The FDA is committed to working proactively with our partners at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as well as international partners, including the World Health Organization, to combat public health threats, including through facilitating the development and availability of medical products to address emerging infectious diseases. While there is no cure for dengue disease, today’s approval is an important step toward helping to reduce the impact of this virus in endemic regions of the United States.”
The CDC estimates more than one-third of the world’s population is living in areas at risk for infection by dengue virus which causes dengue fever, a leading cause of illness among people living in the tropics and subtropics. The first infection with dengue virus typically results in either no symptoms or a mild illness that can be mistaken for the flu or another viral infection. A subsequent infection can lead to severe dengue, including dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF), a more severe form of the disease that can be fatal. Symptoms may include stomach pain, persistent vomiting, bleeding, confusion and difficulty breathing. Approximately 95 percent of all severe/hospitalized cases of dengue are associated with second dengue virus infection. Because there are no specific drugs approved for the treatment of dengue disease, care is limited to the management of symptoms.
Each year, an estimated 400 million dengue virus infections occur globally according to the CDC. Of these, approximately 500,000 cases develop into DHF, which contributes to about 20,000 deaths, primarily among children. Although dengue cases are rare in the continental U.S., the disease is regularly found in American Samoa, Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, as well as Latin America, Southeast Asia and the Pacific islands.
“Infection by one type of dengue virus usually provides immunity against that specific serotype, but a subsequent infection by any of the other three serotypes of the virus increases the risk of developing severe dengue disease, which may lead to hospitalization or even death,” said Peter Marks, M.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. “As the second infection with dengue is often much more severe than the first, the FDA’s approval of this vaccine will help protect people previously infected with dengue virus from subsequent development of dengue disease.”
The safety and effectiveness of the vaccine was determined in three randomized, placebo-controlled studies involving approximately 35,000 individuals in dengue-endemic areas, including Puerto Rico, Latin America and the Asia Pacific region. The vaccine was determined to be approximately 76 percent effective in preventing symptomatic, laboratory-confirmed dengue disease in individuals 9 through 16 years of age who previously had laboratory-confirmed dengue disease. Dengvaxia has already been approved in 19 countries and the European Union.
The most commonly reported side effects by those who received Dengvaxia were headache, muscle pain, joint pain, fatigue, injection site pain and low-grade fever. The frequency of side effects was similar across Dengvaxia and placebo recipients and tended to decrease after each subsequent dose of the vaccine.
Dengvaxia is not approved for use in individuals not previously infected by any dengue virus serotype or for whom this information is unknown. This is because in people who have not been infected with dengue virus, Dengvaxia appears to act like a first dengue infection – without actually infecting the person with wild-type dengue virus – such that a subsequent infection can result in severe dengue disease.Therefore, health care professionals should evaluate individuals for prior dengue infection to avoid vaccinating individuals who have not been previously infected by dengue virus. This can be assessed through a medical record of a previous laboratory-confirmed dengue infection or through serological testing (tests using blood samples from the patient) prior to vaccination.
Dengvaxia is a live, attenuated vaccine that is administered as three separate injections, with the initial dose followed by two additional shots given six and twelve months later.
The FDA granted this application Priority Review and a Tropical Disease Priority Review Voucher under a program intended to encourage development of new drugs and biologics for the prevention and treatment of certain tropical diseases. The approval was granted to Sanofi Pasteur.
VX-659
VX-659 potassium salt
VY7D8MTV72 (UNII code)
WHO 11167
3-Pyridinecarboxamide, N-(phenylsulfonyl)-6-[3-[2-[1-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]-2-[(4S)-2,2,4-trimethyl-1-pyrrolidinyl]-, potassium salt (1:1)
Bamocaftor potassium is a CFTR channel (DeltaF508-CFTR Mutant) corrector in phase II clinical trials at Vertex, in patients with CF who are homozygous for the F508del mutation of the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, or who are heterozygous for the F508del mutation and a minimal function (MF) CFTR mutation not likely to respond to tezacaftor, ivacaftor, or tezacaftor/ivacaftor and also in combination with tezacaftor and VX-561 in F508del/MF in patients with cystic fibrosis.
The compound is also developed by the company as a fixed-dose combination of VX-659, tezacaftor and ivacaftor.
Vertex Pharmaceuticals is developing a combination regimen comprising VX-659, a next-generation cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) corrector, with tezacaftor and ivacaftor, as a triple fixed-dose combination tablet. In March 2019, Vertex planned to file an NDA in the US in 3Q19 concurrently in patients aged 12 years or older with one F508del mutation and one minimal function mutation and in patients with two F508del mutations for either the VX-659 or VX-445 triple combination regimen; the regimen selected for a regulatory filing would be based on final 24-week data.
[00229] Synthetic Example 1: Synthesis of N-(benzenesulfonyl)-6-[3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]pyrazol-l-yl]-2-[(4S)-2,2,4-trimethylpyrrolidin-l-yl]pyridine-3-carboxamide (Compound 1)
[00230] Part A: Synthesis of (4S)-2,2,4-trimethylpyrrolidine hydrochloride
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
[00231] Step 1: Synthesis of methyl-2,4-dimethyl-4-nitro-pentanoate
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
[00232] Tetrahydrofuran (THF, 4.5 L) was added to a 20 L glass reactor and stirred under N2 at room temperature. 2-Nitropropane (1.5 kg. 16.83 mol) and 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) (1.282 kg, 8.42 mol) were then charged to the reactor, and the jacket temperature was increased to 50 °C. Once the reactor contents were close to 50 °C, methyl methacrylate (1.854 kg, 18.52 mol) was added slowly over 100 minutes. The reaction temperature was maintained at or close to 50 °C for 21 hours. The reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo then transferred back to the reactor and diluted with methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) (14 L). 2 M HC1 (7.5 L) was added, and this mixture was stirred for 5 minutes then allowed to settle. Two clear layers were visible – a lower yellow aqueous phase and an upper green organic phase. The aqueous layer was removed, and the organic layer was stirred again with 2 M HC1 (3 L). After separation, the HC1 washes were recombined and stirred with MTBE (3 L) for 5 minutes. The aqueous layer was removed, and all of the organic layers were combined in the reactor and stirred with water (3 L) for 5 minutes. After separation, the organic layers were concentrated in vacuo to afford a cloudy green oil. This was dried with MgSC and filtered to afford methyl-2,4-dimethyl-4-mtro-pentanoate as a clear green oil (3.16 kg, 99% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 3.68 (s, 3H), 2.56 – 2.35 (m, 2H), 2.11 – 2.00 (m, 1H), 1.57 (s, 3H), 1.55 (s, 3H), 1.19 (d, J= 6.8 Hz, 3H). [00233] Step 2: Synthesis of methyl (2S)-2,4-dimethyl-4-nitro-pentanoate
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
[00234] A reactor was charged with purified water (2090 L; 10 vol) and then potassium phosphate monobasic (27 kg, 198.4 moles; 13 g/L for water charge). The pH of the reactor contents was adjusted to pH 6.5 (± 0.2) with 20% (w/v) potassium carbonate solution. The reactor was charged with racemic methyl-2,4-dimethyl-4-nitro-pentanoate (209 kg; 1104.6 moles), and Palatase 20000L lipase (13 L, 15.8 kg; 0.06 vol).
[00235] The reaction mixture was adjusted to 32 ± 2 °C and stirred for 15-21 hours, and pH 6.5 was maintained using a pH stat with the automatic addition of 20% potassium carbonate solution. When the racemic starting material was converted to >98% ee of the S-enantiomer, as determined by chiral GC, external heating was switched off. The reactor was then charged with MTBE (35 L; 5 vol), and the aqueous layer was extracted with MTBE (3 times, 400-1000L). The combined organic extracts were washed with aqueous Na2CO3 (4 times, 522 L, 18 % w/w 2.5 vol), water (523 L; 2.5 vol), and 10% aqueous NaCl (314 L, 1.5 vol). The organic layer was concentrated in vacuo to afford methyl (2S)-2,4-dimethyl-4-nitro-pentanoate as a mobile yellow oil (>98% ee, 94.4 kg; 45 % yield).
[00236] Step 3: Synthesis of (3S)-3,5,5-trimethylpyrrolidin-2-one
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
[00237] A 20 L reactor was purged with N2. The vessel was charged sequentially with DI water-rinsed, damp Raney® Ni (2800 grade, 250 g), methyl (2S)-2,4-dimethyl-4-nitro-pentanoate (1741g, 9.2 mol), and ethanol (13.9 L, 8 vol). The reaction was stirred at 900 rpm, and the reactor was flushed with H2 and maintained at -2.5 bar. The reaction mixture was then warmed to 60 °C for 5 hours. The reaction mixture was cooled and filtered to remove Raney nickel, and the solid cake was rinsed with ethanol (3.5 L, 2 vol). The ethanolic solution of the product was combined with a second equal sized batch and concentrated in vacuo to reduce to a minimum volume of ethanol (-1.5 volumes). Heptane (2.5 L) was added, and the suspension was concentrated again to -1.5 volumes. This was repeated 3 times; the resulting suspension was cooled to 0-5 °C, filtered under suction, and washed with heptane (2.5 L). The product was dried under vacuum for 20 minutes then transferred to drying trays and dried in a vacuum oven at 40 °C overnight to afford (3S)-3,5,5-trimethylpyrrolidin-2-one as a white crystalline solid (2.042 kg, 16.1 mol, 87 %). 1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 6.39 (s, 1H), 2.62 (ddq, J = 9.9, 8.6, 7.1 Hz, 1H), 2.17 (dd, J = 12.4, 8.6 Hz, 1H), 1.56 (dd, J = 12.5, 9.9 Hz, 1H), 1.31 (s, 3H), 1.25 (s, 3H), 1.20 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H).
[00238] Step 4: Synthesis of (4S)-2,2,4-trimethylpyrrolidine hydrochloride
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
[00239] A glass lined 120 L reactor was charged with lithium aluminium hydride pellets (2.5 kg, 66 mol) and dry THF (60 L) and warmed to 30 °C. The resulting suspension was charged with (S)-3,5,5-trimethylpyrrolidin-2-one (7.0 kg, 54 mol) in THF (25 L) over 2 hours while maintaining the reaction temperature at 30 to 40 °C. After complete addition, the reaction temperature was increased to 60 – 63 °C and maintained overnight. The reaction mixture was cooled to 22 °C, then cautiously quenched with the addition of ethyl acetate (EtOAc) (1.0 L, 10 moles), followed by a mixture of THF (3.4 L) and water (2.5 kg, 2.0 eq), and then a mixture of water (1.75 kg) with 50 % aqueous sodium hydroxide (750 g, 2 equiv water with 1.4 equiv sodium hydroxide relative to aluminum), followed by 7.5 L water. After the addition was complete, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, and the solid was removed by filtration and washed with THF (3 x 25 L). The filtrate and washings were combined and treated with 5.0 L (58 moles) of aqueous 37% HCl (1.05 equiv.) while maintaining the temperature below 30°C. The resultant solution was concentrated by vacuum distillation to a slurry. Isopropanol (8 L) was added and the solution was concentrated to near dryness by vacuum distillation. Isopropanol (4 L) was added, and 1he product was slurried by warming to about 50 °C. MTBE (6 L) was added, and the
slurry was cooled to 2-5 °C. The product was collected by filtration and rinsed with 12 L MTBE and dried in a vacuum oven (55 °C/300 torr/N2 bleed) to afford (4S)-2,2,4- trimethylpyrrolidine’HCl as a white, crystalline solid (6.21 kg, 75% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.34 (br d, 2H), 3.33 (dd, J = 11.4, 8.4 Hz, 1H), 2.75 (dd, / = 11.4, 8.6 Hz, 1H), 2.50 – 2.39 (m, 1H), 1.97 (dd, J= 12.7, 7.7 Hz, 1H), 1.42 (s, 3H), 1.38 (dd, J = 12.8, 10.1 Hz, 1H), 1.31 (s, 3H), 1.05 (d, J= 6.6 Hz, 3H).
[00240] Part B: Synthesis of N-(benzenesulfonyl)-6-[3-[2-[l- (trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]pyrazol-l-yl]-2-[(4S)-2,2,4- trimethylpyrrolidin-l-yl]pyridine-3-carboxamide
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
[00241] Synthesis of starting materials:
[00242] Synthesis of tert-Butyl 2,6-dichloropyridine-3-carboxylate
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
[00243] A solution of 2,6-dichloropyridine-3-carboxylic acid (10 g, 52.08 mmol) in THF (210 mL) was treated successively with di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (17 g, 77.89 mmol) and 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine (3.2 g, 26.19 mmol) and stirred overnight at room temperature. At this point, HC1 IN (400 mL) was added, and the mixture was stirred vigorously for about 10 minutes. The product was extracted with ethyl acetate (2x300mL), and the combined organic layers were washed with water (300 mL) and brine (150 mL) and dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure to give 12.94 g (96% yield) of tert- butyl 2,6-dichloropyndine-3-carboxylate as a colorless oil. ESI-MS m/z calc. 247.02, found 248.1 (M+l) +; Retention time: 2.27 minutes. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDC13) ppm 1.60 (s, 9H), 7.30 (d, .7=7.9 Hz, 1H), 8.05 (d, J=8.2 Hz, 1H).
[00244] Synthesis of tert-Butyl 3-oxo-2,3-dihydro-lH-pyrazole-l-carboxylate
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
[00245] A 50L reactor was started, and the jacket was set to 20 °C, with stirring at 150 rpm, reflux condenser (10 °C) and nitrogen purge. MeOH (2.860 L) and methyl (E)-3-methoxyprop-2-enoate (2.643 kg, 22.76 mol) were added, and the reactor was capped. The reaction was heated to an internal temperature of 40 °C, and the system was set to hold jacket temperature at 40 °C. Hydrazine hydrate (1300 g of 55 %w/w, 22.31 mol) was added portion wise via addition funnel over 30 min. The reaction was heated to 60 °C for 1 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to 20 °C and triethyamine (2.483 kg, 3.420 L, 24.54 mol) was added portion-wise, maintaining reaction temperature <30 °C. A solution of Boc anhydride (di-tert-butyl dicarbonate) (4.967 kg, 5.228 L. 22.76 mol) in MeOH (2.860 L) was added portion-wise maintaining temperature <45 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred at 20 °C for 16 h. The reaction solution was partially concentrated to remove MeOH, resulting in a clear, light amber oil. The resulting oil was transferred to the 50L reactor, stirred and water (7.150 L) and heptane (7.150 L) were added. The additions caused a small amount of the product to precipitate. The aqueous layer was drained into a clean container, and the interface and heptane layer were filtered to separate the solid (product). The aqueous layer was transferred back to the reactor, and the collected solid was placed back into the reactor and mixed with the aqueous layer. A dropping funnel was added to the reactor and loaded with acetic acid (1.474 kg, 1.396 L, 24.54 mol) and added dropwise. The jacket was set to 0 °C to absorb the quench exotherm. After the addition was complete (pH=5), the reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h. The solid was collected by filtration and washed with water (7.150 L), and washed a second time with water (3.575 L). The crystalline solid was transferred into a 20L rotovap bulb, and heptane (7.150 L) was added. The mixture was slurried at 45 °C for 30 mins, and 1-2 volumes of solvent were distilled off The slurry in the rotovap flask was filtered, and the solids were washed with heptane (3.575 L). The solid was further dried in vacuo (50 °C, 15 mbar) to give tert-butyl 5-oxo-lH-pyrazole-2-carboxylate (2921 g, 71%) as a coarse, crystalline solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.95 (s, 1H), 7.98 (d, J= 2.9 Hz, 1H), 5.90 (d, J= 2.9 Hz, 1H), 1.54 (s, 9H).
[00246] Synthesis of 2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethanol
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
[00247] To a solution of lithium aluminum hydride (293 mg, 7.732 mmol) in THF (10.00 mL) in an ice-bath, 2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]acetic acid (1.002 g, 5.948 mmol) in THF (3.0 mL) was added dropwise over a period of 30 minutes keeping the reaction temperature below 20 ° C. The mixture was allowed to gradually warm to ambient temperature and was stirred for 18 h. The mixture was cooled with an ice-bath and sequentially quenched with water (294 mg, 295 μL, 16.36 mmol), NaOH (297 μL of 6 M, 1.784 mmol), and then water (884.0 μL, 49.07 mmol) to afford a granular solid in the mixture. The solid was filtered off using celite, and the precipitate was washed with ether. The filtrate was further dried with MgSO4 and filtered and concentrated in vacuo to afford the product with residual THF and ether. The mixture was taken directly into the next step without further purification.
[00249] rerf-Butyl 5-oxo-lH-pyrazole-2-carboxylate (1.043 g, 5.660 mmol), 2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethanol (916 mg, 5.943 mmol), and triphenyl phosphine (1.637 g, 6.243 mmol) were combined in THF (10.48 mL) and the reaction was cooled in an ice-bath. Diisopropyl azodicarboxylate (1.288 g, 1.254 mL, 6.368 mmol) was added dropwise to the reaction mixture, and the reaction was allowed to warm to room temperature for 16 hours. The mixture was evaporated, and the resulting material was partitioned between ethyl acetate (30 mL) and IN sodium hydroxide (30 mL). The organic layer was separated, washed with brine (30 mL), dried over sodium sulfate, and concentrated. The crude material was purified by silica gel chromatography eluting with a gradient of ethyl acetate in hexanes (0- 30%) to give tert-butyl 3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]pyrazole-l-carboxylate (1.03 g, 57%). ESI-MS m/z calc. 320.13, found 321.1 (M+l) +; Retention time: 0.72 minutes.
[00251] terr-Butyl-3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]pyrazole-l-carboxylate (1.03 g, 3.216 mmol) was dissolved in dichloromethane (10.30 mL) with trifluoroacetic acid (2.478 mL, 32.16 mmol), and the reaction was stirred at room temperature for 2 hours. The reaction was evaporated, and the resulting oil was partitioned between ethyl acetate (10 mL) and a saturated sodium bicarbonate solution.
The organic layer was separated, washed with brine, dried over sodium sulfate, and evaporated to give 3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]-lH-pyrazole (612 mg, 86%). ESI-MS m/z calc. 220.08, found 221.0 (M+1) +; Retention time: 0.5 minutes. ¾ NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.86 (s, 1H), 7.50 (t, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 5.63 (t, J= 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.14 (t, J= 7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.01 (t, J= 7.1 Hz, 2H), 0.96 – 0.88 (m, 2H), 0.88 -0.81 (m, 2H).
[00253] tert-Butyl 2,6-dichloropyridine-3-carboxylate (687 mg, 2.770 mmol), 3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]-lH-pyrazole (610 mg, 2.770 mmol), and freshly ground potassium carbonate (459 mg, 3.324 mmol) were combined in anhydrous DMSO (13.75 mL). l,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO (1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane), 62 mg, 0.5540 mmol) was added, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature under nitrogen for 16 hours. The reaction mixture was diluted with water (20 mL) and stirred for 15 minutes. The resulting solid was collected and washed with water. The solid was dissolved in dichloromethane and dried over magnesium sulfate. The mixture was filtered and concentrated to give ferf-butyl 2-chloro-6-[3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]pyrazol-l-yl]pyridine-3-carboxylate (1.01 g, 84%). ESI-MS m/z calc. 431.12, found 432.1 (M+1) +; Retention time: 0.88 minutes.
[00255] tert-Butyl 2-chloro-6-[3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]pyrazol-l-yl]pyridine-3-carboxylate (1.01 g, 2.339 mmol) and trifluoroacetic acid (1.8 mL, 23.39 mmol) were combined in dichloromethane (10 mL) and heated at 40 °C for 3 h. The reaction was concentrated. Hexanes were added, and the mixture was concentrated again to give 2-chloro-6-[3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]pyrazol-l-yl]pyridine-3-carboxylic acid (873 mg, 99%) ESI-MS m/z calc. 375.06, found 376.1 (M+l)+; Retention time: 0.69 minutes.
[00257] A solution of 2-chloro-6-[3-[2-[l- (trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]pyrazol-l-yl]pyridine-3-carboxylic acid (0.15 g, 0.3992 mmol) and carbonyl diimidazole (77 mg, 0,4790 mmol) in THF (2.0 mL) was stirred for one hour, and benzenesulfonamide (81 mg, 0.5190 mmol) and DBU (72 μL, 0.4790 mmol) were added. The reaction was stirred for 16 hours, acidified with 1 M aqueous citric acid, and extracted with ethyl acetate. The combined extracts were dried over sodium sulfate and evaporated. The residue was purified by silica gel chromatography eluting with a gradient of methanol in dichloromethane (0-5%) to give N-(benzenesulfonyl)-2-chloro-6-[3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]pyrazol-l-yl]pyndine-3-carboxamide (160 mg, 78%). ESI-MS m/z calc. 514.07, found 515.1 (M+l)+; Retention time: 0.74 minutes.
[00264] A mixture of EtOH (20.00 L, 10 vol) and diethyl 2-(ethoxymethylene)propanedioate (2000 g, 9.249 mol, 1.0 equiv) was added under nitrogen purge a to a 50 L reactor equipped with a reflux condenser (10 °C) and the jacket set to 40 °C. The mixture was stirred, and then hydrazine hydrate (538.9 g of 55 %w/w, 523.7 mL of 55 %w/w, 9.249 mol, 1.00 equiv) was added in portions via an addition funnel. Once the addition was complete, the reaction was heated to 75 °C for 22 h to afford a solution of ethy l 3-hydroxy-lH-pyrazole-4-carboxylate that was used directly in the next step.
[00266] The solution of ethyl 3-hydroxy-lH-pyrazole-4-carboxylate was cooled from 75 °C to 40 °C, then triethylamine (TEA) (46.80 g, 64.46 mL, 462.5 mmol, 0.05 eq.) was added. A solution of Boc anhydride (2.119 kg, 9.711 mol 1.05 equiv) in EtOH (2.000 L, 1 equiv) was added to the reactor over 35 min. The mixture was stirred for 4 hours to complete the reaction; then water (10.00 L, 5.0 vol) was added over 15 mins. The resulting mixture was cooled to 20 °C to complete crystallization of the product. The crystals were allowed to age for 1 hour, then the mixture was filtered. The solid was washed with a mixture of EtOH (4.000 L, 2.0 vol) and water (2.000 L, 1 0 vol) The solid was then dried in vacuo to afford l-(tert-butyl)-4-ethyl-3-hydroxy-lH-pyrazole-1,4-dicarboxylate (1530 g, 65%) as colorless, fine needle, crystalline solid. ‘H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.61 (s, 1H), 8.40 (s, 1H), 4.20 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.56 (s, 9H), 1.25 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H).
[00268] A 5L reactor was started with the jacket set to 40 °C, stirring at 450 rpm, reflux condenser at room temperature and nitrogen purge. The vessel was charged with toluene (1.0L, 10.0 vol), 2-[l-(tnfluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethanol (lOO.Og, 648.8 mmol, 1.0 equiv), and l-(tert-butyl) 4-ethyl 3-hydroxy-lH-pyrazole-l,4-dicarboxylate (166.3 g, 648.8 mmol), and the mixture was stirred. The reaction mixture was charged with triphenyl phosphine (195.7 g, 746.1 mmol, 1.15 equiv), then the reactor was set to maintain an internal temperature of 40 °C. Diisopropyl azoldicarboxylate (150.9 g, 746.1 mmol, 1.15 equiv) was added into an addition funnel and was added to the
reaction while maintaining the reaction temperature between 40 and 50 °C (addition was exothermic, exotherm addition controlled), and stirred for a total of 2.5 hours. Once the reaction was deemed complete by HPLC, heptane was added (400 mL, 4 vol), the solution was cooled to 20 °C over 60 minutes, and the bulk of tnphenylphosphine oxide-DIAD complex (TPPO-DIAD) crystallized out. Once at room temp, the mixture was filtered, and the solid was washed with heptane (400 mL, 4.0 vol) and pulled dry. The filtrate was used in the next step as a solution in toluene-heptane without further purification.
[00270] A 500mL reactor was started with the jacket set to 40 °C, stirring at 450 rpm, reflux condenser at room temp, and nitrogen purge. The vessel was charged with a toluene solution consisting of approximately 160 mmol, 65.0 g of 1 -(tert-buty 1) 4-ethyl 3-(2-(l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl)ethoxy)-lH-pyrazole-l,4-dicarboxylate in 3 vol of toluene (prepared by concentrating a 25% portion of filtrate from previous reaction down to 4 volumes in a rotovap). The reaction was set to maintain an internal temperature at 40 °C and KOH (33.1 g, 1.5 eq. of aqueous 45 % KOH solution) was added in one portion, resulting in a mild exothermic addition, while CO2 was generated upon removal of the protecting group. The reaction proceeded for 1.5 hr, monitored by HPLC, with the product partially crystallizing during the reaction. Heptane (160 mL, 2.5 vol) was added to the reaction mixture and the reaction was cooled to room temperature over 30 minutes. The resulting mixture was filtered, and the solid was washed with heptane (80.00 mL, 1.25 vol), pulled dry, then dried in vacuo (55 °C, vacuum). 52.3 g of ethyl 3-(2-(l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl)ethoxy)-lH-pyrazole-4-carboxylate was obtained as a crude, colorless solid that was used without further purification.
[00272] A 500mL reactor was started with the jacket set to 40 °C, stirring at 450 rpm, reflux condenser at room temp, and nitrogen purge. The vessel was charged with methanol (150.0 mL, 3.0 vol), a solution of ethyl 3-(2-(l-(triiluoromethyl)cyclopropyl)ethoxy)-lH-pyrazole-4-carboxylate (50.0 g, 171.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv), and the reaction was stirred to suspend the solids. The reactor was set to maintain internal temperature at 40 °C. To the mixture was added KOH (96 g of aqueous 45 % KOH, 1.71 mol, 10.0 equiv) in portions maintaining the internal temperature <50 °C. Once addition was complete, the reaction was set to maintain temperature at 50 °C, and the reaction proceeded for 23 hours, monitored by HPLC. Once complete the reaction was cooled to 10 °C then partially concentrated on a rotary evaporator to remove most of the MeOH. The resulting solution was diluted with water (250 mL, 5.0 vol) and 2-Me-THF (150 mL, 3.0 vol), and transferred to the reactor, stirred at room temp, then stopped, and layers were allowed to separate. The layers were tested, with remaining TPPO-DIAD complex in the organic layer and product in the aqueous layer. The aqueous layer was washed again with 2-Me-THF (100 mL, 2.0 vol), the layers separated, and the aqueous layer returned to the reactor vessel. The stirrer was started and set to 450 rpm, and the reactor jacket was set to 0 °C. The pH was adjusted to pH acidic by addition of 6M aqueous HC1 (427mL, 15 equiv) portion wise, maintaining the internal temperature between 10 and 30 °C. The product began to crystallize close to pH neutral and was accompanied with strong off-gassing, and so the acid was added slowly, and then further added to reach pH 1 once the off-gassing had ended. To the resulting suspension was added 2-Me-THF (400 mL, 8.0 vol), and the product was allowed to dissolve into the organic layer. Stirring was stopped, the layers were separated, and the aqueous layer was returned to the reactor, stirred and re-extracted with 2-Me-THF (100 mL, 2.0 vol). The organic lay ers were combined in the reactor and stirred at room temperature, washed with brine (lOOmL, 2 vols), dried over Na2S04, filtered through celite, and the solid was washed with 2-Me-THF (50 mL, 1.0 vol). The filtrate was transferred to a clean rotovap flask, stirred, warmed to 50 °C and heptane (200 mL, 4.0 vol) added, and then partially concentrated with the addition of heptane (300 mL, 6.0 vol) and then seeded with 50mg of 3-(2-(l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl)ethoxy)-lH-pyrazole-4-carboxylic acid), and the product crystallized during solvent removal. The distillation was stopped when the bulk of the 2-Me-THF had distilled off. The bath heater was turned off, the vacuum removed, and the mixture was allowed to stir and cool to room temperature. The mixture was filtered (slow speed) and the solid was washed with heptane (100 mL, 2.0 vol), and the solid was collected and dried in vacuo (50 °C, rotovap). 22.47 g of 3-(2-(l-(triiluoromethyl)cyclopropyl)ethoxy)-lH-pyrazole-4-carboxylic acid was obtained as an off-white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d) δ 12.45 (s, 2H), 8.01 (s, 1H), 4.26 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 2.05 (t, J= 7.0 Hz, 2H), 0.92 (m, 4H).
[00274] A mixture of toluene (490.0 mL), 3-(2-(l- (triiluoromethyl)cyclopropyl)ethoxy)-lH-pyrazole-4-carboxylic acid (70.0 g, 264.9 mmol), and DMSO (70.00 mL) was placed in a reactor and heated to 100 °C with stirring. DBU (approximately 20.16 g, 19.80 mL, 132.4 mmol) was added to the reactor over 15 min. The mixture was stirred for 20 h to complete the reaction and then cooled to 20 °C. The mixture was washed with water (350.0 mL), then 0.5N aq HC1 (280.0 mL), then water (2 x 140.0 mL), and lastly with bnne (210.0 mL). The organic layer was dried with Na2S04, and then activated charcoal (5 g, Darco 100 mesh) was added to the stirred slurry. The dried mixture was filtered through celite, and the solid was washed with toluene (140.0 mL) and then pulled dry. The filtrate was concentrated in a rotovap (50 °C, vac) to afford 3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]-lH-
[00276] A mixture of DMF (180.0 mL), ethyl 2,6-dichloropyridine-3-carboxylate (approximately 29.97 g, 136.2 mmol), 3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]-lH-pyrazole (30.0 g, 136.2 mmol), and K2CO3, (325 mesh, approximately 24.48 g, 177.1 mmol) was added to a stirred reactor at 20 °C. DABCO (approximately 2.292 g, 20.43 mmol) was then added to the reactor, and the mixture was stirred at 20 °C for 1 hour, and then the temperature was increased to 30 °C, and the mixture stirred for 24 hours to complete the reaction. The mixture was cooled to 20 °C; then water (360 mL) was added slowly. The mixture was then drained from the reactor and the solid was isolated by filtration. The solid was then washed with water (2 x 150 mL), and then the solid was dried under vacuum at 55 °C to afford ethyl 2-chloro-6-[3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]pyrazol-l-yl]pyridine-3-carboxylate (51.37 g, 93%) as a fine, beige colored solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-c4) δ 8.44 (d, J= 2.9 Hz, 1H), 8.41 (d, J= 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (d, J= 8.5 Hz, 1H), 6.21 (d, J= 2.9 Hz, 1H), 4.34 (m, 4H), 2.09 (t, J= 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.34 (t, J= 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.00 – 0.84 (m, 4H).
[00278] A solution of ethyl 2-chloro-6-[3-[2-[l- (trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]pyrazol-l-yl]pyridine-3-carboxylate (50.0 g, 123.8 mmol) in THF (300.0 mL) was prepared in a reactor at 20 °C. EtOH (150.0 mL) was added, followed by aqueous NaOH (approximately 59.44 g of 10 %w/w, 148.6 mmol). The mixture was stirred for 1 hour to complete the reaction; then aq IN HCl (750.0 mL) was slowly added. The resulting suspension was stirred for 30 mm at 10 °C, and then the solid was isolated by filtration. The solid was washed with water (150 mL then 2 x 100 mL) and then pulled dry by vacuum. The solid was then further dried under vacuum with heating to afford 2-chloro-6-[3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]pyrazol-l-yl]pyridine-3-carboxylic acid (42.29 g, 91%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d 6) 5 13.63 (s, 1H), 8.48 – 8.35 (m, 2H), 7.73 (d, J= 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.20 (d, J= 2.9 Hz, 1H), 4.35 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.09 (t, J= 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.01 – 0.82 (m, 4H).
PATENT
WO2018227049
Follows on from WO2018227049 , claiming a composition comprising this compound and at least one of tezacaftor, ivacaftor, deutivacaftor or lumacaftor, useful for treating CF.
Novel crystalline forms of the compound, the potassium salt of which is presumed to be VX-659 , Such as Forms A, B, C, D, E, H and M , processes for their preparation and compositions comprising them are claimed. Also claimed are their use for treating cystic fibrosis, and compositions comprising VX-659, ivacaftoR, lumacaftor and tezacaftor .
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No.
62/574,677, filed October 19, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/574,670, filed October 19, 2017; and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/650,057, filed March 29, 2018, the entire contents of each of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference in their respective entireties.
[0002] Disclosed herein are crystalline forms of Compound I and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof, which are modulators of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR), compositions comprising the same, methods of using the same, and processes for making the same.
[0003] Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a recessive genetic disease that affects approximately 70,000 children and adults worldwide. Despite progress in the treatment of CF, there is no cure.
[0004] In patients with CF, mutations in CFTR endogenously expressed in respiratory epithelia lead to reduced apical anion secretion causing an imbalance in ion and fluid transport. The resulting decrease in anion transport contributes to enhanced mucus accumulation in the lung and accompanying microbial infections that ultimately cause death in CF patients. In addition to respiratory disease, CF patients typically suffer from gastrointestinal problems and pancreatic insufficiency that, if left untreated, result in death. In addition, the majority of males with cystic fibrosis are infertile, and fertility is reduced among females with cystic fibrosis.
[0005] Sequence analysis of the CFTR gene has revealed a variety of disease-causing mutations (Cutting, G. R. et al. (1990) Nature 346:366-369; Dean, M. et al. (1990) Cell 61 :863 :870; and Kerem, B-S. et al. (1989) Science 245: 1073-1080; Kerem, B-S et al. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:8447-8451). To date, greater than 2000 mutations in the CF gene have been identified; currently, the CFTR2 database contains information on only 322 of these identified mutations, with sufficient evidence to define 281 mutations as disease causing. The most prevalent disease-causing mutation is a deletion of phenylalanine at position 508 of the CFTR amino acid sequence and is
commonly referred to as the F508del mutation. This mutation occurs in approximately 70% of the cases of cystic fibrosis and is associated with severe disease.
[0006] The deletion of residue 508 in CFTR prevents the nascent protein from folding correctly. This results in the inability of the mutant protein to exit the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and traffic to the plasma membrane. As a result, the number of CFTR channels for anion transport present in the membrane is far less than observed in cells expressing wild-type CFTR, i.e., CFTR having no mutations. In addition to impaired trafficking, the mutation results in defective channel gating.
Together, the reduced number of channels in the membrane and the defective gating lead to reduced anion and fluid transport across epithelia. (Quinton, P. M. (1990), FASEB J. 4: 2709-2727). The channels that are defective because of the F508del mutation are still functional, albeit less functional than wild-type CFTR channels. (Dalemans et al. (1991), Nature Lond. 354: 526-528; Pasyk and Foskett (1995), J. Cell. Biochem. 270: 12347-50). In addition to F508del, other disease-causing mutations in CFTR that result in defective trafficking, synthesis, and/or channel gating could be up-or down-regulated to alter anion secretion and modify disease progression and/or severity.
[0007] CFTR is a cAMP/ATP-mediated anion channel that is expressed in a variety of cell types, including absorptive and secretory epithelia cells, where it regulates anion flux across the membrane, as well as the activity of other ion channels and proteins. In epithelial cells, normal functioning of CFTR is critical for the maintenance of electrolyte transport throughout the body, including respiratory and digestive tissue. CFTR is composed of approximately 1480 amino acids that encode a protein which is made up of a tandem repeat of transmembrane domains, each containing six
transmembrane helices and a nucleotide binding domain. The two transmembrane domains are linked by a large, polar, regulatory (R)-domain with multiple
phosphorylation sites that regulate channel activity and cellular trafficking.
[0008] Chloride transport takes place by the coordinated activity of ENaC and CFTR present on the apical membrane and the Na+-K+-ATPase pump and CI- channels expressed on the basolateral surface of the cell. Secondary active transport of chloride from the luminal side leads to the accumulation of intracellular chloride, which can then passively leave the cell via CI“ channels, resulting in a vectorial transport. Arrangement of Na+/2C17K+ co-transporter, Na+-K+– ATPase pump and the basolateral membrane K+ channels on the basolateral surface and CFTR on the luminal side coordinate the secretion of chloride via CFTR on the luminal side. Because water is probably never actively transported itself, its flow across epithelia depends on tiny transepithelial osmotic gradients generated by the bulk flow of sodium and chloride.
[0009] Compound I and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof are potent CFTR modulators. Compound I is N-(benzenesulfonyl)-6-[3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl) cyclopropyl]ethoxy]pyrazol-l-yl]-2-[(4S)-2,2,4-trimethylpyrrolidin-l-yl]pyridine-3-carboxamide, and has the following structure:
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Example 1: Synthesis of N-(benzenesulfonyl)-6-[3-[2-[l- (trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl] ethoxy] pyrazol-l-yl]-2- [(4S)-2,2,4- trimethylpyrrolidin-l-yl]pyridine-3-carboxamide (Compound I)
Part A: Synthesis of (4S)-2,2,4-trimethylpyrrolidine hydrochloride
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
° THF, Base
N021 “* N02 | -k/ B) HC‘
Step 1: Synthesis of methyl-2,4-dimethyl-4-nitro-pentanoate
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
[00381] Tetrahydrofuran (THF, 4.5 L) was added to a 20 L glass reactor and stirred under N2 at room temperature. 2-Nitropropane (1.5 kg, 16.83 mol) and 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) (1.282 kg, 8.42 mol) were then charged to the reactor, and the jacket temperature was increased to 50 °C. Once the reactor contents were close to 50 °C, methyl methacrylate (1.854 kg, 18.52 mol) was added slowly over 100 minutes. The reaction temperature was maintained at or close to 50 °C for 21 hours. The reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo then transferred back to the reactor and diluted with methyl fert-butyl ether (MTBE) (14 L). 2 M HC1 (7.5 L) was added, and this mixture was stirred for 5 minutes then allowed to settle. Two clear layers were visible – a lower yellow aqueous phase and an upper green organic phase. The aqueous layer was removed, and the organic layer was stirred again with 2 M HC1 (3 L). After separation, the HC1 washes were recombined and stirred with MTBE (3 L) for 5 minutes. The aqueous layer was removed, and all of the organic layers were combined in the reactor and stirred with water (3 L) for 5 minutes. After separation, the organic layers were concentrated in vacuo to afford a cloudy green oil. This was dried with MgS04 and filtered to afford methyl-2,4-dimethyl-4-nitro-pentanoate as a clear green oil (3.16 kg, 99% yield). ¾ MR (400 MHz, Chloroform-i ) δ 3.68 (s, 3H), 2.56 – 2.35 (m, 2H), 2.11 – 2.00 (m, 1H), 1.57 (s, 3H), 1.55 (s, 3H), 1.19 (d, J= 6.8 Hz, 3H).
Step 2: Synthesis of methyl (2S)-2,4-dimethyl-4-nitro-pentanoate
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
[00382] A reactor was charged with purified water (2090 L; 10 vol) and then potassium phosphate monobasic (27 kg, 198.4 moles; 13 g/L for water charge). The pH of the reactor contents was adjusted to pH 6.5 (± 0.2) with 20% (w/v) potassium carbonate solution. The reactor was charged with racemic methyl-2,4-dimethyl-4-nitro-pentanoate (209 kg; 1104.6 moles), and Palatase 20000L lipase (13 L, 15.8 kg; 0.06 vol).
[00383] The reaction mixture was adjusted to 32 ± 2 °C and stirred for 15-21 hours, and pH 6.5 was maintained using a pH stat with the automatic addition of 20% potassium carbonate solution. When the racemic starting material was converted to >98% ee of the S-enantiomer, as determined by chiral GC, external heating was
switched off. The reactor was then charged with MTBE (35 L; 5 vol), and the aqueous layer was extracted with MTBE (3 times, 400-1000L). The combined organic extracts were washed with aqueous Na2CCb (4 times, 522 L, 18 % w/w 2.5 vol), water (523 L; 2.5 vol), and 10% aqueous NaCl (314 L, 1.5 vol). The organic layer was concentrated in vacuo to afford methyl (2,S)-2,4-dimethyl-4-nitro-pentanoate as a mobile yellow oil (>98% ee, 94.4 kg; 45 % yield).
Step 3: Synthesis of (3S)-3,5,5-trimethylpyrrolidin-2-one
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
[00384] A 20 L reactor was purged with N2. The vessel was charged sequentially with DI water-rinsed, damp Raney® Ni (2800 grade, 250 g), methyl (2S)-2,4-dimethyl-4-nitro-pentanoate (1741g, 9.2 mol), and ethanol (13.9 L, 8 vol). The reaction was stirred at 900 rpm, and the reactor was flushed with H2 and maintained at -2.5 bar. The reaction mixture was then warmed to 60 °C for 5 hours. The reaction mixture was cooled and filtered to remove Raney nickel, and the solid cake was rinsed with ethanol (3.5 L, 2 vol). The ethanolic solution of the product was combined with a second equal sized batch and concentrated in vacuo to reduce to a minimum volume of ethanol (-1.5 volumes). Heptane (2.5 L) was added, and the suspension was concentrated again to -1.5 volumes. This was repeated 3 times; the resulting suspension was cooled to 0-5 °C, filtered under suction, and washed with heptane (2.5 L). The product was dried under vacuum for 20 minutes then transferred to drying trays and dried in a vacuum oven at 40 °C overnight to afford (3S)-3,5,5-trimethylpyrrolidin-2-one as a white crystalline solid (2.042 kg, 16.1 mol, 87 %). ¾ MR (400 MHz, Chloroform-i ) δ 6.39 (s, 1H), 2.62 (ddq, J = 9.9, 8.6, 7.1 Hz, 1H), 2.17 (dd, J = 12.4, 8.6 Hz, 1H), 1.56 (dd, J = 12.5, 9.9 Hz, 1H), 1.31 (s, 3H), 1.25 (s, 3H), 1.20 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H).
Step 4: Synthesis of (4S)-2,2,4-trimethylpyrrolidine hydrochloride
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
[00385] A glass lined 120 L reactor was charged with lithium aluminium hydride pellets (2.5 kg, 66 mol) and dry THF (60 L) and warmed to 30 °C. The resulting suspension was charged with (¾)-3,5,5-trimethylpyrrolidin-2-one (7.0 kg, 54 mol) in THF (25 L) over 2 hours while maintaining the reaction temperature at 30 to 40 °C. After complete addition, the reaction temperature was increased to 60 – 63 °C and maintained overnight. The reaction mixture was cooled to 22 °C, then cautiously quenched with the addition of ethyl acetate (EtOAc) (1.0 L, 10 moles), followed by a mixture of THF (3.4 L) and water (2.5 kg, 2.0 eq), and then a mixture of water (1.75 kg) with 50 % aqueous sodium hydroxide (750 g, 2 equiv water with 1.4 equiv sodium hydroxide relative to aluminum), followed by 7.5 L water. After the addition was complete, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, and the solid was removed by filtration and washed with THF (3 x 25 L). The filtrate and washings were combined and treated with 5.0 L (58 moles) of aqueous 37% HC1 (1.05 equiv.) while maintaining the temperature below 30°C. The resultant solution was concentrated by vacuum distillation to a slurry. Isopropanol (8 L) was added and the solution was concentrated to near dryness by vacuum distillation. Isopropanol (4 L) was added, and the product was slurried by warming to about 50 °C. MTBE (6 L) was added, and the slurry was cooled to 2-5 °C. The product was collected by filtration and rinsed with 12 L MTBE and dried in a vacuum oven (55 °C/300 torr/N2 bleed) to afford (4S)-2,2,4-trimethylpyrrolidine»HCl as a white, crystalline solid (6.21 kg, 75% yield). ¾ NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-^6) δ 9.34 (br d, 2H), 3.33 (dd, J= 11.4, 8.4 Hz, 1H), 2.75 (dd, J = 11.4, 8.6 Hz, 1H), 2.50 – 2.39 (m, 1H), 1.97 (dd, J= 12.7, 7.7 Hz, 1H), 1.42 (s, 3H), 1.38 (dd, J= 12.8, 10.1 Hz, 1H), 1.31 (s, 3H), 1.05 (d, J= 6.6 Hz, 3H).
Part B: Synthesis of N-(benzenesulfonyl)-6-[3-[2-[l- (trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]pyrazol-l-yl]-2-[(4S)-2,2,4- trimethylpyrrolidin-l-yl]pyridine-3-carboxamide
HO‘ CF,
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Synthesis of starting materials:
Synthesis of terf-Butyl 2,6-dichloropyridine-3-carboxylate
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
[00386] A solution of 2,6-dichloropyridine-3-carboxylic acid (10 g, 52.08 mmol) in THF (210 mL) was treated successively with di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (17 g, 77.89 mmol) and 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine (3.2 g, 26.19 mmol) and stirred overnight at room temperature. At this point, HCI IN (400 mL) was added, and the mixture was stirred vigorously for about 10 minutes. The product was extracted with ethyl acetate (2x300mL), and the combined organic layers were washed with water (300 mL) and brine (150 mL) and dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure to give 12.94 g (96% yield) of tert-butyl 2,6-dichloropyridine-3-carboxylate as a colorless oil. ESI-MS m/z calc. 247.02, found 248.1 (M+1) +; Retention time: 2.27 minutes. ¾ NMR (300 MHz, CDCh) ppm 1.60 (s, 9H), 7.30 (d, J=7.9 Hz, 1H), 8.05 (d, J=8.2 Hz, 1H).
Synthesis of terf-Butyl 3-oxo-2,3-dihydro-lH-pyrazole-l-carboxylate
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
[00387] A 50L reactor was started, and the jacket was set to 20 °C, with stirring at 150 rpm, reflux condenser (10 °C) and nitrogen purge. MeOH (2.860 L) and methyl (E)-3-methoxyprop-2-enoate (2.643 kg, 22.76 mol) were added, and the reactor was capped. The reaction was heated to an internal temperature of 40 °C, and the system was set to hold jacket temperature at 40 °C. Hydrazine hydrate (1300 g of 55 %w/w, 22.31 mol) was added portion wise via addition funnel over 30 min. The reaction was heated to 60 °C for 1 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to 20 °C and triethyamine (2.483 kg, 3.420 L, 24.54 mol) was added portion-wise, maintaining reaction
temperature <30 °C. A solution of Boc anhydride (di-tert-butyl dicarbonate) (4.967 kg, 5.228 L, 22.76 mol) in MeOH (2.860 L) was added portion-wise maintaining temperature <45 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred at 20 °C for 16 h. The reaction solution was partially concentrated to remove MeOH, resulting in a clear, light amber oil. The resulting oil was transferred to the 50L reactor, stirred and water (7.150 L) and heptane (7.150 L) were added. The additions caused a small amount of the product to precipitate. The aqueous layer was drained into a clean container, and the interface and heptane layer were filtered to separate the solid (product). The aqueous layer was transferred back to the reactor, and the collected solid was placed back into the reactor and mixed with the aqueous layer. A dropping funnel was added to the reactor and loaded with acetic acid (1.474 kg, 1.396 L, 24.54 mol) and added dropwise. The jacket was set to 0 °C to absorb the quench exotherm. After the addition was complete (pH=5), the reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h. The solid was collected by filtration and washed with water (7.150 L) and washed a second time with water (3.575 L). The crystalline solid was transferred into a 20L rotovap bulb, and heptane (7.150 L) was added. The mixture was slurried at 45 °C for 30 mins, and 1-2 volumes of solvent were distilled off. The slurry in the rotovap flask was filtered, and the solids were washed with heptane (3.575 L). The solid was further dried in vacuo (50 °C, 15 mbar) to give tert-butyl 5-oxo-lH-pyrazole-2-carboxylate (2921 g, 71%) as a coarse, crystalline solid. ¾ MR
Synthesis of 2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethanol
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
[00388] To a solution of lithium aluminum hydride (293 mg, 7.732 mmol) in THF (10.00 mL) in an ice-bath, 2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]acetic acid (1.002 g, 5.948 mmol) in THF (3.0 mL) was added dropwise over a period of 30 minutes keeping the reaction temperature below 20 0 C. The mixture was allowed to gradually warm to ambient temperature and was stirred for 18 h. The mixture was cooled with an ice-bath and sequentially quenched with water (294 mg, 295 μΐ., 16.36 mmol), NaOH (297 μΐ. of 6 M, 1.784 mmol), and then water (884.0 μΐ., 49.07 mmol) to afford a granular solid in the mixture. The solid was filtered off using celite, and the precipitate was washed with ether. The filtrate was further dried with MgS04 and filtered and concentrated in vacuo to afford the product with residual THF and ether. The mixture was taken directly into the next step without further purification.
[00389] tert-Butyl 5-oxo-lH-pyrazole-2-carboxylate (1.043 g, 5.660 mmol), 2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethanol (916 mg, 5.943 mmol), and triphenyl phosphine (1.637 g, 6.243 mmol) were combined in THF (10.48 mL) and the reaction was cooled in an ice-bath. Diisopropyl azodicarboxylate (1.288 g, 1.254 mL, 6.368 mmol) was added dropwise to the reaction mixture, and the reaction was allowed to warm to room temperature for 16 hours. The mixture was evaporated, and the resulting material was partitioned between ethyl acetate (30 mL) and IN sodium hydroxide (30 mL). The organic layer was separated, washed with brine (30 mL), dried over sodium sulfate, and concentrated. The crude material was purified by silica gel chromatography eluting with a gradient of ethyl acetate in hexanes (0- 30%) to give tert-butyl 3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]pyrazole-l-carboxylate (1.03 g, 57%). ESI-MS m/z calc. 320.13, found 321.1 (M+1) +; Retention time: 0.72 minutes.
[00391] tert-Butyl 2,6-dichloropyridine-3-carboxylate (687 mg, 2.770 mmol), 3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]-lH-pyrazole (610 mg, 2.770 mmol), and freshly ground potassium carbonate (459 mg, 3.324 mmol) were combined in anhydrous DMSO (13.75 mL). l,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DAB CO (1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane), 62 mg, 0.5540 mmol) was added, and the mixture was
stirred at room temperature under nitrogen for 16 hours. The reaction mixture was diluted with water (20 mL) and stirred for 15 minutes. The resulting solid was collected and washed with water. The solid was dissolved in dichloromethane and dried over magnesium sulfate. The mixture was filtered and concentrated to give tert-butyl 2-chloro-6-[3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]pyrazol-l-yl]pyridine-3-carboxylate (1.01 g, 84%). ESI-MS m/z calc. 431.12, found 432.1 (M+l) +; Retention time: 0.88 minutes.
[00392] tert-Butyl 2-chloro-6-[3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]pyrazol-l-yl]pyridine-3-carboxylate (1.01 g, 2.339 mmol) and trifluoroacetic acid (1.8 mL, 23.39 mmol) were combined in dichloromethane (10 mL) and heated at 40 °C for 3 h. The reaction was concentrated. Hexanes were added, and the mixture was concentrated again to give 2-chloro-6-[3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]pyrazol-l-yl]pyridine-3-carboxylic acid (873 mg, 99%) ESI-MS m/z calc. 375.06, found 376.1 (M+l)+; Retention time: 0.69 minutes.
[00393] A solution of 2-chloro-6-[3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]
ethoxy]pyrazol-l-yl]pyridine-3-carboxylic acid (0.15 g, 0.3992 mmol) and carbonyl diimidazole (77 mg, 0.4790 mmol) in THF (2.0 mL) was stirred for one hour, and
benzenesulfonamide (81 mg, 0.5190 mmol) and DBU (72 μΐ^, 0.4790 mmol) were added. The reaction was stirred for 16 hours, acidified with 1 M aqueous citric acid, and extracted with ethyl acetate. The combined extracts were dried over sodium sulfate and evaporated. The residue was purified by silica gel chromatography eluting with a gradient of methanol in dichloromethane (0-5%) to give N-(benzenesulfonyl)-2-chloro-6-[3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]pyrazol-l-yl]pyridine-3-carboxamide (160 mg, 78%). ESI-MS m/z calc. 514.07, found 515.1 (M+l)+; Retention time: 0.74 minutes.
[00394] A mixture of N-(benzenesulfonyl)-2-chloro-6-[3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl] ethoxy]pyrazol-l-yl]pyridine-3-carboxamide (160 mg, 0.3107 mmol), (4S)-2,2,4-trimethylpyrrolidine hydrochloride salt (139 mg, 0.9321 mmol), and potassium carbonate (258 mg, 1.864 mmol) in DMSO (1.5 mL) was stirred at 130 °C for 17 hours. The reaction mixture was acidified with 1 M aqueous citric acid and extracted with ethyl acetate. The combined extracts were dried over sodium sulfate and evaporated to yield a crude product that was purified by reverse-phase HPLC utilizing a gradient of 10-99%) acetonitrile in 5 mM aqueous HC1 to yield N-(benzenesulfonyl)-6-[3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]pyrazol-l-yl]-2-[(4S)-2,2,4-trimethylpyrrolidin-l-yl]pyridine-3-carboxamide (87 mg, 47%). ESI-MS m/z calc. 591.21, found 592.3 (M+l) +; Retention time: 2.21 minutes. 1H MR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.48 (s, 1H), 8.19 (d, J= 2.8 Hz, 1H), 8.04 – 7.96 (m, 2H), 7.81 (d, J= 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.77 – 7.70 (m, 1H), 7.70 – 7.62 (m, 2H), 6.92 (d, J= 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.10 (d, J= 2.8 Hz, 1H), 4.31 (t, J= 7.0 Hz, 2H), 2.42 (t, J= 10.5 Hz, 1H), 2.28 (dd, J = 10.2, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.17 – 2.01 (m, 3H), 1.82 (dd, J= 11.9, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 1.52 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 6H), 1.36 (t, J= 12.1 Hz, 1H), 1.01 – 0.92 (m, 2H), 0.92 – 0.85 (m, 2H), 0.65 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 3H). pKa: 4.95±0.06.
Synthesis of sodium salt of N-(benzenesulfonyl)-6-[3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl) cyclopropyl]ethoxy]pyrazol-l-yl]-2-[(4S)-2,2,4-trimethylpyrrolidin-l-yl]pyridine-3-carboxamide (sodium salt of Compound I)
[00395] N-(benzenesulfonyl)-6-[3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]pyrazol-l-yl]-2-[(4S)-2,2,4-trimethylpyrrolidin-l-yl]pyridine-3-carboxamide (1000 mg, 1.679 mmol) was dissolved in ethanol (19.87 ml) under warming, filtered clear through a syringe filter (0.2 μπι), washed with warm ethanol (10 ml) and the warm solution was treated with 1M NaOH (1.679 ml, 1.679 mmol). The solution was evaporated at 30-35 °C, co-evaporated 3 times with ethanol (-20 ml), to give a solid, which was dried overnight under vacuum in a drying cabinet at 45 °C with a nitrogen bleed to give 951 mg of a cream colored solid. The solid was further dried under vacuum in a drying cabinet at 45 °C with a nitrogen bleed over the weekend. 930 mg (89%) of the sodium salt of N-(benzenesulfonyl)-6-[3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]pyrazol-l-yl]-2-[(4S)-2,2,4-trimethylpyrrolidin-l-yl]pyridine-3-carboxamide was obtained as an off-white amorphous solid. ¾ NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d) δ 8.15 (d, J= 2.7 Hz, 1H), 7.81 (dd, J= 6.7, 3.1 Hz, 2H), 7.61 (d, J= 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.39 (dd, J= 4.9, 2.0 Hz, 3H), 6.74 (d, J= 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.01 (d, J= 2.6 Hz, 1H), 4.29 (t, J= 7.0 Hz, 2H), 2.93 – 2.78 (m, 2H), 2.07 (t, J= 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.78 (dd, J= 11.8, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 1.52 (d, J= 13.6 Hz, 6H), 1.33 (t, J= 12.0 Hz, 1H), 1.00 – 0.92 (m, 2H), 0.89 (q, J= 5.3, 4.6 Hz, 2H), 0.71 (d, J= 6.3 Hz, 3H). EST-MS m/z calc. 591.2127, found 592.0 (M+l)+; Retention time: 3.28 minutes. XRPD (see FIG. 16).
Alternate synthesis of 2-Chloro-6-[3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy] pyrazol-l-yl] pyridine-3-carboxylic acid
Step 1: ethyl 3-hydroxy-lH-pyrazole-4-carboxylate
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
[00396] A mixture of EtOH (20.00 L, 10 vol) and diethyl 2-(ethoxymethylene) propanedioate (2000 g, 9.249 mol, 1.0 equiv) was added under nitrogen purge a to a 50 L reactor equipped with a reflux condenser (10 °C) and the jacket set to 40 °C. The mixture was stirred, and then hydrazine hydrate (538.9 g of 55 %w/w, 523.7 mL of 55 %w/w, 9.249 mol, 1.00 equiv) was added in portions via an addition funnel. Once the addition was complete, the reaction was heated to 75 °C for 22 h to afford a solution of ethyl 3-hydroxy-lH-pyrazole-4-carboxylate that was used directly in the next step.
[00397] The solution of ethyl 3 -hydroxy- lH-pyrazole-4-carboxylate was cooled from 75 °C to 40 °C, then triethylamine (TEA) (46.80 g, 64.46 mL, 462.5 mmol, 0.05 eq.) was added. A solution of Boc anhydride (2.119 kg, 9.711 moll .05 equiv) in EtOH (2.000 L, 1 equiv) was added to the reactor over 35 min. The mixture was stirred for 4 hours to complete the reaction; then water (10.00 L, 5.0 vol) was added over 15 mins. The resulting mixture was cooled to 20 °C to complete crystallization of the product. The crystals were allowed to age for 1 hour, then the mixture was filtered. The solid was washed with a mixture of EtOH (4.000 L, 2.0 vol) and water (2.000 L, 1.0 vol). The solid was then dried in vacuo to afford l-(tert-butyl)-4-ethyl-3-hydroxy-lH-pyrazole-1,4-dicarboxylate (1530 g, 65%) as colorless, fine needle, crystalline solid. ¾ NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-de) δ 11.61 (s, 1H), 8.40 (s, 1H), 4.20 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.56 (s, 9H), 1.25 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H).
[00398] A 5L reactor was started with the jacket set to 40 °C, stirring at 450 rpm, reflux condenser at room temperature and nitrogen purge. The vessel was charged with toluene (1.0L, 10.0 vol), 2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethanol (lOO.Og, 648.8 mmol, 1.0 equiv), and l-(tert-butyl) 4-ethyl 3-hydroxy-lH-pyrazole-l,4-dicarboxylate (166.3 g, 648.8 mmol), and the mixture was stirred. The reaction mixture was charged with triphenyl phosphine (195.7 g, 746.1 mmol, 1.15 equiv), then the reactor was set to maintain an internal temperature of 40 °C. Diisopropyl azoldicarboxylate (150.9 g, 746.1 mmol, 1.15 equiv) was added into an addition funnel and was added to the reaction while maintaining the reaction temperature between 40 and 50 °C (addition was exothermic, exotherm addition controlled), and stirred for a total of 2.5 hours. Once the reaction was deemed complete by HPLC, heptane was added (400 mL, 4 vol), the solution was cooled to 20 °C over 60 minutes, and the bulk of triphenylphosphine oxide-DIAD complex (TPPO-DIAD) crystallized out. Once at room temp, the mixture was filtered, and the solid was washed with heptane (400 mL, 4.0 vol) and pulled dry. The filtrate was used in the next step as a solution in toluene-heptane without further purification.
[00399] A 500mL reactor was started with the jacket set to 40 °C, stirring at 450 rpm, reflux condenser at room temp, and nitrogen purge. The vessel was charged with a toluene solution consisting of approximately 160 mmol, 65.0 g of l-(tert-butyl) 4-ethyl 3-(2-(l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl)ethoxy)-lH-pyrazole-l,4-dicarboxylate in 3 vol of toluene (prepared by concentrating a 25% portion of filtrate from previous reaction down to 4 volumes in a rotovap). The reaction was set to maintain an internal temperature at 40 °C and KOH (33.1 g, 1.5 eq. of aqueous 45 % KOH solution) was added in one portion, resulting in a mild exothermic addition, while CO2 was generated upon removal of the protecting group. The reaction proceeded for 1.5 hr, monitored by HPLC, with the product partially crystallizing during the reaction. Heptane (160 mL, 2.5 vol) was added to the reaction mixture and the reaction was cooled to room temperature over 30 minutes. The resulting mixture was filtered, and the solid was
washed with heptane (80.00 mL, 1.25 vol), pulled dry, then dried in vacuo (55 °C, vacuum). 52.3 g of ethyl 3-(2-(l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl)ethoxy)-lH-pyrazole-4-carboxylate was obtained as a crude, colorless solid that was used without further purification.
[00400] A 500mL reactor was started with the jacket set to 40 °C, stirring at 450 rpm, reflux condenser at room temp, and nitrogen purge. The vessel was charged with methanol (150.0 mL, 3.0 vol), a solution of ethyl 3-(2-(l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl) ethoxy)-lH-pyrazole-4-carboxylate (50.0 g, 171.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv), and the reaction was stirred to suspend the solids. The reactor was set to maintain internal temperature at 40 °C. To the mixture was added KOH (96 g of aqueous 45 % KOH, 1.71 mol, 10.0 equiv) in portions maintaining the internal temperature <50 °C. Once addition was complete, the reaction was set to maintain temperature at 50 °C, and the reaction proceeded for 23 hours, monitored by HPLC. Once complete the reaction was cooled to 10 °C then partially concentrated on a rotary evaporator to remove most of the MeOH. The resulting solution was diluted with water (250 mL, 5.0 vol) and 2-Me-THF (150 mL, 3.0 vol), and transferred to the reactor, stirred at room temp, then stopped, and layers were allowed to separate. The layers were tested, with remaining TPPO-DIAD complex in the organic layer and product in the aqueous layer. The aqueous layer was washed again with 2-Me-THF (100 mL, 2.0 vol), the layers separated, and the aqueous layer returned to the reactor vessel. The stirrer was started and set to 450 rpm, and the reactor jacket was set to 0 °C. The pH was adjusted to pH acidic by addition of 6M aqueous HC1 (427mL, 15 equiv) portion wise, maintaining the internal temperature between 10 and 30 °C. The product began to crystallize close to pH neutral and was accompanied with strong off-gassing, and so the acid was added slowly, and then further added to reach pH 1 once the off-gassing had ended. To the resulting suspension was added 2-Me-THF (400 mL, 8.0 vol), and the product was allowed to dissolve into
the organic layer. Stirring was stopped, the layers were separated, and the aqueous layer was returned to the reactor, stirred and re-extracted with 2-Me-THF (100 mL, 2.0 vol). The organic layers were combined in the reactor and stirred at room temperature, washed with brine (lOOmL, 2 vols), dried over Na2S04, filtered through celite, and the solid was washed with 2-Me-THF (50 mL, 1.0 vol). The filtrate was transferred to a clean rotovap flask, stirred, warmed to 50 °C and heptane (200 mL, 4.0 vol) added, and then partially concentrated with the addition of heptane (300 mL, 6.0 vol) and then seeded with 50mg of 3-(2-(l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl)ethoxy)-lH-pyrazole-4-carboxylic acid), and the product crystallized during solvent removal. The distillation was stopped when the bulk of the 2-Me-THF had distilled off. The bath heater was turned off, the vacuum removed, and the mixture was allowed to stir and cool to room temperature. The mixture was filtered (slow speed) and the solid was washed with heptane (100 mL, 2.0 vol), and the solid was collected and dried in vacuo (50 °C, rotovap). 22.47 g of 3-(2-(l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl)ethoxy)-lH-pyrazole-4-carboxylic acid was obtained as an off-white solid. ¾ MR (400 MHz, DMSO-de) δ
[00401] A mixture of toluene (490.0 mL), 3-(2-(l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl) ethoxy)-lH-pyrazole-4-carboxylic acid (70.0 g, 264.9 mmol), and DMSO (70.00 mL) was placed in a reactor and heated to 100 °C with stirring. DBU (approximately 20.16 g, 19.80 mL, 132.4 mmol) was added to the reactor over 15 min. The mixture was stirred for 20 h to complete the reaction and then cooled to 20 °C. The mixture was washed with water (350.0 mL), then 0.5N aq HC1 (280.0 mL), then water (2 x 140.0 mL), and lastly with brine (210.0 mL). The organic layer was dried with Na2S04, and then activated charcoal (5 g, Darco 100 mesh) was added to the stirred slurry. The dried mixture was filtered through celite, and the solid was washed with toluene (140.0 mL) and then pulled dry. The filtrate was concentrated in a rotovap (50 °C, vac) to afford 3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]-lH-pyrazole (30.89 g, 53%) as an amber oil. 1H MR (400 MHz, DMSO-d) δ 11.87 (s, 1H), 7.50 (d, J= 2.4 Hz, 1H), 5.63 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 4.23 – 4.06 (m, 2H), 2.01 (t, J= 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.00 – 0.77 (m, 4H).
[00402] A mixture of DMF (180.0 mL), ethyl 2,6-dichloropyridine-3-carboxylate (approximately 29.97 g, 136.2 mmol), 3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]-lH-pyrazole (30.0 g, 136.2 mmol), and K2CO3, (325 mesh, approximately 24.48 g, 177.1 mmol) was added to a stirred reactor at 20 °C. DABCO (approximately 2.292 g, 20.43 mmol) was then added to the reactor, and the mixture was stirred at 20 °C for 1 hour, and then the temperature was increased to 30 °C, and the mixture stirred for 24 hours to complete the reaction. The mixture was cooled to 20 °C; then water (360 mL) was added slowly. The mixture was then drained from the reactor and the solid was isolated by filtration. The solid was then washed with water (2 x 150 mL), and then the solid was dried under vacuum at 55 °C to afford ethyl 2-chloro-6-[3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]pyrazol-l-yl]pyridine-3-carboxylate (51.37 g, 93%) as a fine, beige colored solid. ¾ MR (400 MHz, DMSO-^e) δ 8.44 (d, J= 2.9 Hz, 1H), 8.41 (d, J= 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (d, J= 8.5 Hz, 1H), 6.21 (d, J= 2.9 Hz, 1H), 4.34 (m, 4H), 2.09 (t, J= 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.34 (t, J= 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.00 – 0.84 (m, 4H).
[00403] A solution of ethyl 2-chloro-6-[3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl] ethoxy]pyrazol-l-yl]pyridine-3-carboxylate (50.0 g, 123.8 mmol) in THF (300.0 mL) was prepared in a reactor at 20 °C. EtOH (150.0 mL) was added, followed by aqueous NaOH (approximately 59.44 g of 10 %w/w, 148.6 mmol). The mixture was stirred for 1 hour to complete the reaction; then aq IN HC1 (750.0 mL) was slowly added. The resulting suspension was stirred for 30 min at 10 °C, and then the solid was isolated by filtration. The solid was washed with water (150 mL then 2 x 100 mL) and then pulled dry by vacuum. The solid was then further dried under vacuum with heating to afford 2-chloro-6-[3-[2-[l-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl]ethoxy]pyrazol-l-yl]pyridine-3-carboxylic acid (42.29 g, 91%). ¾ NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-i¾) δ 13.63 (s, 1H), 8.48 -8.35 (m, 2H), 7.73 (d, J= 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.20 (d, J= 2.9 Hz, 1H), 4.35 (t, J= 7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.09 (t, J= 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.01 – 0.82 (m, 4H).
Example 2: Preparation of a Spray Dried Dispersion (SDD) of Compound I
[00404] A spray dried dispersion of Compound I (free form) was prepared using Buchi Mini Spray Dryer B290. HPMCAS-HG (6.0 grams) was dissolved in 200 mL of MeOH/DCM (1/1), and Compound I (6.0 grams) was added and stirred for 30 minutes forming a clear solution. The resulting solution was spray dried under the following conditions resulting in a 50 wt% Compound 1/50 wt% HPMCAS- HG spray dried dispersion (Yield: 80%, Solid load: 6%). FIG. 14 shows the XRPD spectrum of a SDD of 50% Compound I in HPMCAS-HG. FIG. 15 is spectrum showing modulated differential scanning calorimetry (MDSC) spectrum of a spray dried dispersion (SDD) of 50% Compound I in HPMCAS-HG.
Table 64 SDD of Compound I
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Example 3: Synthesis of Compound II: (R)-l-(2,2-Difluorobenzo[d][l,3]dioxol-5- yl)-N-(l-(2,3-dihydroxypropyl)-6-fluoro-2-(l-hydroxy-2- -2-yl)-lH-indol-5-yl)cyclopropanecarboxamide
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Step 1: (R)-Benzyl 2-(l-((2,2-dimethyl-l,3-dioxolan-4-yl)methyl)-6-fluoro-5-nitro-lH-indol-2-yl)-2-methylpropanoate and ((S)-2,2-Dimethyl-l,3-dioxolan-4-yl)methyl 2-(l-(((R)-2,2-dimethyl-l,3-dioxolan-4-yl)methyl)-6-fluoro-5-nitro-lH-indol-2-yl)-2-methylpropanoate
[00405] Cesium carbonate (8.23 g, 25.3 mmol) was added to a mixture of benzyl 2-(6-fluoro-5-nitro-lH-indol-2-yl)-2-methylpropanoate (3.0 g, 8.4 mmol) and (S)-(2,2-dimethyl-l,3-dioxolan-4-yl)methyl 4-methylbenzenesulfonate (7.23 g, 25.3 mmol) in DMF (N,N-dimethylformamide) (17 mL). The reaction was stirred at 80 °C for 46 hours under a nitrogen atmosphere. The mixture was then partitioned between ethyl acetate and water. The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate. The combined ethyl acetate layers were washed with brine, dried over MgS04, filtered and concentrated. The crude product, a viscous brown oil which contains both of the products shown above, was taken directly to the next step without further purification. (R)-Benzyl 2-(l-((2,2-dimethyl-l,3-dioxolan-4-yl)methyl)-6-fluoro-5-nitro-lH-indol-2-yl)-2-methylpropanoate, ESI-MS m/z calc. 470.2, found 471.5 (M+l)+. Retention time 2.20 minutes. ((S)-2,2-Dimethyl-l,3-dioxolan-4-yl)methyl 2-(l-(((R)-2,2-dimethyl-l,3-dioxolan-4-yl)methyl)-6-fluoro-5-nitro-lH-indol-2-yl)-2-methylpropanoate, ESI-MS m/z calc. 494.5, found 495.7 (M+l)+. Retention time 2.01 minutes.
[00406] The crude reaction mixture obtained in step (A) was dissolved in THF (tetrahydrofuran) (42 mL) and cooled in an ice-water bath. LiAlH4 (16.8 mL of 1 M solution, 16.8 mmol) was added drop-wise. After the addition was complete, the
mixture was stirred for an additional 5 minutes. The reaction was quenched by adding water (1 mL), 15% NaOH solution (1 mL) and then water (3 mL). The mixture was filtered over Celite, and the solids were washed with THF and ethyl acetate. The filtrate was concentrated and purified by column chromatography (30-60% ethyl acetate-hexanes) to obtain (R)-2-(l-((2,2-dimethyl-l,3-dioxolan-4-yl)methyl)-6-fluoro-5-nitro-lH-indol-2-yl)-2-methylpropan-l-ol as a brown oil (2.68g, 87 % over 2 steps). ESI-MS m/z calc. 366.4, found 367.3 (M+l)+. Retention time 1.68 minutes. 1H MR (400 MHz, DMSO-^6) δ 8.34 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (d, J = 13.4 Hz, 1H), 6.57 (s, 1H), 4.94 (t, J = 5.4 Hz, 1H), 4.64 – 4.60 (m, 1H), 4.52 – 4.42(m, 2H), 4.16 – 4.14 (m, 1H), 3.76 – 3.74 (m, 1H), 3.63 – 3.53 (m, 2H), 1.42 (s, 3H), 1.38 – 1.36 (m, 6H) and 1.19 (s, 3H) ppm. (DMSO is dimethylsulfoxide).
[00407] (R)-2-(l-((2,2-dimethyl-l,3-dioxolan-4-yl)methyl)-6-fluoro-5-nitro-lH-indol-2-yl)-2-methylpropan-l-ol (2.5 g, 6.82 mmol) was dissolved in ethanol (70 mL) and the reaction was flushed with N2. Then Pd-C (250 mg, 5% wt) was added. The reaction was flushed with nitrogen again and then stirred under H2 (atm). After 2.5 hours only partial conversion to the product was observed by LCMS. The reaction was filtered through Celite and concentrated. The residue was re-subjected to the conditions above. After 2 hours LCMS indicated complete conversion to product. The reaction mixture was filtered through Celite. The filtrate was concentrated to yield the product (1.82 g, 79 %). ESI-MS m/z calc. 336.2, found 337.5 (M+l)+. Retention time 0.86 minutes. ¾ NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-^6) δ 7.17 (d, J = 12.6 Hz, 1H), 6.76 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 6.03 (s, 1H), 4.79 – 4.76 (m, 1H), 4.46 (s, 2H), 4.37 – 4.31 (m, 3H),4.06 (dd, J = 6.1, 8.3 Hz, 1H), 3.70 – 3.67 (m, 1H), 3.55 – 3.52 (m, 2H), 1.41 (s, 3H), 1.32 (s, 6H) and 1.21 (s, 3H) ppm.
[00408] DMF (3 drops) was added to a stirring mixture of l-(2,2-difluorobenzo[d][l,3]dioxol-5-yl)cyclopropanecarboxylic acid (1.87 g, 7.7 mmol) and thionyl chloride (1.30 mL, 17.9 mmol). After 1 hour a clear solution had formed. The
solution was concentrated under vacuum and then toluene (3 mL) was added and the mixture was concentrated again. The toluene step was repeated once more and the residue was placed on high vacuum for 10 minutes. The acid chloride was then dissolved in dichloromethane (10 mL) and added to a mixture of (R)-2-(5 -amino- 1-((2,2-dimethyl-l,3-dioxolan-4-yl)methyl)-6-fluoro-lH-indol-2-yl)-2-methylpropan-l-ol (1.8 g, 5.4 mmol) and triethylamine (2.24 mL, 16.1 mmol) in dichloromethane (45 mL). The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 1 hour. The reaction was washed with IN HC1 solution, saturated NaHCCb solution and brine, dried over MgSCb and concentrated to yield the product (3g, 100%). ESI-MS m/z calc. 560.6, found 561.7 (M+l)+. Retention time 2.05 minutes. ¾ NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-^6) δ 8.31 (s, 1H), 7.53 (s, 1H), 7.42 – 7.40 (m, 2H), 7.34 – 7.30 (m, 3H), 6.24 (s, 1H), 4.51 – 4.48 (m, 1H), 4.39 – 4.34 (m,2H), 4.08 (dd, J = 6.0, 8.3 Hz, 1H), 3.69 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.58 – 3.51 (m, 2H), 1.48 – 1.45 (m, 2H), 1.39 (s, 3H), 1.34 – 1.33 (m, 6H), 1.18 (s, 3H) and 1.14 -1.12 (m, 2H) ppm
[00410] A mixture of aniline (25.6 g, 0.275 mol) and diethyl 2-(ethoxymethylene)malonate (62.4 g, 0.288 mol) was heated at 140-150 °C for 2 h. The mixture was cooled to room temperature and dried under reduced pressure to afford 2-phenylaminomethylene-malonic acid diethyl ester as a solid, which was used in the next step without further purification. ¾ MR (OMSO-de) δ 1 1.00 (d, 1H), 8.54 (d, J = 13.6 Hz, 1H), 7.36-7.39 (m, 2H), 7.13-7.17 (m, 3H), 4.17-4.33 (m, 4H), 1.18-1.40 (m, 6H).
[00411] A I L three-necked flask fitted with a mechanical stirrer was charged with 2-phenylaminomethylene-malonic acid diethyl ester (26.3 g, 0.100 mol), polyphosphoric acid (270 g) and phosphoryl chloride (750 g). The mixture was heated to 70 °C and stirred for 4 h. The mixture was cooled to room temperature and filtered. The residue was treated with aqueous Na2CCb solution, filtered, washed with water and dried. 4-Hydroxyquinoline-3-carboxylic acid ethyl ester was obtained as a pale brown solid (15.2 g, 70%). The crude product was used in next step without further purification.
[00412] 4-Hydroxyquinoline-3-carboxylic acid ethyl ester (15 g, 69 mmol) was suspended in sodium hydroxide solution (2N, 150 mL) and stirred for 2 h at reflux. After cooling, the mixture was filtered, and the filtrate was acidified to pH 4 with 2N HCl. The resulting precipitate was collected via filtration, washed with water and dried under vacuum to give 4-oxo-l,4-dihydroquinoline-3-carboxylic acid as a pale white solid (10.5 g, 92 %). ¾ MR (DMSO-^e) δ 15.34 (s, 1 H), 13.42 (s, 1 H), 8.89 (s, 8.28 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.88 (m, 1H), 7.81 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (m, 1H).
Part B: Synthesis of N-(2,4-di-terf-butyl-5-hydroxyphenyl)-4-oxo-l,4-dihydroquinoline-3-carboxamide
[00413] Methyl chloroformate (58 mL, 750 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of 2,4-di-fert-butyl-phenol (103.2 g, 500 mmol), Et3N (139 mL, 1000 mmol) and DMAP (3.05 g, 25 mmol) in dichloromethane (400 mL) cooled in an ice-water bath to 0 °C. The mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature while stirring overnight, then filtered through silica gel (approx. 1L) using 10% ethyl acetate – hexanes (~ 4 L) as the eluent. The combined filtrates were concentrated to yield carbonic acid 2,4-di-tert-butyl-phenyl ester methyl ester as a yellow oil (132 g, quant.). ¾ MR (400 MHz, DMSO-i¾) δ 7.35 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 3.85 (s, 3H), 1.30 (s, 9H), 1.29 (s, 9H).
[00414] To a stirring mixture of carbonic acid 2,4-di-tert-butyl-phenyl ester methyl ester (4.76 g, 180 mmol) in cone, sulfuric acid (2 mL), cooled in an ice-water bath, was added a cooled mixture of sulfuric acid (2 mL) and nitric acid (2 mL). The addition was done slowly so that the reaction temperature did not exceed 50 °C. The reaction was allowed to stir for 2 h while warming to room temperature. The reaction mixture was then added to ice-water and extracted into diethyl ether. The ether layer was dried (MgS04), concentrated and purified by column chromatography (0 – 10% ethyl acetate – hexanes) to yield a mixture of carbonic acid 2,4-di-tert-butyl-5-nitro-phenyl ester methyl ester and carbonic acid 2,4-di-tert-butyl-6-nitro-phenyl ester methyl ester as a pale yellow solid (4.28 g), which was used directly in the next step.
Step 3: 2,4-Di-terf-butyl-5-nitro-phenol and 2,4-Di-terf-butyl-6-nitro-phenol
[00415] The mixture of carbonic acid 2,4-di-tert-butyl-5-nitro-phenyl ester methyl ester and carbonic acid 2,4-di-tert-butyl-6-nitro-phenyl ester methyl ester (4.2 g, 14.0 mmol) was dissolved in MeOH (65 mL) before KOH (2.0 g, 36 mmol) was added. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The reaction mixture was then made acidic (pH 2-3) by adding cone. HC1 and partitioned between water and diethyl ether. The ether layer was dried (MgS04), concentrated and purified by column
[00416] To a refluxing solution of 2,4-di-tert-butyl-5-nitro-phenol (1.86 g, 7.40 mmol) and ammonium formate (1.86 g) in ethanol (75 mL) was added Pd-5% wt. on activated carbon (900 mg). The reaction mixture was stirred at reflux for 2 h, cooled to room temperature and filtered through Celite. The Celite was washed with methanol and the combined filtrates were concentrated to yield 5-amino-2,4-di-tert-butyl-phenol as a grey solid (1.66 g, quant.). ¾ MR (400 MHz, DMSO-^e) δ 8.64 (s, 1H, OH), 6.84 (s, 1H), 6.08 (s, 1H), 4.39 (s, 2H, H2), 1.27 (m, 18H); HPLC ret. time 2.72 min, 10-99 % CftCN, 5 min run; ESI-MS 222.4 m/z [M+H]+.
[00417] To a suspension of 4-oxo-l,4-dihydroquinolin-3-carboxylic acid (35.5 g, 188 mmol) and HBTU (85.7 g, 226 mmol) in DMF (280 mL) was added Et3N (63.0 mL, 451 mmol) at ambient temperature. The mixture became homogeneous and was allowed to stir for 10 min before 5-amino-2,4-di-tert-butyl-phenol (50.0 g, 226 mmol) was added in small portions. The mixture was allowed to stir overnight at ambient temperature. The mixture became heterogeneous over the course of the reaction. After all of the acid was consumed (LC-MS analysis, MH+ 190, 1.71 min), the solvent was removed in vacuo. EtOH (ethyl alcohol) was added to the orange solid material to produce a slurry. The mixture was stirred on a rotovap (bath temperature 65 °C) for 15 min without placing the system under vacuum. The mixture was filtered and the captured solid was washed with hexanes to provide a white solid that was the EtOH crystalate. Et20
(diethyl ether) was added to the solid obtained above until a slurry was formed. The mixture was stirred on a rotovapor (bath temperature 25 °C) for 15 min without placing the system under vacuum. The mixture was filtered and the solid captured. This procedure was performed a total of five times. The solid obtained after the fifth precipitation was placed under vacuum overnight to provide N-(5-hydroxy-2,4-di-tert-butyl-phenyl)-4-oxo-lH-quinoline-3-carboxamide (38 g, 52%). HPLC ret. time 3.45 min, 10-99% CftCN, 5 min run; 1H MR (400 MHz, DMSO-i¾) δ 12.88 (s, 1H), 11.83 (s, 1H), 9.20 (s, 1H), 8.87 (s, 1H), 8.33 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.83-7.79 (m, 1H), 7.76 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.54-7.50 (m, 1H), 7.17 (s, 1H), 7.10 (s, 1H), 1.38 (s, 9H), 1.37 (s, 9H); ESI-MS m/z calc’d 392.21; found 393.3 [M+H]+.
PAPER
The New England journal of medicine (2018), 379(17), 1599-1611
Many current medicines suffer from poor absorption, distribution, metabolism and/or excretion (ADME) properties that prevent their wider use or limit their use in certain indications. Poor ADME properties are also a major reason for the failure of drug candidates in clinical trials. While formulation technologies and prodrug strategies can be employed in some cases to improve certain ADME properties, these approaches often fail to address the underlying ADME problems that exist for many drugs and drug candidates. One such problem is rapid metabolism that causes a number of drugs, which otherwise would be highly effective in treating a disease, to be cleared too rapidly from the body. A possible solution to rapid drug clearance is frequent or high dosing to attain a sufficiently high plasma level of drug. This, however, introduces a number of potential treatment problems such as poor patient compliance with the dosing regimen, side effects that become more acute with higher doses, and increased cost of treatment. A rapidly metabolized drug may also expose patients to undesirable toxic or reactive metabolites.
[3] Another ADME limitation that affects many medicines is the formation of toxic or biologically reactive metabolites. As a result, some patients receiving the drug may experience toxicities, or the safe dosing of such drugs may be limited such that patients receive a suboptimal amount of the active agent. In certain cases, modifying dosing intervals or formulation approaches can help to reduce clinical adverse effects, but often the formation of such undesirable metabolites is intrinsic to the metabolism of the compound.
[4] In some select cases, a metabolic inhibitor will be co-administered with a drug that is cleared too rapidly. Such is the case with the protease inhibitor class of drugs that are used to treat HIV infection. The FDA recommends that these drugs be co-dosed with ritonavir, an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 enzyme 3A4 (CYP3A4), the enzyme typically responsible for their metabolism (see Kempf, D.J. et al., Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1997, 41(3): 654-60). Ritonavir, however, causes adverse effects and adds to the pill burden for HIV patients who must already take a combination of different drugs. Similarly, the CYP2D6 inhibitor quinidine has been added to dextromethorphan for the purpose of reducing rapid CYP2D6 metabolism of dextromethorphan in a treatment of pseudobulbar affect. Quinidine, however, has unwanted side effects that greatly limit its use in potential combination therapy (see Wang, L et al., Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 1994, 56(6 Pt 1): 659-67; and FDA label for quinidine at http://www.accessdata.fda.gov).
[5] In general, combining drugs with cytochrome P450 inhibitors is not a satisfactory strategy for decreasing drug clearance. The inhibition of a CYP enzyme’s activity can affect the metabolism and clearance of other drugs metabolized by that same enzyme. CYP inhibition can cause other drugs to accumulate in the body to toxic levels.
[6] A potentially attractive strategy for improving a drug’s metabolic properties is deuterium modification. In this approach, one attempts to slow the CYP-mediated metabolism of a drug or to reduce the formation of undesirable metabolites by replacing one or more hydrogen atoms with deuterium atoms. Deuterium is a safe, stable, nonradioactive isotope of hydrogen. Compared to hydrogen, deuterium forms stronger bonds with carbon. In select cases, the increased bond strength imparted by deuterium can positively impact the ADME properties of a drug, creating the potential for improved drug efficacy, safety, and/or tolerability. At the same time, because the size and shape of deuterium are essentially identical to those of hydrogen, replacement of hydrogen by deuterium would not be expected to affect the biochemical potency and selectivity of the drug as compared to the original chemical entity that contains only hydrogen.
[7] Over the past 35 years, the effects of deuterium substitution on the rate of metabolism have been reported for a very small percentage of approved drugs (see, e.g., Blake, MI et al, J Pharm Sci, 1975, 64:367-91; Foster, AB, Adv Drug Res, 1985, 14: 1-40 (“Foster”); Kushner, DJ et al, Can J Physiol Pharmacol, 1999, 79-88; Fisher, MB et al, Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel, 2006, 9: 101-09 (“Fisher”)). The results have been variable and unpredictable. For some compounds deuteration caused decreased metabolic clearance in vivo. For others, there was no change in metabolism. Still others demonstrated increased metabolic clearance. The variability in deuterium effects has also led experts to question or dismiss deuterium modification as a viable drug design strategy for inhibiting adverse metabolism (see Foster at p. 35 and Fisher at p. 101).
[8] The effects of deuterium modification on a drug’s metabolic properties are not predictable even when deuterium atoms are incorporated at known sites of metabolism. Only by actually preparing and testing a deuterated drug can one determine if and how the rate of metabolism will differ from that of its non-deuterated counterpart. See, for example, Fukuto et al. (J. Med. Chem., 1991, 34, 2871-76). Many drugs have multiple sites where metabolism is possible. The site(s) where deuterium substitution is required and the extent of deuteration necessary to see an effect on metabolism, if any, will be different for each drug.
[9] This invention relates to novel derivatives of ivacaftor, and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof. This invention also provides compositions comprising a compound of this invention and the use of such compositions in methods of treating diseases and conditions that are beneficially treated by administering a CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) potentiator.
[10] Ivacaftor, also known as VX-770 and by the chemical name, N-(2,4-di-tert-butyl-5-hydroxyphenyl)-4-oxo-1,4-dihydroquinoline-3-carboxamide, acts as a CFTR potentiator. Results from phase III trials of VX-770 in patients with cystic fibrosis carrying at least one copy of the G551D-CFTR mutation demonstrated marked levels of improvement in lung function and other key indicators of the disease including sweat chloride levels, likelihood of pulmonary exacerbations and body weight. VX-770 is also currently in phase II clinical trials in combination with VX-809 (a CFTR corrector) for the oral treatment of cystic fibrosis patients who carry the more common AF508-CFTR mutation. VX-770 was granted fast track designation and orphan drug designation by the FDA in 2006 and 2007, respectively.
[11] Despite the beneficial activities of VX-770, there is a continuing need for new compounds to treat the aforementioned diseases and conditions.
The use according to embodiment 1, comprising administering to the patient an effect amount of (N-(2-(tert-butyl)-5-hydroxy-4-(2-(methyl-d3)propan-2-yl-l, 1, 1,3, 3,3-d6)phenyl)-4-oxo-l,4-dihydroquinoline-3-carboxamide (Compound Il-d):
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Il-d
PATENT
WO 2019018395,
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
CONTD…………………………..
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
//////////////////deutivacaftor, Orphan Drug Status, Cystic fibrosis, CTP-656, D9-ivacaftor, Deutivacaftor, Ivacaftor D9, UNII-SHA6U5FJZL, VX-561, WHO 10704, PHASE 2
Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases (COPD), AND Cystic fibrosis, Nivalis Therapeutics, phase 2
The product was originated at Nivalis Therapeutics, which was acquired by Alpine Immune Sciences in 2017. In 2018, Alpine announced the sale and transfer of global rights to Laurel Venture Capital for further product development.
In 2016, orphan drug and fast track designations were granted to the compound in the U.S. for the treatment of cystic fibrosis.
20 Jul 2018 Laurel Venture Capital acquires global rights for cavosonstat from Alpine Immune Sciences
20 Jul 2018 Laurel Venture Capital plans a phase II trial for Asthma
24 Jun 2018 Biomarkers information updated
Cavosonstat, alos known as N91115) an orally bioavailable inhibitor of S-nitrosoglutathione reductase, promotes cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) maturation and plasma membrane stability, with a mechanism of action complementary to CFTR correctors and potentiators.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.Cavosonstat (N91115) was an experimental therapy being developed by Nivalis Therapeutics. Its primary mechanism of action was to inhibit the S-nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR) enzyme and to stabilize cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) protein activity. A press release published in February announced the end of research for this therapy in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients with F508del mutations. The drug, which did not meet primary endpoints in a Phase 2 trial, had been referred to as the first of a new class of compounds that stabilizes the CFTR activity.
History of cavosonstat
During preclinical studies, N91115 (later named cavosonstat) demonstrated an improvement in cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) stability.
A Phase 1 study was initiated in 2014 to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (how a drug is processed in the body) of the drug in healthy volunteers. Later that year, the pharmacokinetics of the drug were assessed in another Phase 1 trial involving CF patients with F508del mutation suffering from pancreatic insufficiency. Results were presented a year later by Nivalis, revealing good tolerance and safety in study participants.
A second, much smaller Phase 2 study (NCT02724527) assessed cavosonstat as an add-on therapy to ivacaftor (Kalydeco). This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study included 19 participants who received treatment with cavosonstat (400 mg) added to Kalydeco or with placebo added to Kalydeco. The primary objective was change in lung function from the study’s start to week 8. However, the treatment did not demonstrate a benefit in lung function measures or in sweat chloride reduction at eight weeks (primary objective). As a result, Nivalis decided not to continue development of cavosonstat for CF treatment.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had granted cavosonstat both fast track and orphan drug designations in 2016.
How cavosonstat works
The S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) is a signaling molecule that is present in high concentrations in the fluids of the lungs or muscle tissues, playing an important role in the dilatation of the airways. GSNO levels are regulated by the GSNO reductase (GSNOR) enzyme, altering CFTR activity in the membrane. In CF patients, GSNO levels are low, causing a loss of the airway function.
Cavosonstat’s mechanism of action is achieved through GSNOR inhibition, which was presumed to control the deficient CFTR protein. Preclinical studies showed that cavosonstat restored GSNO levels.
The chemical compound nitric oxide is a gas with chemical formula NO. NO is one of the few gaseous signaling molecules known in biological systems, and plays an important role in controlling various biological events. For example, the endothelium uses NO to signal surrounding smooth muscle in the walls of arterioles to relax, resulting in vasodilation and increased blood flow to hypoxic tissues. NO is also involved in regulating smooth muscle proliferation, platelet function, and neurotransmission, and plays a role in host defense. Although NO is highly reactive and has a lifetime of a few seconds, it can both diffuse freely across membranes and bind to many molecular targets. These attributes make NO an ideal signaling molecule capable of controlling biological events between adjacent cells and within cells.
[0003] NO is a free radical gas, which makes it reactive and unstable, thus NO is short lived in vivo, having a half life of 3-5 seconds under physiologic conditions. In the presence of oxygen, NO can combine with thiols to generate a biologically important class of stable NO adducts called S-nitrosothiols (SNO’s). This stable pool of NO has been postulated to act as a source of bioactive NO and as such appears to be critically important in health and disease, given the centrality of NO in cellular homeostasis (Stamler et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89:7674-7677 (1992)). Protein SNO’s play broad roles in the function of cardiovascular, respiratory, metabolic, gastrointestinal, immune, and central nervous system (Foster et al., Trends in Molecular Medicine, 9 (4): 160-168, (2003)). One of the most studied SNO’s in biological systems is S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) (Gaston et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 10957-10961 (1993)), an emerging key regulator in NO signaling since it is an efficient trans-nitrosating agent and appears to maintain an equilibrium with other S-nitrosated proteins (Liu et al., Nature, 410:490-494 (2001)) within cells. Given this pivotal position in the NO-SNO continuum, GSNO provides a therapeutically promising target to consider when NO modulation is pharmacologically warranted.
[0004] In light of this understanding of GSNO as a key regulator of NO homeostasis and cellular SNO levels, studies have focused on examining endogenous production of GSNO and SNO proteins, which occurs downstream from the production of the NO radical by the nitric oxide synthetase (NOS) enzymes. More recently there has been an increasing understanding of enzymatic catabolism of GSNO which has an important role in governing available concentrations of GSNO and consequently available NO and SNO’s.
[0005] Central to this understanding of GSNO catabolism, researchers have recently identified a highly conserved S-nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR) (Jensen et al., Biochem J., 331 :659-668 (1998); Liu et al., (2001)). GSNOR is also known as glutathione-dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase (GSH-FDH), alcohol dehydrogenase 3 (ADH-3) (Uotila and Koivusalo, Coenzymes and Coƒactors., D. Dolphin, ed. pp. 517-551 (New York, John Wiley & Sons, (1989)), and alcohol dehydrogenase 5 (ADH-5). Importantly GSNOR shows greater activity toward GSNO than other substrates (Jensen et al., (1998); Liu et al., (2001)) and appears to mediate important protein and peptide denitrosating activity in bacteria, plants, and animals. GSNOR appears to be the major GSNO-metabolizing enzyme in eukaryotes (Liu et al., (2001)). Thus, GSNO can accumulate in biological compartments where GSNOR activity is low or absent (e.g. , airway lining fluid) (Gaston et al., (1993)).
[0006] Yeast deficient in GSNOR accumulate S-nitrosylated proteins which are not substrates of the enzyme, which is strongly suggestive that GSNO exists in equilibrium with SNO-proteins (Liu et al., (2001)). Precise enzymatic control over ambient levels of GSNO and thus SNO-proteins raises the possibility that GSNO/GSNOR may play roles across a host of physiological and pathological functions including protection against nitrosative stress wherein NO is produced in excess of physiologic needs. Indeed, GSNO specifically has been implicated in physiologic processes ranging from the drive to breathe (Lipton et al., Nature, 413: 171-174 (2001)) to regulation of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (Zaman et al., Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 284:65-70 (2001)), to regulation of vascular tone, thrombosis, and platelet function (de Belder et al., Cardiovasc Res.; 28(5):691-4 (1994)), Z. Kaposzta, et al., Circulation; 106(24): 3057 – 3062, (2002)) as well as host defense (de Jesus-Berrios et al., Curr. Biol., 13: 1963-1968 (2003)). Other studies have found that GSNOR protects yeast cells against nitrosative stress both in vitro (Liu et al., (2001)) and in vivo (de Jesus-Berrios et al., (2003)).
[0007] Collectively, data suggest GSNO as a primary physiological ligand for the enzyme S-nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR), which catabolizes GSNO and
consequently reduces available SNO’s and NO in biological systems (Liu et al., (2001)), (Liu et al., Cell, 116(4), 617-628 (2004)), and (Que et al., Science, 308, (5728): 1618-1621 (2005)). As such, this enzyme plays a central role in regulating local and systemic bioactive NO. Since perturbations in NO bioavailability has been linked to the pathogenesis of numerous disease states, including hypertension, atherosclerosis, thrombosis, asthma, gastrointestinal disorders, inflammation, and cancer, agents that regulate GSNOR activity are candidate therapeutic agents for treating diseases associated with NO imbalance.
[0008] Nitric oxide (NO), S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), and S-nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR) regulate normal lung physiology and contribute to lung pathophysiology. Under normal conditions, NO and GSNO maintain normal lung physiology and function via their anti-inflammatory and bronchodilatory actions. Lowered levels of these mediators in pulmonary diseases such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may occur via up-regulation of GSNOR enzyme activity. These lowered levels of NO and GSNO, and thus lowered anti-inflammatory capabilities, are key events that contribute to pulmonary diseases and which can potentially be reversed via GSNOR inhibition.
[0009] S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) has been shown to promote repair and/or regeneration of mammalian organs, such as the heart (Lima et al., 2010), blood vessels (Lima et al., 2010) skin (Georgii et al., 2010), eye or ocular structures (Haq et al., 2007) and liver (Prince et al., 2010). S-nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR) is the major catabolic enzyme of GSNO. Inhibition of GSNOR is thought to increase endogenous GSNO.
[0010] Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD’s), including Crohn’s and ulcerative colitis, are chronic inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, in which NO, GSNO, and GSNOR can exert influences. Under normal conditions, NO and GSNO function to maintain normal intestinal physiology via anti-inflammatory actions and maintenance of the intestinal epithelial cell barrier. In IBD, reduced levels of GSNO and NO are evident and likely occur via up-regulation of GSNOR activity. The lowered levels of these mediators contribute to the pathophysiology of IBD via disruption of the epithelial barrier via dysregulation of proteins involved in maintaining epithelial tight junctions. This epithelial barrier dysfunction, with the ensuing entry of micro-organisms from the lumen, and the overall lowered anti-inflammatory capabilities in the presence of lowered NO and GSNO, are key events in IBD progression that can be potentially influenced by targeting GSNOR.
[0011] Cell death is the crucial event leading to clinical manifestation of
hepatotoxicity from drugs, viruses and alcohol. Glutathione (GSH) is the most abundant redox molecule in cells and thus the most important determinant of cellular redox status. Thiols in proteins undergo a wide range of reversible redox modifications during times of exposure to reactive oxygen and reactive nitrogen species, which can affect protein activity. The maintenance of hepatic GSH is a dynamic process achieved by a balance between rates of GSH synthesis, GSH and GSSG efflux, GSH reactions with reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species and utilization by GSH peroxidase. Both GSNO and GSNOR play roles in the regulation of protein redox status by GSH.
[0012] Acetaminophen overdoses are the leading cause of acute liver failure (ALF) in the United States, Great Britain and most of Europe. More than 100,000 calls to the U.S. Poison Control Centers, 56,000 emergency room visits, 2600 hospitalizations, nearly 500 deaths are attributed to acetaminophen in this country annually. Approximately, 60% recover without needing a liver transplant, 9% are transplanted and 30% of patients succumb to the illness. The acetaminophen-related death rate exceeds by at least three-fold the number of deaths due to all other idiosyncratic drug reactions combined (Lee, Hepatol Res 2008; 38 (Suppl. 1):S3-S8).
[0013] Liver transplantation has become the primary treatment for patients with fulminant hepatic failure and end-stage chronic liver disease, as well as certain metabolic liver diseases. Thus, the demand for transplantation now greatly exceeds the availability of donor organs, it has been estimated that more than 18 000 patients are currently registered with the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and that an additional 9000 patients are added to the liver transplant waiting list each year, yet less than 5000 cadaveric donors are available for transplantation.
[0014] Currently, there is a great need in the art for diagnostics, prophylaxis, ameliorations, and treatments for medical conditions relating to increased NO synthesis and/or increased NO bioactivity. In addition, there is a significant need for novel compounds, compositions, and methods for preventing, ameliorating, or reversing other NO-associated disorders. The present invention satisfies these needs.
Schemes 1-6 below illustrate general methods for preparing analogs.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
[00174] For a detailed example of General Scheme 1 see Compound IV-1 in Example 1.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
[00175] For a detailed example of Scheme 2, A conditions, see Compound IV-2 in Example 2.
[00176] For a detailed example of Scheme 2, B conditions, see Compound IV-8 in Example 8.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
[00177] For a detailed example of Scheme 3, see Compound IV-9 in Example 9.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
[00178] For a detailed example of Scheme 4, Route A, see Compound IV-11 in Example 11.
[00179] For a detailed example of Scheme 4, Route B, see Compound IV-12 in Example 12.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
[00180] For a detailed example of Scheme 5, Compound A, see Compound IV-33 in Example 33.
[00181] For a detailed example of Scheme 5, Compound B, see Compound IV-24 in Example 24.
[00182] For a detailed example of Scheme 5, Compound C, see Compound IV-23 in Example 23.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Example 8: Compound IV-8: 3-chloro-4-(6-hydroxyquinolin-2-yl)benzoic acid
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
[00209] Followed Scheme 2, B conditions:
[00210] Step 1: Synthesis of 3-chloro-4-(6-methoxyquinolin-2-yl)benzoic acid:
[00211] A mixture of 2-chloro-6-methoxyquinoline (Intermediate 1) (200 mg, 1.04 mmol), 4-carboxy-2-chlorophenylboronic acid (247 mg, 1.24 mmol) and K2CO3(369 mg, 2.70 mmol) in DEGME / H2O (7.0 mL / 2.0 mL) was degassed three times under N2 atmosphere. Then PdCl2(dppf) (75 mg, 0.104 mmol) was added and the mixture was heated to 110 °C for 3 hours under N2 atmosphere. The reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc (100 mL) and filtered. The filtrate was washed with brine (20 mL), dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated to give 3-chloro-4-(6-methoxyquinolin-2-yl)benzoic acid (150 mg, yield 46%) as a yellow solid, which was used for the next step without further purification.
[00212] Step 2: Synthesis of Compound IV-8: To a suspension of 3-chloro-4-(6-methoxyquinolin-2-yl)benzoic acid (150 mg, 0.479 mmol) in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was added AlCl3 (320 mg, 2.40 mmol). The reaction mixture was refluxed overnight. The mixture was quenched with saturated NH4Cl (10 mL) and the aqueous layer was extracted with CH2Cl2 / MeOH (v/v=10: l, 30 mL x3). The combined organic layer was washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated to give the crude product, which was purified by prep-HPLC (0.1% TFA as additive) to give 3-chloro-4-(6-hydroxyquinolin-2-yl)benzoic acid (25 mg, yield 18%). 1H NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz): δ 10.20 (brs, 1H), 8.30 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.10-8.00 (m, 2H), 7.95 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.72 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (dd, J = 6.4, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 7.22 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), MS (ESI): m/z 299.9 [M+H]+.
Percent Composition: C 70.58%, H 5.13%, N 5.49%, O 18.80%
Literature References: Prostaglandin biosynthesis inhibitor. Prepn and separation of isomers: BE856681; J. M. Muchowski, A. F. Kluge, US4089969 (both 1978 to Syntex). Alternate processes: J. M. Muchowski, R. Greenhouse, US4347186 (1982 to Syntex); F. Franco et al.,J. Org. Chem.47, 1682 (1982); J. B. Doherty, US4496741 (1985 to Merck & Co.). Absolute configuration: A. Guzman et al.,J. Med. Chem.29, 589 (1986). Structure-activity relationships: J. M. Muchowski et al.,ibid.28, 1037 (1985). Pharmacology and analgesic, anti-inflammatory profile of ketorolac and its tromethamine salt: W. H. Rooks et al.,Agents Actions12, 684 (1982); eidem,Drugs Exp. Clin. Res.11, 479 (1985). Clinical comparison with acetaminophen in post-operative pain: H. J. McQuay et al.,Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.39, 89 (1986).
Properties: Crystals from ethyl acetate + ether, mp 160-161°. uv max in methanol: 245, 312 nm (e 7080, 17400). pKa 3.49 ±0.02. LD50 orally in mice: ~200 mg/kg (Rooks).
Melting point: mp 160-161°
pKa: pKa 3.49 ±0.02
Absorption maximum: uv max in methanol: 245, 312 nm (e 7080, 17400)
Toxicity data: LD50 orally in mice: ~200 mg/kg (Rooks)
Ketorolac, sold under the brand name Toradol among others, is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) used to treat pain.[1]Specifically it is recommended for moderate to severe pain.[2] Recommended duration of treatment is less than six days.[1] It is used by mouth, by injection into a vein or muscle, and as eye drops.[1][2] Effects begin within an hour and last for up to eight hours.[1]
Ketorolac was patented in 1976 and approved for medical use in 1989.[4][1] It is avaliable as a generic medication.[2] In the United Kingdom it costs the NHS less than a £ per injectable dose as of 2019.[2] In the United States the wholesale cost of this amount is about 1.50 USD.[5] In 2016 it was the 296th most prescribed medication in the United States with more than a million prescriptions.[6]
Medical uses
Ketorolac is used for short-term management of moderate to severe pain.[7]It is usually not prescribed for longer than five days.[8][9][10][11] Ketorolac is effective when administered with paracetamol to control pain in neonates because it does not depress respiration as do opioids.[12] Ketorolac is also an adjuvant to opioid medications and improves pain relief. It is also used to treat dysmenorrhea.[11] Ketorolac is used to treat idiopathic pericarditis, where it reduces inflammation.[13]
Ketorolac is used for short-term pain control not lasting longer than five days, and can be administered orally, by intramuscular injection, intravenously, and by nasal spray.[8] Ketorolac is initially administered by intramuscular injection or intravenously.[7] Oral therapy is only used as a continuation from the intramuscular or intravenous starting point.[8][12]
Ketorolac is used during eye surgery help with pain.[14] Ketorolac is effective in treating ocular itching.[15] The ketorolac ophthalmic formulation is associated with a decreased development of macular edema after cataract surgery and is more effective alone rather than as an opioid/ketorolac combination treatment.[16][17] Ketorolac has also been used to manage pain from corneal abrasions.[18]
During treatment with ketorolac, clinicians monitor for the manifestation of adverse effects and side effects. Lab tests, such as liver function tests, bleeding time, BUN, serum creatinine and electrolyte levels are often used and help to identify potential complications.[8][9]
The practice of restricting treatment with ketorolac is due to its potential to cause kidney damage.[20]
Interactions
Ketorolac can interact with other medications. Probenecid can increase the probability of having an adverse reaction or experiencing a side effect when taken with ketorolac. Pentoxifylline can increase the risk of bleeding. When aspirin is taken at the same time as ketorolac, the effectiveness is decreased. Problematic GI effects are additive and become more likely if potassium supplements, aspirin, other NSAIDS, corticosteroids, or alcohol is taken at the same time. The effectiveness of antihypertensives and diuretics can be lowered. The use of ketorolac can increase serum lithium levels to the point of toxicity. Toxicity to methotrexate is more likely if ketorolac is taken at the same time. The risk of bleeding increases with the concurrent medications clopidogrel, cefoperazone, valproic acid, cefotetan, eptifibatide, tirofiban, and copidine. Anticoagulants and thrombolytic medications also increase the likelihood of bleeding. Medications used to treat cancer can interact with ketorolac along with radiation therapy. The risk of toxicity to the kidneys increases when ketorolac is taken with cyclosporine.[8][9]
The primary mechanism of action responsible for ketorolac’s anti-inflammatory, antipyretic and analgesic effects is the inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis by competitive blocking of the enzymecyclooxygenase (COX). Ketorolac is a non-selective COX inhibitor.[21] Ketorolac has been assessed to be a relatively higher risk NSAID when compared to aceclofenac, celecoxib, and ibuprofen.[13] It is considered a first-generation NSAID.[19]
History
In the US, ketorolac was the only widely available intravenous NSAID for many years; an IV form of paracetemol, which is not an NSAID, became available in Europe in 2009 and then in the US.[12]
In 2007, there were concerns about the high incidence of reported side effects. This led to restriction in its dosage and maximum duration of use. In the UK, treatment was initiated only in a hospital, although this was not designed to exclude its use in prehospital care and mountain rescue settings.[7] Dosing guidelines were published at that time.[22]
Concerns over the high incidence of reported side effects with ketorolac trometamol led to its withdrawal (apart from the ophthalmic formulation) in several countries, while in others its permitted dosage and maximum duration of treatment have been reduced. From 1990 to 1993, 97 reactions with a fatal outcome were reported worldwide.[23]
The eye-drop formulation was approved by the FDA in 1992.[24] An intranasal formulation was approved by the FDA in 2010[25] for short-term management of moderate to moderately severe pain requiring analgesia at the opioid level.
Synthesis
DOI: 10.1021/jo00348a014
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
1H-Pyrrolizine-1-carboxylic acid, 2,3-dihydro-5-benzoyl-, (+-)-, could be produced through many synthetic methods.
Following is one of the reaction routes:
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
2-Methylthiopyrrole (I) is benzoylated with N,N-dimethylbenzamide (II) to produce 5-benzoyl-2-methylthiopyrrole (III) in the presence of POCl3 in refluxing CH2Cl2, and the yielding product is condensed with spiro[2.5]-5,7-dioxa-6,6-dimethyloctane-4,8-dione (IV) in the presence of NaH in DMF giving compound (V). The oxidation of (V) with m-chloroperbenzoic acid in CH2Cl2affords the sulfone (VI), which is submitted to methanolysis with methanol and HCl giving 1-(3,3-dimethoxycarbonylpropyl)-2-methanesulfonyl-5-benzoylpyrrole (VII). The cyclization of (VII) with NaH in DMF yields dimethyl 5-benzoyl-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1,1-dicarboxylate (VIII), which is finally hydrolyzed and decarboxylated with KOH in refluxing methanol.Compound (III) can be oxidized with m-chloroperbenzoic acid as before giving 2-methanesulfonyl-5-benzoylpyrrole (IX), which is then condensed with spiro compound (IV) as before to afford compound (VI), already obtained.
SYN
DE 2731678; ES 460706; ES 470214; FR 2358406; FR 2375234; GB 1554075
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
The condensation of dimethylacetone-1,3-dicarboxylate (X) with ethanolamine (XI) yields methyl 3-(methoxycarbonylmethyl)-3-(2-hydroxyethylamino)acrylate (XII), which is cyclized with bromoacetaldehyde diethylacetal (XIII) affording methyl 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-3-methoxycarbonylpyrrol-2-acetate (XIV). Acylation of (XIV) with methanesulfonyl chloride (XV) and triethylamine in CH2Cl2 yields the corresponding mesylate (XVI), which by treatment with methyl iodide in refluxing acetonitrile is converted into methyl 1-(2-iodoethyl)-3-methoxycarbonylpyrrole-2-acetate (XVII). The cyclization of (XVII) with NaH in DMF yields dimethyl 1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1,7-dicarboxylate (XVIII), which is hydrolyzed with KOH in refluxing methanol – water to the corresponding diacid (XIX). Partial esterification of (XIX) with isopropanol and HCl gives isopropyl 1,2-dihydro-3H-7-carboxypyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-carboxylate (XX), which is decarboxylated by heating at 270 C affording isopropyl 1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-carboxylate (XXI). Benzoylation of (XXI) with N,N-dimethylbenzamide (XXII) and POCl3 in refluxing CH2Cl2 yields isopropyl 5-benzoyl-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-carboxylate (XXIII), which is finally hydrolyzed with K2CO3 or NaOH in methanol – water.
SYN2
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
The benzoylation of 2-methylthiopyrrole (I) with N,N-dimethylbenzamide (II) by means of POCl3 in refluxing CH2Cl2 gives 5-benzoyl-2-methylthiopyrrole (III), which is condensed with spiro[2.5]-5,7-dioxa-6,6-dimethyloctane-4,8-dione (IV) by means of NaH in DMF yielding compound (V). The oxidation of (V) with m-chloroperbenzoic acid in CH2Cl2 affords the sulfone (VI), which is submitted to methanolysis with methanol and HCl giving 1-(3,3-dimethoxycarbonylpropyl)-2-methanesulfonyl-5-benzoylpyrrole (VII). The cyclization of (VII) with NaH in DMF yields dimethyl 5-benzoyl-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1,1-dicarboxylate (VIII), which is finally hydrolyzed and decarboxylated with KOH in refluxing methanol. Compound (III) can be oxidized with m-chloroperbenzoic acid as before giving 2-methanesulfonyl-5-benzoylpyrrole (IX), which is then condensed with spiro compound (IV) as before to afford compound (VI), already obtained.
^Wakai A, Lawrenson JG, Lawrenson AL, Wang Y, Brown MD, Quirke M, Ghandour O, McCormick R, Walsh CD, Amayem A, Lang E, Harrison N (2017). “Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for analgesia in traumatic corneal abrasions”. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 5: CD009781. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009781.pub2. PMID28516471.
^Lee, I. O.; Seo, Y. (2008). “The Effects of Intrathecal Cyclooxygenase-1, Cyclooxygenase-2, or Nonselective Inhibitors on Pain Behavior and Spinal Fos-Like Immunoreactivity”. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 106 (3): 972–977, table 977 contents. doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e318163f602. PMID18292448.
^MHRA Drug Safety Update October 2007, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 3-4.
^Committee on the Safety of Medicines, Medicines Control Agency: Ketorolac: new restrictions on dose and duration of treatment. Current Problems in Pharmacovigilance:June 1993; Volume 19 (pages 5-8).
SRT-1720, also known as CAY10559 and is a drug developed by Sirtris Pharmaceuticals intended as a small-molecule activator of the sirtuin subtype SIRT1. It has similar activity in the body to the known SIRT1 activator resveratrol, but is 1000x more potent. In animal studies it was found to improve insulin sensitivity and lower plasma glucose levels in fat, muscle and liver tissue, and increased mitochondrial and metabolic function. A study of SRT1720 conducted by the National Institute on Aging found that the drug may extend the lifespan of obese mice by 44% .
In animal models of obesity and diabetes SRT1720 was found to improve insulin sensitivity and lower plasma glucose levels in fat, muscle and liver tissue, and increase mitochondrial and metabolic function.[1] In mice rendered obese and diabetic by feeding a high-fat, high-sugar diet, a study performed at the National Institute of Aging found that feeding chow infused with the highest dose of SRT1720 beginning at one year of age increased mean lifespan by 18%, and maximum lifespan by 5%, as compared to other short-lived obese, diabetic mice; however, treated animals still lived substantially shorter lives than normal-weight mice fed normal chow with no drug.[2] In a later study, SRT1720 increased mean lifespan of obese, diabetic mice by 21.7%, similar to the earlier study, but there was no effect on maximum lifespan in this study.[3] In normal-weight mice fed a standard rodent diet, SRT1720 increased mean lifespan by just 8.8%, and again had no effect on maximum lifespan.[3]
Since the discovery of SRT1720, the claim that this compound is a SIRT1 activator has been questioned[4][5][6] and further defended.[7][8]
Although SRT1720 is not currently undergoing clinical development, a related compound, SRT2104, is currently in clinical development for metabolic diseases.[9]
PAPER
Letters in Drug Design & Discovery, 10(9), 793-797; 2013
The Identification of the SIRT1 Activator SRT2104 as a Clinical Candidate
Author(s):Pui Yee Ng, Jean E. Bemis, Jeremy S. Disch, Chi B. Vu, Christopher J. Oalmann, Amy V. Lynch,David P. Carney, Thomas V. Riera, Jeffrey Song, Jesse J. Smith, Siva Lavu, Angela Tornblom, Meghan Duncan, Marie Yeager, Kristina Kriksciukaite, Akanksha Gupta, Vipin Suri, Peter J. Elliot, Jill C. Milne, Joseph J. Nunes, Michael R. Jirousek, George P. Vlasuk, James L. Ellis, Robert B. Perni.
A series of imidazo[1,2-b]thiazole derivatives is shown to activate the NAD+-dependent deacetylase SIRT1, a potential new therapeutic target to treat various metabolic disorders. This series of compounds was derived from a high throughput screening hit bearing an oxazolopyridine core. Water-solubilizing groups could be installed conveniently at either the C-2 or C-3 position of the imidazo[1,2-b]thiazole ring. The SIRT1 enzyme activity could be adjusted by modifying the amide portion of these imidazo[1,2-b]thiazole derivatives. The most potent analogue within this series, namely, compound 29, has demonstrated oral antidiabetic activity in the ob/ob mouse model, the diet-induced obesity (DIO) mouse model, and the Zucker fa/fa rat model.
Discovery of Imidazo[1,2-b]thiazole Derivatives as Novel SIRT1 Activators
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Phone: (617)-252-6920, extension 2129. Fax: (617)-252-6924. E-mail: cvu@sirtrispharma.com., †
Present address: Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of California—San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Preparation of N-(2-(3-(Piperazin-1-ylmethyl)imidazo[2,1-b]thiazol-6-yl)phenyl)quinoxaline-2-carboxamide (29)
Essentially the same procedure as detailed in the preparation of 3,4,5-trimethoxy-N-(2-(3-(piperazin-1-ylmethyl)imidazo[2,1-b]thiazol-6-yl)phenyl)benzamide was employed except that 2-quinoxaloyl chloride was used.
^Beher D; Wu J; Cumine S; Kim KW; Lu SC; Atangan L; Wang M (December 2009). “Resveratrol is not a direct activator of SIRT1 enzyme activity”. Chem Biol Drug Des. 74 (6): 619–24. doi:10.1111/j.1747-0285.2009.00901.x. PMID19843076.
^Zarse, K.; Schmeisser, S.; Birringer, M.; Falk, E.; Schmoll, D.; Ristow, M. (2010). “Differential Effects of Resveratrol and SRT1720 on Lifespan of AdultCaenorhabditis elegans”. Hormone and Metabolic Research. 42 (12): 837–839. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1265225. PMID20925017.
Aclimostat, also known as ZGN-1061, is an anti-diabetic, anti-obesity MetAP2 inhibitor.
Over 1.1 billion people worldwide are reported to be overweight. Obesity is estimated to affect over 90 million people in the United States alone. Twenty-five percent of the population in the United States over the age of twenty is considered clinically obese. While being overweight or obese presents problems (for example restriction of mobility, discomfort in tight spaces such as theater or airplane seats, social difficulties, etc.), these conditions, in particular clinical obesity, affect other aspects of health, i.e., diseases and other adverse health conditions associated with, exacerbated by, or precipitated by being overweight or obese. The estimated mortality from obesity-related conditions in the United States is over 300,000 annually (O’Brien et al. Amer J Surgery (2002) 184:4S-8S; and Hill et al. (1998) Science, 280:1371). [0003] There is no curative treatment for being overweight or obese. Traditional pharmacotherapies for treating an overweight or obese subject, such as serotonin and noradrenergic re-uptake inhibitors, noradrenergic re-uptake inhibitors, selective serotonin re- uptake inhibitors, intestinal lipase inhibitors, or surgeries such as stomach stapling or gastric banding, have been shown to provide minimal short-term benefits or significant rates of relapse, and have further shown harmful side-effects to patients. [0004] MetAP2 encodes a protein that functions at least in part by enzymatically removing the amino terminal methionine residue from certain newly translated proteins such as glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Warder et al. (2008) J. Proteome Res.7:4807). Increased expression of the MetAP2 gene has been historically associated with various forms of cancer. Molecules inhibiting the enzymatic activity of MetAP2 have been identified and have been explored for their utility in the treatment of various tumor types (Wang et al. (2003) Cancer Res.63:7861) and infectious diseases such as microsporidiosis, leishmaniasis, and malaria (Zhang et al. (2002) J. Biomed. Sci.9:34). Notably, inhibition of MetAP2 activity in obese and obese-diabetic animals leads to a reduction in body weight in part by increasing the oxidation of fat and in part by reducing the consumption of food (Rupnick et al. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:10730).
[0005] Such MetAP2 inhibitors may be useful as well for patients with excess adiposity and conditions related to adiposity including type 2 diabetes, hepatic steatosis, and
cardiovascular disease (via e.g. ameliorating insulin resistance, reducing hepatic lipid content, and reducing cardiac workload). Accordingly, compounds capable of modulating MetAP2 are needed to address the treatment of obesity and related diseases as well as other ailments favorably responsive to MetAP2 modulator treatment.
[00312] To a mixture of 4-(2-(azetidin-3-yl)ethyl)morpholine, trifluoroacetate (2.33 g, 3.7 mmol) in CH3CN (150 mL) was added DIPEA (2.9 mL, 17 mmol) drop-wise at 0-5oC. The mixture was then stirred at 0-5oC for 10 min, and carbonate Intermediate 1 (1.3 g, 2.9 mmol) was added to the mixture in portions at 0oC under a N2atmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred at 25oC for 16 hrs. TLC (PE : EtOAc = 3 : 1) showed that the reaction was complete. The solvent was removed under vacuum below 40oC. The residue was diluted with DCM (60 mL), and the DCM solution was washed with ammonium acetate buffer (pH~4, 15 mL x 2). The combined aqueous layers were back-extracted with DCM (20 mL x 2). The combined organic layers were washed with aq. NaHCO3 solution (15 mL x 2, 5% wt), dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (DCM: MeOH=100: 0~60: 1), followed by preparative HPLC (Method A, H2O (0.1% FA) / CH3CN) gave the title compound (1.15 g) as a light yellow syrup. LC-MS: m/z = 479 [M+H]+; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.43 (br, 1H), 5.13 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.87-4.15 (m, 2H), 3.63-3.65 (m, 4H), 3.52- 3.56 (m, 3H), 3.49 (s, 3H), 2.90 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H), 2.46-2.54 (m, 3H), 2.19-2.36 (m, 7H), 1.97-2.13 (m, 2H), 1.78-1.89 (m, 5H), 1.73 (s, 3H), 1.62 (s, 3H), 1.13 (s, 3H), 0.99 (d, J = 13.6 Hz, 1H).
REFERENCES
1: Malloy J, Zhuang D, Kim T, Inskeep P, Kim D, Taylor K. Single and multiple dose evaluation of a novel MetAP2 inhibitor: Results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Aug;20(8):1878-1884. doi: 10.1111/dom.13305. Epub 2018 Apr 23. PubMed PMID: 29577550; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6055687.
2: Burkey BF, Hoglen NC, Inskeep P, Wyman M, Hughes TE, Vath JE. Preclinical Efficacy and Safety of the Novel Antidiabetic, Antiobesity MetAP2 Inhibitor ZGN-1061. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2018 May;365(2):301-313. doi: 10.1124/jpet.117.246272. Epub 2018 Feb 28. PubMed PMID: 29491038.
BI 882370 is a highly potent and selective RAF inhibitor that binds to the DFG-out (inactive) conformation of the BRAF kinase. BI 882370 inhibits proliferation of human BRAF-mutant melanoma cells with 100× higher potency (1-10 nmol/L) than vemurafenib.
Xynomic, under license from Boehringer Ingelheim , is investigating for treating BRAF mutant cancers, including colorectal cancer and melanoma; in October 2017, preclinical data were reported in the melanoma and colorectal cancer settings.
Novel crystalline salts (monosuccinate salt), designated as Form A, of BI-882370 and their substantially anhydrous and non-solvated, processes for their preparation and compositions comprising them. Also claimed are their use as a RAF kinase Inhibitor, for the treatment of cancers and other diseases, such as infections, inflammations and autoimmune diseases.
The compound N-(3-(5-((l -ethylpiperidin-4-yl)(methyl)andno)-3-(pyrimidin-5-yl)-lH-pyrrolo [3, 2-Z>]pyri din- l-yl)-2,4-difluorophenyl)propane-l -sulfonamide (BI 882370), having Formula I:
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
I
is a RAF kinase inhibitor useful in the treatment of various diseases including cancer. The compound of Formula I, as well as its preparation and use, have been described in
WO/2012/104388, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The RAS-RAF-MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) signaling pathway plays a critical role in transmitting proliferation signals generated by the cell surface receptors and cytoplasmic signaling elements to the nucleus. Constitutive activation of this pathway is involved in malignant transformation by several oncogenes. Activating mutations in RAS
occur in approximately 15 % of cancers, and recent data has shown that B-RAF is mutated in about 7% of cancers (Wellbrock et al, “The RAF proteins take centre stage”, Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2004, 5, 875-885), identifying it as another important oncogene in this pathway. In mammals, the RAF family of serine/threonine kinases comprises three members: A-RAF, B-RAF and C-RAF. However, activating mutations have so far been only identified in B-RAF underlining the importance of this isoform. It is believed that B-RAF is the main isoform that couples RAS to MEK, and that C-RAF and A-RAF signal to ERK only to fine-tune cellular responses (Wellbrock et al. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol, 2004, 5, 875-885). The most common cancer mutation in B-RAF results in a valine to glutamic acid exchange at position 600 of the protein (V600E), which dramatically enhances B-RAF activity, presumably because its negative charge mimics activation loop phosphorylation (Wan et al , “Mechanism of activation of the RAF-ERK signaling pathway by oncogenic mutations of B-RAF”, Cell, 2004, 116, 855-867). The highest incidence of B-RAF V600 mutations occurs in malignant melanoma (39%), thyroid cancer (46%), colorectal cancer (10%), biliary tract cancer (10%), prostate cancer (4%), ovary cancer (3%) and non-small cell lung cancer (2%), but they also occur at a low frequency in a wide variety of other cancers (frequencies of mutations according to COSMIC (Catalogue Of Somatic Mutations In Cancer; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute) release v.53, 15th May 2011 ;
http://www.sanger.ac.uk/genetics/CGP/cosmic/). Literature supported the hypothesis that B-RA 600E mutated tumor cells seem to rely heavily on the continued activation of this pathway – a phenomenon termed “oncogene addiction” – whereas normal B-RAFwt cells use a broader range of signals. This provides an Achilles’ heel that can be exploited
therapeutically by treating patients with somatically mutated B-RAFV600E using orally available B-RAF inhibitors.
The key role of B-RAF V600E in aberrant ERK signaling and consequently oncogenesis has been demonstrated in several independent experimental approaches such as
overexpression of oncogenic/mutated B-RAF in vitro and in vivo (Wan et al., Cell, 2004, 116, 855-867; Wellbrock et al, Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 2338-2342), siRNA knock-down in vitro (Karasarides et al., Oncogene, “V599EB-RAF is an oncogene in melanocytes”, 2004, 23, 6292-6298) or in inducible short-hairpin RNA xenograft models where gain-of-function B-RAF signaling was found to be strongly associated with in vivo tumorigenicity (Hoeflich et al, “Oncogenic BRAF is required for tumor growth and maintenance in melanoma models”, Cancer Res., 2006, 66, 999-1006).
Treatment of B-RAFV600E mutated melanoma or colon carcinoma cells induces a B-RAF inhibition phenotype (e.g. reduction of phospho-MEK and phospho-ERK levels, reduction of cyclin D expression and induction of p27 expression). Consequently, these cells are locked in the Gl -phase of the cell cycle and do not proliferate.
Clinical proof of mechanism and proof of concept has been established for treating in cancer in B-RAFV600E mutated melanoma patients treated with Zelboraf®, B-RAF inhibitor (PLX-4032, vemurafenib, from Plexxikon/Daiichi Sankyo/Roche. Bollag et al., “Clinical efficacy of a RAF inhibitor needs broad target blockade in BRAF-mutant melanoma”, Nature, 2010, 467(7315), 596-9.; Flaherty et al, New Engl. J. Med., “Inhibition of Mutated, Activated BRAF in Metastatic Melanoma”, 2010, 363, 809-819; Chapman et al. “Improved Survival with Vemurafenib in Melanoma with BRAF V600E Mutation”, New Engl. J. Med, 2011, 364:2507-2516. Favorable response rates were observed in both Phase I and Phase III clinical trials. It was reported, that melanoma patients carrying a B-RAFV600K mutation also do respond to therapy (Rubinstein et al, “Incidence of the V600K mutation among melanoma patients with BRAF mutations, and potential therapeutic response to the specific BRAF inhibitor PLX4032”, J. Transl. Med , 2010, 8, 67).
The most frequent B-RAF mutation is the exchange at amino acid position 600 from valine to glutamate with more than 90% frequency of all B-RAF mutations (Wellbrock et al. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol, 2004, 5, 875-885), the second most frequent mutation is an alteration from valine to lysine, other mutations were found with lower frequency at that position (Wellbrock et al. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol, 2004, 5, 875-885 and frequencies of mutations according to COSMIC (Catalogue Of Somatic Mutations In Cancer; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute) release v53, 15th May 2011 ;
http://www.sanger.ac.uk/genetics/CGP/cosmic/). Additional mutations were found at e.g. the glycine rich loop (Wellbrock et al. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol, 2004, 5, 875-885). Not all of these rather rare mutations seem to lead to direct activation of B-RAF (Wan et al. ,
“Mechanism of activation of the RAF-ERK signaling pathway by oncogenic mutations of B-RAF”, Cell, 2004, 116, 855-867).
The compound of Formula I is a highly potent and selective RAF inhibitor that binds to the DFG-out (inactive) conformation of the B-RAF kinase. The compound inhibited proliferation of human B-RAF-mutant melanoma cells with 100 times higher potency (1-10 nmol/L) than vemurafenib, whereas wild-type cells were not affected at 1,000 nmol/L. A solution of the compound administered orally was efficacious in mouse models of B-RAF-mutant melanomas and colorectal carcinomas, and at 25 mg/kg twice daily showed superior efficacy compared with vemurafenib, dabrafenib, or trametinib. The compound was also active in A375 melanoma-bearing mice that were resistant to vemurafenib, particularly when dosed in combination with trametinib. Mice treated with the compound did not show any body weight loss or clinical signs of intolerability, and no pathologic changes were observed in several major organs investigated, including skin. Furthermore, in a pilot study in rats (up to 60 mg/kg daily for 2 weeks), the compound lacked toxicity in terms of clinical chemistry, hematology, pathology, and toxicogenomics. These results are described in Waizenegger et al., Mol. Cancer Ther., 2016, 75(3); 354-65, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
For the manufacture, purification, and formulation of a drug, it may be advantageous to employ a form of the drug having superior stability or other desirable formulation property exhibited by, for example, one or more salt or crystalline forms of the drug. Formation of salts of basic or acidic drugs can sometimes provide forms of the drug that have
advantageous properties such as solubility, non-hygroscopicity, crystallinity, and other physical properties that advantageous for formulating the drug. On the other hand, discovering a suitable salt or other crystalline form that is suitable for formulation is difficult, since there are numerous variables in the formation of a salt or crystalline form. These include the existence of numerous possible acids and bases that might be used as a counter-ion, various stoichiometric ratios that may be possible for combining a given basic or acid drug with an acid or base counter-ion, a wide variety of solvents and solvent systems
(including combinations of solvents) that potentially can be used to attempt to form salts or crystalline forms, and a variety of conditions (such as temperature or heating or cooling conditions) under which salts or crystalline forms may be generated. All of these variables of which may affect the properties of the salts or crystalline forms that might be obtained. Salts or solid forms may also have a variety of properties that render them unsuitable for drug development and formulation such as lack of crystallinity (amorphous forms), the presence or formation of multiple crystalline forms, which may interconvert and/or have different properties (polymorphism), lack of aqueous solubility, hygroscopicity, or stickiness of the solid. Furthermore, the formation of salts and crystalline forms and their properties are generally very unpredictable.
Accordingly, the crystalline salt forms of the compound of Formula I provided herein help satisfy the ongoing need for the development of a RAF kinase inhibitor for the treatment of serious diseases.
Preparation of A^-(3-(5-((l-ethylpiperidin-4-yl)(methyl)amino)-3-(pyrimidin-5-yl)-lH-pyrrolo[3,2-Z>]pyridin-l- amide (BI 882370)
DIPEA (62.82 mL, 0.435 mol) is added to the solution of 6-chloro-3-nitro-2-methylpyridine (1) (50 g, 290 mmol) and N-Boc-piperazine (2) (53.95 g, 290 mmol) in dry MeCN (200 mL) and stirred for 4 h at 50 °C. After the reaction is finished the reaction mixture is diluted with MeCN and water and stirred for 30 min. The precipitated product is collected by filtration, washed with water and the solid is dried in vacuo.
To a stirred solution of 4-(6-methyl-5-nitro-pyridin-2-yl)-piperazine- 1-carboxylic acid tert-butyl ester (3) (13 g, 40.3 mmol) in DMF (35 mL) is added N,N-dimethylformamide dimethylacetal (14.47 g, 121 mmol) and stirred in argon atmosphere for 36 h at 90 °C.
Additional 1.5 eq. of N^V-dimethylformamide dimethylacetal is added and stirred for 12 h at 90 °C. The reaction mixture is poured into water and extracted with DCM. The combined organic layers are washed with water, dried over anhydrous Na2S04 and concentrated in vacuo. The residue is used without further purification for the next step.
4-[6-((i?)-2-Dimethylairdno-vinyl)-5-nitro-pyridin-2-yl]-piperazine-l-carboxylic acid tert-butyl ester (36.4 g, 96 mmol) is taken up in MeOH, Pd/C (0.56 g, 10 %) is added and the mixture is hydrogenated in an autoclave at 60 psi for 16 h. The reaction mixture is filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue is purified by column chromatography viaNP MPLC. The product containing fractions of compound (5) (HPLC-MS method B: tRet. = 1.55 min.; MS (M+H)+ = 303) are combined and evaporated in vacuo.
Compound (6) (55.0 g, 254 mmol) is taken-up in MeOH (1.0 L). Pd/C (10.0 g, 10 %) is added and the mixture is hydrogenated in an autoclave at 200 psi for 3 h. The reaction mixture is filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue is purified by NP-MPLC on silica gel using DCM/MeOH (96:4) as eluent. The product containing fractions of the aniline intermediate (HPLC-MS method B: tRet. = 0.25 min.; MS (M-H)“ = 185) are combined and evaporated.
To the aniline intermediate (35.0 g, 188 mmol) in DCM (100 mL) pyridine (6.6 mL, 75 mmol) and ^-propane sulfonyl chloride (8) (29.5 mL, 263 mmol) are added and the mixture is stirred at rt for 16 h. The reaction mixture is diluted with EtOAc (200 mL), washed with H2O and HC1 (aq., 1 N) and the layers are separated, dried over MgS04 and evaporated to yield the sulfonamide (9) which was used without further purification.
Step 6. N-
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
9 10
The sulfonylated aniline (9) (38.0 g, 130 mmol) is taken-up in EtOH (250 mL), H2O (200 mL) and concentrated hydrochloric acid (200 mL) and heated to 80 °C for 2 h. The reaction mixture is concentrated under reduced pressure, aqueous NaOH (4 N) is added until pH = 6 is reached and the mixture is extracted 2 x with DCM. The combined organic layer is washed with brine, dried over MgS04, filtered and evaporated to yield the deacylated aniline (10) (HPLC-MS method B: tRet. = 0.22 min.; MS (M-H)“ = 249) as a hydrochloride which was used without further purification.
The hydrochloride of compound (10) is taken-up in DCM and extracted with NaHCCb solution. The organic layer is dried over MgSCn, filtered and evaporated. To the free base (10) (3.55 g, 14.21 mmol) in TFA (80 mL) at 0 °C is added NaNC (1.96 g, 28.4 mmol) in small portions and the mixture is stirred for 30 min. KI (23.83 g, 142 mmol) is added and stirring is continued for additional 15 min. The reaction mixture is diluted with Et^O and stirred for 1 h. Na2S203 solution (semiconc.) is added and the mixture is extracted 3 x with Et20. The combined organic layer is dried over MgSCn, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The residue is purified by column chromatography via NP-MPLC. The product containing fractions of compound (11) (HPLC-MS method A: tRet. = 1.58 min.; MS (M-H)“ = 360) are combined and evaporated in vacuo.
(1.91 mL, 12.1 mmol) and CS2CO3 (29.6 g, 90.85 mmol) are taken-up in dry toluene (3 mL) and the resulting mixture is flushed with argon and stirred for 16 h at 120 °C. After the addition of further Cul (576 mg, 3.03 mmol), trans-(\R,2R)-N,N’-bismet y 1-1,2-cyclohexandiamine (1.91 mL, 12.1 mmol) and CS2CO3 (20.0 g, 60.0 mmol) the reaction mixture is stirred for further 24 h. The solvent is removed in vacuo, the residue is taken up in DCM and extracted with NaHCC solution (semiconc). The organic layer is dried over MgS04, filtered, the solvent is removed in vacuo and the residue is purified viaNP-MPLC. The product containing fractions of (12) (HPLC-MS method C: teet. = 1.62 mia; MS (M+H)+ = 564) are combined and the solvent is removed in vacuo.
To a solution of sulfonamide (12) (1.078 g, 1.9 mmol) in DMF (4 mL)/THF (100 μί) is added NIS (474 mg, 2.1 mmol) and the mixture is stirred for 1 h at rt. The reaction mixture is diluted with 30 mL DCM and extracted with NaHCCb solution (semiconc). The combined organic layer is dried over MgSCn, filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue is purified by column chromatography via RP HPLC. The product containing fractions of (13) (HPLC-MS method B: tRet. = 2.035 mia; MS (M+H)+ = 688) are freeze dried.
Sulfonamide (13) (770 mg, 1.12 mmol), pyrimidin-5-yl-boronic acid (14) (194 mg, 1.57 mmol), Pd(dppf)Cl2 (82 mg, 0.11 mmol), LiCl (142 mg, 3.35 mmol) and Na2C03 (294 mg, 2.8 mmol) are taken-up in dioxane/LhO (2: 1 mixture, 12 mL), and the resulting mixture is flushed with argon and stirred for 1 h at 100 °C. The reaction mixture is diluted with DCM and extracted with NaHCCb solution (semi-concentrated). The organic layer is dried over MgS04, filtered, Isolute® is added, the solvent is removed in vacuo and the residue is purified via RP HPLC. The product containing fractions of (15) (HPLC-MS method C: tRet. = 2.149 min.; MS (M+H)+ = 642) are freeze dried.
To a solution of example compound (15) (154 mg, 0.24 mmol) in DCM/MeOH (1 : 1, 4 mL) is added HC1 (in dioxane, 4 N, 2 mL) and the mixture is stirred for 3 h at rt. The solvent is removed in vacuo. Obtained compound (16) (HPLC-MS method B: tRet. = 1.02 min.; MS (M+H)+ = 542) is used without further purification.
Compound I was obtained from compound (16) by reductive alkylation with acetaldehyde (40% in iPrOH) in the presence of 1.5 eq. sodium acetoxyborohydride in iPrOH. The crude product was recrystallized from ethanol to obtain the title compound in 84% yield.
Scale-Up Synthesis of A/-(3-(5-((l-ethylpiperidin-4-yl)(methyl)amino)-3-(pyrimidin-5-yl)-lH-pyrrolo[3,2-Z>]pyridin-l-yl)-2,4-difluorophenyl)propane- 1-sulfonamide (BI 882370)
Isopropanol (8.83 kg) and compound (15) (1.80 kg, 2.8 mol) were added into a reactor, and the mixture was stirred and heated to 55-60 °C. Concentrated hydrochloric acid (2.76 kg, 28 mol) was dropped into the reactor over than 20 min. at 60-65 °C. Then, the reaction mass was heated to 60-70 °C and held for 1 h. The conversion was monitored by HPLC, and reached about 99.5% after about 1 h.
The reaction mass was cooled and the isopropanol was removed by distillation under reduced pressure at not more than 50 °C. A brown oil was obtained, dissolved into water (6.75 kg) and washed by extraction with ethyl acetate (2.02 kg) at 20-30 °C. The water-phase was cooled to 15-20 °C. The pH was adjusted to 8.0-8.5 with 10% aqueous NaOH solution (-8.0 kg) at 20-30°C. The mixture was stirred for 3-4h at 20-30°C with the pH adjusted to 8.0-8.5 by addition of 10% NaOH solution every half-hour. The product was isolated by filtration and the cake washed with water (3.6 kg). The solid was dried under vacuum at 45-50 until the water content was not more than 5.5%. This provided about 1.64 kg of crude compound (16) (yield 108% of theoretical; the crude product containing water and NaCl detected). The crude product was used directly).
Bl 878426 Bl 882370 Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Process:
Dichloromethane (19.88 kg) and compound (16) (1.5kg, 2.77mol) were added into a reactor, and the mixture was stirred and cooled to 0-10°C under a nitrogen atmosphere. Sodium triacetoxyborohydride (95%, 0.93 kg, 4.16 mol) was added into the mixture at 0-10°C. The mixture was stirred for 20-30 min. at 0- 10°C. Acetaldehyde in DCM (40%,
1.07 kg, 9.71 mol) added into the mixture slowly over 2 h at 0-10 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred at 0-10 °C under a nitrogen atmosphere for 0.5-lh. The conversion was monitored by HPLC, and reached about 99.5% after about 0.5-1 h.
Water (15 kg) was added into the reaction mass at a temperature below 15 °C. The mixture was stirred at 15-30 °C for 20-30 min. Aqueous ammonia (25%, 1.13 kg, 16.61 mol) was added into the mixture and the mixture was then stirred for 0.5 h. The organic phase was separated and then washed by extraction with water (15 kg) at 20-25 °C. Activated charcoal (0.15 kg) was added into the organic phase. The mixture was stirred for 1 h and then filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure at not more than 40°C, and compound (I) (1.58 kg, 100% yield) was obtained as a foamy solid.
Investigation of the Crystallinity of iV-(3-(5-((l-Ethylpiperidin-4-yl)(methyl)amino)-3-(pyrimidin-5-yl)- lH-pyrrolo [3,2-Z>] pyridin- l-yl)-2,4-difluorophenyl)propane- 1-sulfonamide Free Base
Investigation of the crystallinity of N-(3-(5-((l-ethylpiperidin-4-yl)(methyl)amino)-3-(py rimidin-5-y 1)- lH-pyrrolo[3 ,2-b] pyridin- 1 -y l)-2,4-difluoropheny l)propane- 1 -sulfonamide free base, obtained by recrystallization from aqueous ethanol, which was used as a starting material to investigate salt formation showed that the compound had low crystallinity, as seen in FIG. 1.
Investigation of Salt forms of iV-(3-(5-((l-Ethylpiperidin-4-yl)(methyl)amino)-3-(pyrimidin-5-yl)- lH-pyrrolo [3,2-Z>] pyridin- l-yl)-2,4-difluorophenyl)propane- 1-sulfonamide
The compound N-(3-(5-((l-ethylpiperidin-4-yl)(methyl)andno)-3-(pyrimidin-5-yl)-lH-pyrrolo [3 ,2-Z>]pyri din- l-yl)-2,4-difluorophenyl)propane-l -sulfonamide was combined with various acids in various solvent systems.
A 96-well master plate was charged by dosing compound in MeOH (stock solution) with a concentration of approx. 40 mg/mL. This plate was placed in a vacuum oven for liquid removal to obtain the same amount of solid material in each well. Subsequently different solvents/solvent mixtures and the acids were added to the solid material in each well (approx. 500μί) and the whole plate was heated up to 50 °C for 2 hours while stirring (using a small stirring bar added to each well).
The acids used were as shown in Table 1. The solvents used were as shown in Table 2. Crystallinity of salts obtained either by the slurry experiment or crystallization by evaporation.
To investigate crystal formation by a slurry experiment, the plate was allowed to cool and the crystallinity of the resulting salts was investigated by XRPD. An image of the master plate showing the salts obtained is shown in FIG. 2A and images of XRPD performed on the salt from each of the master plate wells, showing the crystallinity of the salts formed, is shown in FIG. 2B.
To investigate crystal formation by an evaporation experiment, after the heating period, the solutions were filtered at the same temperature (50 °C) using a preheated filter plate to ensure that no non-dissolved material can be transferred into the other crystallization plates. The filtrate was dispensed into an evaporation plate (approx.. 200μί). The solvents were allowed to evaporate, and the crystallinity of the resulting salts was investigated by XRPD. An image of the master plate showing the salts obtained is shown in FIG. 3A and images of XRPD performed on the salt from each of the evaporation plate wells, showing the crystallinity of the salts formed, is shown in FIG. 3B.
Table 1. Salts Used for Salt Form Investigation
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Table 2. Solvents Used for Salt Form Investigation
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
REFERENCES
1: Waizenegger IC, Baum A, Steurer S, Stadtmüller H, Bader G, Schaaf O, Garin-Chesa P, Schlattl A, Schweifer N, Haslinger C, Colbatzky F, Mousa S, Kalkuhl A, Kraut N, Adolf GR. A Novel RAF Kinase Inhibitor with DFG-Out-Binding Mode: High Efficacy in BRAF-Mutant Tumor Xenograft Models in the Absence of Normal Tissue Hyperproliferation. Mol Cancer Ther. 2016 Mar;15(3):354-65. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0617. Epub 2016 Feb 25. PubMed PMID: 26916115.
Available For Licensing Yes – Ischaemic heart disorders; Lymphoedema; Parkinson’s disease
Registered Peripheral arterial disorders
Phase I/II Lymphoedema
No development reported Arteriosclerosis obliterans; Ischaemic heart disorders; Parkinson’s disease; Thromboangiitis obliterans
26 Mar 2019 Registered for Peripheral arterial disorders in Japan (IM)
21 Feb 2019 The Pharmaceutical Affairs and Food Sanitation Council recommends conditional and time-limited approval of beperminogene perplasmid for the improvement of ulcers associated with chronic peripheral arterial disease
21 Feb 2019 AnGes plans a clinical study to assess the efficacy of beperminogene perplasmid in improvement of pain at rest in chronic peripheral arterial disorders
In 2010, the product received fast track designation in the U.S. for the treatment of critical limb ischemia
HGF Plasmid (Beperminogene Perplasmid)Critical Limb Ischemia (Arteriosclerosis Obliterans & Buerger’s Disease) AMG0001 Injection, JAPAN AND US ALLIANCE Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma
PATENT
WO 2017126488
US 20170283446
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy (2014), 12(10), 1145-1156.
////////////Beperminogene perplasmid, japan 2019, ベペルミノゲンペルプラスミド , AnGes MG, Osaka University Hospital, Critical Limb Ischemia, Arteriosclerosis Obliterans, Buerger’s Disease, AMG0001, AMG-0001, DS-992 , HGF plasmid , fast track designation
FDA approves first treatment Ruzurgi (amifampridine) for children with Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, a rare autoimmune disorder
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today approved Ruzurgi (amifampridine) tablets for the treatment of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) in patients 6 to less than 17 years of age. This is the first FDA approval of a treatment specifically for pediatric patients with LEMS. The only other treatment approved for LEMS is only approved for use in adults.
“We continue to be committed to facilitating the development and approval of treatments for rare diseases, particularly those in children,” said Billy Dunn, M.D., director of the Division of Neurology Products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. “This approval will provide a much-needed treatment option for pediatric patients with LEMS who have significant weakness and fatigue that can often cause great difficulties with daily activities.”
LEMS is a rare autoimmune disorder that affects the connection between nerves and muscles and causes weakness and other symptoms in affected patients. In people with LEMS, the body’s own immune system attacks the neuromuscular junction (the connection between nerves and muscles) and disrupts the ability of nerve cells to send signals to muscle cells. LEMS may be associated with …
May 06, 2019
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today approved Ruzurgi (amifampridine) tablets for the treatment of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) in patients 6 to less than 17 years of age. This is the first FDA approval of a treatment specifically for pediatric patients with LEMS. The only other treatment approved for LEMS is only approved for use in adults.
“We continue to be committed to facilitating the development and approval of treatments for rare diseases, particularly those in children,” said Billy Dunn, M.D., director of the Division of Neurology Products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. “This approval will provide a much-needed treatment option for pediatric patients with LEMS who have significant weakness and fatigue that can often cause great difficulties with daily activities.”
LEMS is a rare autoimmune disorder that affects the connection between nerves and muscles and causes weakness and other symptoms in affected patients. In people with LEMS, the body’s own immune system attacks the neuromuscular junction (the connection between nerves and muscles) and disrupts the ability of nerve cells to send signals to muscle cells. LEMS may be associated with other autoimmune diseases, but more commonly occurs in patients with cancer such as small cell lung cancer, where its onset precedes or coincides with the diagnosis of cancer. LEMS can occur at any age. The prevalence of LEMS specifically in pediatric patients is not known, but the overall prevalence of LEMS is estimated to be three per million individuals worldwide.
Use of Ruzurgi in patients 6 to less than 17 years of age is supported by evidence from adequate and well-controlled studies of the drug in adults with LEMS, pharmacokinetic data in adult patients, pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation to identify the dosing regimen in pediatric patients and safety data from pediatric patients 6 to less than 17 years of age.
The effectiveness of Ruzurgi for the treatment of LEMS was established by a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal study of 32 adult patients in which patients were taking Ruzurgi for at least three months prior to entering the study. The study compared patients continuing on Ruzurgi to patients switched to placebo. Effectiveness was measured by the degree of change in a test that assessed the time it took the patient to rise from a chair, walk three meters, and return to the chair for three consecutive laps without pause. The patients that continued on Ruzurgi experienced less impairment than those on placebo. Effectiveness was also measured with a self-assessment scale for LEMS-related weakness that evaluated the feeling of weakening or strengthening. The scores indicated greater perceived weakening in the patients switched to placebo.
The most common side effects experienced by pediatric and adult patients taking Ruzurgi were burning or prickling sensation (paresthesia), abdominal pain, indigestion, dizziness and nausea. Side effects reported in pediatric patients were similar to those seen in adult patients. Seizures have been observed in patients without a history of seizures. Patients should inform their health care professional immediately if they have signs of hypersensitivity reactions such as rash, hives, itching, fever, swelling or trouble breathing.
The FDA granted this application Priority Review and Fast Track designations. Ruzurgi also received Orphan Drug designation, which provides incentives to assist and encourage the development of drugs for rare diseases.
The FDA granted the approval of Ruzurgi to Jacobus Pharmaceutical Company, Inc.